Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Pacton Acquires Calidus Conglomerate Gold Rights

VANCOUVER , Oct. 23, 2018 /CNW/ – Pacton Gold Inc. (TSXV: PAC, OTC: PACXF, FSE: 2NKN) (the “Company” or “Pacton“) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a definitive agreement (the “Agreement“) to acquire the conglomerate gold rights (“Gold Rights“) of Calidus Resources Limited (ASX:CAI) in both the Marble Bar sub-basin, and the Northeast Pilbara sub-basin of Western Australia’s Pilbara craton. (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Pacton Pilbara Gold Exploration Projects (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 1. Pacton Pilbara Gold Exploration Projects (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

Subject to TSX Venture Exchange acceptance, the conglomerate gold rights will be transferred to Pacton within 50 days.

The acquisition of the Calidus conglomerate gold rights is strategically significant for Pacton, and is consistent with Pacton’s directed strategy of acquiring Fortescue Group exploration conglomerate gold assets in parallel with its equally growing portfolio of Mesoarchean and Paleoarchean orogenic “mother lode” exploration projects.

Calidus is exploring for orogenic shear hosted gold deposits at its Warrawoona Gold Project south of Marble Bar in the Paleoarchean “basement rocks” of the Pilbara craton, which is excluded from the Agreement with Pacton (Figure 2).

Pacton’s Agreement with Calidus allows it to explore and exploit any conglomerate or transported gold deposits in the sedimentary rocks overlying the basement rocks in the Calidus holdings, which are scattered from the town of Marble Bar to the Nulllalgine-Beaton Creek area. The Fortescue Group formation that overlies the basement rocks on the tenements covered by the Calidus Agreement are composed entirely of outcropping Mount Roe Basalt.

Figure 2. Location of Calidus tenements subject to Calidus-Pacton Agreement. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 2. Location of Calidus tenements subject to Calidus-Pacton Agreement. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

Pacton is currently conducting field exploration in the Mallina Basin, on its Egina area properties, located approximately 200 km west of the Marble Bar sub-basin. Field exploration will commence on the Calidus project immediately following the transference of the conglomerate rights to Pacton.

Three areas of the Calidus conglomerate gold right tenements have already been targeted for exploration. Two areas are located near the town of Marble Bar. The third area, an immediate priority, consists of a portion of a north-pointing, 10 km long “spear” of Mount Roe basalt, which is the northern extension of the Mount Roe formation that underlies the Novo Resources Corp (NVO:TSXV) conglomerates at Nulllagine and Beaton Creek , located approximately 20 km to the south. The Pacton portion of the “Spear”, with a combined edge strike-length of about 15 km,  covers an area of 20 km2, approximately the same area as the Mount Roe surface exposure on Novo’s Beaton Creek tenements. This is due to the fact that the Mount Roe Basalt surface footprint at Novo’s Beaton Creek project is covered by the overlying Hardey formation conglomeratic members.

The preliminary targeting of the Calidus conglomerates is unusually precise due to the favourable weathering characteristics of the Pilbara and the differential silicification of known conglomerate units. In other words, Pacton has recorded the signatures of known Pilbara conglomerate deposits and has prioritized similar signatures on its Calidus conglomerate targets, including the “Spear”.

A preliminary estimate of mapped Mount Roe Basalt in all Calidus tenements includes approximately 50 linear km of Mount Roe edge exposure and downhill talus slope, covering a total area of approximately 90 square km. (Figures 3, 4, 5 & 6 showing selected Mount Row features).

Conglomerate target planning will continue and field operations will commence immediately following the transference of the conglomerate gold rights from Calidus to Pacton.

Figure 3. Section of distinct contact between Mount Roe Basalt and basement rocks. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 3. Section of distinct contact between Mount Roe Basalt and basement rocks. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)
Figure 4. Magnification of inset shown in Figure 3 above. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 4. Magnification of inset shown in Figure 3 above. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)
Figure 5. 300 m wide erosional edge and talus slope falling away from the Mount Roe high area in upper left of air photo. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 5. 300 m wide erosional edge and talus slope falling away from the Mount Roe high area in upper left of air photo. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)
Figure 6. “Tip of the Spear”. Mount Roe Basalt showing resistant, steep edges (left). Further down the 10 km spearhead, the Mount Roe silicified edges are still prominent. Note the drainage dissection winding across the spear (right). This will assist stratigraphic sampling at surface. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 6. “Tip of the Spear”. Mount Roe Basalt showing resistant, steep edges (left). Further down the 10 km spearhead, the Mount Roe silicified edges are still prominent. Note the drainage dissection winding across the spear (right). This will assist stratigraphic sampling at surface. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

Agreement Terms

Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company through its wholly-owned Australian subsidiary, will acquire the Gold Rights by issuing Calidus or its nominees 7,000,000 common shares. The Agreement includes a right to deferred compensation whereby Calidus may receive up to 3,000,000 additional common shares of Pacton on the first anniversary of completion of the transaction based on the 30-day VWAP of Pacton’s shares on the date of such issuance.

The Company will be seeking TSX Venture Exchange acceptance of the transaction forthwith.

About Pacton Gold

Pacton Gold (PAC: TSXV; PACXF: US) is a well-financed Canadian junior with key strategic partners focused on the exploration and development of conglomerate-hosted gold properties located in the district-scale Pilbara gold rush in Western Australia.

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved Peter Caldbick , P.Geo., a director of the Company and a Qualified Person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101. The qualified person has not yet verified the data disclosed, including sampling, analytical, and test data underlying the information or opinions contained in the written disclosure.

On Behalf of the Board of Pacton Gold Inc.

Alec Pismiris
Interim President & CEO

This news release contains or refers to forward-looking information based on current expectations, including, but not limited to the Company completion of the proposed transaction described herein, the prospect of the Company achieving success in exploring its properties and the impact on the Company of these events, including the effect on its share price. Forward-looking information is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, as actual results may differ materially from forecasted results. Forward-looking information is provided as of the date hereof and we assume no responsibility to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange nor their Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Pacton Gold Inc. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Pacton Gold Inc. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)
Cision
Cision

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pacton-acquires-calidus-conglomerate-gold-rights-300736242.html

SOURCE Pacton Gold Inc.

View photos

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2018/23/c3238.html

Categories
Precious Metals

BOB MORIARTY | Irving Delivers, Market Yawns

Original Source: http://www.321gold.com/editorials/moriarty/moriarty102318.html
Investors are funny. You can go to the chat boards and read about Novo Resources that had an incredible run in 2017 and read about how unhappy investors are that the price of shares has gone down. It’s my entire fault or it’s Quinton’s fault or it’s Eric Sprott’s fault. It’s everyone’s fault except the investors who wanted to wait until Novo went up to buy.
Well, screw them and the horse they rode in on. I was writing about Novo when it was $.45 a share, not telling people to buy at $8. Maybe if investors actually want to make money they should buy my book and learn to buy cheap and sell dear. It works for me and I am certain it will work for them.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Irving reported samples showing $23,400 rock in 2016 and investors ignored them. I’ve written the company up half a dozen times yet I was able to buy shares for $1 not long ago. And just the other day they reported more absurdly high-grade assays.
If you add up the gold assays from the 13 samples, you come to an average of over 46 grams of gold per ton. Irving is going to have the highest grade gold mine in the world and those samples represent exactly what they are going to find when they drill.
They are going to drill someday. A drill is on the way over but finding drilling assistants in Japan is a problem. Drilling might be in late November or be put off until spring but someday they will drill. When they do, I am going to hock the family jewels and buy more Irving shares. I own a lot now but not like I’m going to when they actually announce drilling.
Don’t bother whining to me about how you bought Irving shares after results came out and the price went down eventually. I don’t care. Whine to Quinton, I’m sure he gives a shit. Or better yet, whine to Eric Sprott, he loves holding the hands of investors who want to buy at the top and dump at the lows.
Irving is an advertiser. They are not as cheap as they were when I bought at $1.00 in August but they are a whole lot cheaper than they are going to be a day after they release the first drill results. I own shares. Do your own due diligence.
Irving Resources
IRV-C $1.33 (Oct 22, 2018)
IRVRF OTCBB 40.6 million shares
Irving Resources website
###
Bob Moriarty
President: 321gold
Archives

321gold Ltd

C

Categories
Exclusive Interviews Precious Metals

BRIEN LUNDIN | the Fed, the Dollar and Precious Metals

Brien Lundin, publisher of Gold Newsletter, sat down with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable to discuss precious metals and their relationship with recent Fed actions and the dollar.
VIDEO

AUDIO

TRANSCRIPT
http://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/10/22/brien-lundin-the-fed-the-dollar-and-precious-metals.html
Maurice Jackson: Joining us for a conversation is Brien Lundin, the president of Jefferson Financial, helping to protect your world.
Please tell us about Jefferson Financial and what type of services you provide.
Brien Lundin: We are essentially a provider of investment information. We publish Gold Newsletter, which is the oldest precious metals advisory in the world, having been started by Jim Blanchard in 1971 as a way for him to advocate for the return of gold ownership, legalized gold ownership to American citizens. And I also produce the New Orleans Investment Conference, an annual event that Jim Blanchard also started in 1974 after he was successful in helping to get gold legalized. He had an investment conference to teach American investors how to buy gold, how to invest in the gold markets, and silver, and it’s been going on ever since. We have the oldest, and I believe the most respected investment event out there.
Maurice Jackson: We brought you on today to get your insights on a number of topics, and I would like to begin our discussion with the Federal Reserve and its commitment to increase interest rates and reduce its debt obligations on its balance sheet. I have to begin by asking you, is that even possible for the Fed to unwind its balance sheet?
Brien Lundin: Well, it can unwind its balance sheet, I think the key question is at what pace it can simply let the obligations run off as they mature, which would take quite literally decades for that to happen. But the key is, can the Fed do it without unforeseen, or dangerous consequences to the U.S. economy and stock market. And frankly I don’t think it can, as it increase its balance sheet as it was the buyer of last resort to keep interest rates low. And as the Fed had, as you know, an unprecedented program called Quantitative Easing, which was just money printing, all of this to support the market. We saw the effects in not retail price inflation as many of us feared, but in financial assets inflation, which to be fair, was their goal all along.
On the way up, as the balance sheet was rising and as quantitative easing was hitting its stride, the correlation between the Fed’s balance sheet and the S&P 500 was around 97%, so the Fed inflated the stock market, bull market. It was directly behind it.
And the question now is, if they had that much of a correlation on the way up, well, now that they’re on the way down, are we going to have a similar correlation? And I think the events of the week when the DOW lost over 1,400 points over a couple of days is powerful evidence that the Fed won’t be able to get away with it without some dire consequences in the equity markets.
Maurice Jackson: Speaking of those dire consequences, from a macro perspective, what type of impact are the Fed’s decisions having on global markets? And should we be concerned about contagion and capital flight from peripheral markets?
Brien Lundin: Well, it’s actually attracting some money to the U.S. because you have, on a relative basis, higher rates in U.S. treasuries than you have in similar instruments in Europe and elsewhere. So it is attracting money and helping to support the dollar, but I don’t think it’s making the dollar strong. If anything, it’s preventing the dollar’s decline because the Fed wants rates to rise now, it really can’t do it much longer for a number of reasons.
First , the Fed is going to crater the economy if it gets rates to high. Second, we can’t, because of the large debt loads we have right now; the U.S. simply cannot bear the burden of higher interest rates while we have this kind of a debt burden. If interest rates got to historic levels, and by historic levels, I’m talking of 10, 15 years ago where the interest rate burden on the Federal debt was on the order of 5–6%. If we got to those levels again, then the interest burden on the federal debt would be on the order of $1.2 trillion. And that’s far greater than the whole deficit is right now.
So, I just don’t think that’s politically possible. So if we’re looking at interest rates of 5–6% on the Federal debt, we’re talking about a Fed funds rate that probably around 3%. I think that’s the upper limit.
Maurice Jackson: You referenced the U.S. currency’s decline. You know the U.S. for all intents and purposes is in a trade war. And President Trump recently shared he’s not in favor of the Fed’s recent rate hikes. Is the Fed jeopardizing his position in discussions with his adversaries in the trade war?
Brien Lundin: I don’t think his trade war really affects that so much. I think one of the reasons why Trump is out there bemoaning and belittling the Fed so vociferously is because he’s looking for an excuse in case the economy starts downward. Or in case there’s a serious stock market decline. He wants to be able to blame it on someone except himself, and the Fed will be the obvious target. So he’s kind of setting the table for that, I believe. Plus he’s obviously in favor, and his administration is in favor, of low interest rates and debt. I think that’s what we’re going to keep getting.
Maurice Jackson: Now when do you foresee the Fed’s rate hikes ending? And what may be the effects upon the conclusion, long term?
Brien Lundin: Well, if the upper limit is around 3%, that means we have about three more quarter-point rate hikes ahead of us. If the Fed does one in December, which everybody expects, then that means it will only need a couple more to get to 3%, and that could happen in the first half of next year.
I don’t think that’s a widely understood or appreciated fact right now. I think there’s some spark money that’s been seeing that for some time, in realizing that the Fed is in the back half of its rate hike campaign, while other currencies, other central banks, like the ECB and the Bank of England, have yet to begin their rate tightening. But they are on schedule to do so very soon. So I think there’s already been a shift in large money allocations from the dollar into the euro and the pound. And I think we’re going to continue seeing that, and I think that’s the reason why the dollar has not been able to, say, break out of the 95 range on the dollar index and why I believe the dollar will be headed lower over the next six months or so.
Maurice Jackson: Speaking of smart money, we like to remind our audience that we refer to money as physical gold and physical silver. Talk to us about the recent price movement in gold.
Brien Lundin: What’s really been interesting about gold is that it has risen on a number of occasions recently when the stock market was crashing and yet the dollar was strong. Now typically that would argue that the buying is safe haven related. And, Maurice, I never like that as a driver for gold. I’m never in favor of that as a reason for gold to go up for any sustained period because these, the safe-haven type buying, these geopolitical political issues, these little flash crises, they come and go, and they don’t provide a sustained driver for gold. What really drives gold over the longer term are concerns over monetary issues, concerns over debt and currency depreciation and the like, and inflation.
So when you see the dollar going up along with gold, that’s a sign that the buying is safe haven related and probably not lasting. However, at the same time, and even on those days when the stock market was crashing, the gold stocks were rising. They were very strong and that argues for a more of a long-term approach to the gold buying. That’s an indication that people are buying gold because they see longer-term monetary based factors at play. So it’s a little bit of both right now, and I find it very interesting. It’s going to shake out one way or the other, but what’s encouraging is that we’re seeing indications of both types of demand for gold. But both are contributing to higher gold prices. And in fact, if we can get enough of a gain in gold to spark a short covering rally, by all the short speculators out there, then I’ll take that. That’s fine with me. That could be enough to really start a longer-term rally in metals.
Maurice Jackson: I have to ask this as well. What prudent action should someone take, based on today’s discussion regarding physical precious metals?
Brien Lundin: Well, they need to own physical precious metals. That’s what I tell everyone; if you’re a newbie to the sector, make sure you have your physical precious metals component, the foundation of your precious metals allocation. Make sure you have that in place, make sure you have it accessible. Don’t put it in bank safe deposit boxes. Make sure you have access to it. I’m a big fan of small denomination silver coins that are junk, you know, old junk silver. As an important component of what somebody should own, but they need to get the physical component in place. That’s the first thing, and even some experienced gold and silver bugs to the sector, they like to play around in the mining stocks, but a lot of them don’t have that physical component in place.
And you really need to, that’s your insurance, it’s something everyone needs. And has to have an insurance against not the unforeseen, but against the inevitable.
Maurice Jackson: You said a lot of information there. I’d like to just recover there for a second. Number one you referenced not to have it in a safe deposit box. Could you please expand on that for a little bit?
Brien Lundin: One of the things you’re insuring yourself against or hedging against by owning physical metals is a bank holiday. So if they lock the banks, how are you going to get to your precious metals? Now that limits your storage options, but there are still a number of options out there, including some in a personal safe, some in other security centers. And then if you’re going to have a fairly large allocation of physical, you can have some in storage facilities both domestic and international.
I tell people that I have very good friends in the precious metal storage business. Yet, I still recommend that if you’re going to have a substantial physical bullion investment, to spread your storage around, because you just never know. You never know what’s going to happen in each specific company or facility. And that’s a risk that you can easily diversify and really should.
Maurice Jackson: You know another fact that a lot of people aren’t aware of, is the safe deposit boxes at your banks, are they FDIC insured?
Brien Lundin: No, they’re not a deposit. So they’re not insured.
Maurice Jackson: That is very important for for our audience to understand.
Brien Lundin: And they’re not insured. The authorities have access to those with a subpoena. Interestingly, one of the things we discovered here in New Orleans during Katrina is that you should also not have a safe deposit box on the first floor of a bank. Because there are a number of safe deposit boxes in the New Orleans area that were under 12 feet of water for a weeks at a time after the hurricane. And they are not waterproof by the way, so a lot of these things you need to consider when looking to store precious metals and valuable documents.
Maurice Jackson: Another point you made was regarding mining stocks. I think a lot of individuals who are investors, particularly in the secondary market, are not aware that they can own physical metals, so they’re under the impression that they own mining company that owns gold and that is incorrect. You are only basically a company that is mining, but they don’t provide you the physical metal. When you purchase the stock, you’re going to get back cash, you’re not getting back the metal. Very important for us to understand here. If I may ask you this sir, we all have our favorites, of the big five, which are gold, silver, platinum, palladim, and rhodium, which ones have your attention and why?
Brien Lundin: Gold and silver primarily; the other three have large industrial components to them. So there are other factors, and they make good investments and good speculations in certain times, but gold and silver are the pure monetary metals. A lot of people talk about the industrial component to silver, but quite frankly, if silver was only valued on its industrial value, it would be $5 an ounce or less right now. So the rest of that margin or premium in its price is really monetary value. If you like gold, you have to love silver because silver is going to follow gold, but it’s going to move more than gold in the same direction. So it offers kind of an innate leverage to the gold price. If gold’s rising in terms of the fiat currency, silver’s going to also rise but to a greater degree.
Now there’s the downside of that as well; it’s going to go more quickly to the down side in a down market. But it is something that I tell people they really need a hold, a blend of the two. But for your hedging against financial catastrophe or a steady devaluation of the dollar, you really need to own gold and silver primarily.
Maurice Jackson: May I ask you this as well? The gold-silver ratio, how does that factor in your decision on purchasing?
Brien Lundin: Well, I think it determines the health of a market more so than timing, perhaps a little bit about value, or the relative value of the metals. But when the gold-silver ratio is falling, that means that silver is outperforming gold to the upside. And that is the hallmark of a good, strong, consistent, sustainable bull market in gold. And when the opposite is in effect, then it’s not positive, it doesn’t reflect on strength in the metals in general. I don’t don’t recommend that people trade the gold-silver ratio, because if you say sell gold and buy silver because the ratio is falling, then you’re mitigating your potential gains because they’re both going to rise, or they’re going to head in the same direction.
So if they’re both rising and you’re selling gold, you’re cutting a good portion of your potential gains out of the equation. So I don’t like trading your ratio, I like to look at it as a signal of the relative strength of the trend in one direction or the other.
Maurice Jackson: Interesting perspective, and thank you for sharing that. Switching gears, the New Orleans Investment Conference will be conducted November 1-4 in beautiful downtown New Orleans. Mr. Lundin, tell us about the world’s greatest investment event? Who are some of the featured speakers and discussion topics?
Brien Lundin: Well, I touched on it a bit earlier. The conference has been around since 1974 when Jim Blanchard started it, and Jim was a fairly flamboyant kind of a guy. He really went over the top with inviting big name speakers to the conference, so we’ve inherited that legacy and try to burnish as best we can. And so we get speakers here that you won’t see elsewhere, in general the line-up of speakers that we bring to our attendees is higher quality I believe than you’ll find anywhere else.
This year we have Robert Kiyosaki, we have political commentators Mark Steyn and Jonah Goldberg. We have James Grant who is one of the most eloquent advocates for gold in particular, most eloquent commentators on the financial markets out there. We have Doug Casey, of course, who’s always a big fan favorite. We have Peter Schiff, we have Dennis Gartman, Rick Rule. We have Guy Adami from CNBC who’s a really interesting guy. We have Ben Hunt who writes a blog, and doesn’t speak very often at conferences, but he has a blog that’s widely read by some really smart people in the markets.
And then we’ve got dozens upon dozens of other speakers, experts in just about every sector, but with a particular emphasis on metals and mining stocks.
Maurice Jackson: What type of attendees usually attend the New Orleans Investment Conference?
Brien Lundin: Well, they are smart, number one, because you have to be smart to pick this event to come to it, because it caters to really smart investors. It also caters to self-directed investors; these are people who are independent thinkers, maverick thinkers, they’re information hungry. They may have a large portion of their portfolio with money managers, but a large portion of their portfolio is directed by them, and according to the views that they have.
And the conclusions that they have after a lot of investigation of the markets and trends and listening to a lot of people. So it’s a smart group. It’s a successful group. One of the things I tell our attendees every year is that, yeah, we have great people, top of the line experts on the stage, but look around you. There are literally hundreds of very successful investors around you at this event. And I’ve never seen one of them who wasn’t willing to share his ideas and strategies, you know? And best thoughts on the markets and where they’re heading. So there’s a lot of fantastic market intelligence just within the crowd at our event.
Maurice Jackson: There’s a number of intellectual capital there at the conference. And speaking of the attendees, this will be my third year in attendance, and I have to admit I’m looking forward to meeting the attendees equally as I am to the guest speakers. The networking opportunities with some of the best minds all in one place is priceless. If you do not have your tickets, we welcome you to visit our website, provenandprobable.com and on the right hand column of the website you will see an image for the New Orleans Investment Conference. Click on the image, and you will be taken directly to the registration page.
Before we close, tell us about the gold newsletter and how we can retrieve your information on a regular basis.
Brien Lundin: Well, Gold Newsletter, as I mentioned, before is the oldest and I would say one of the most respected and successful newsletters or advisories on precious metals and mining stocks out there. Jim Blanchard started it in 1971, literally the day that Nixon closed the gold window. And it’s an important history in the hard money movement in advocating for the very legalization of gold in America. So we have a long, illustrious history. We’re trying to build on that every day, and we cover not only the economy, geopolitics and the kinds of things that affect all of the asset classes, but we do specifically focus on precious metals and what’s driving them and we cover a number of mining stocks. Typically junior mining stocks that have the potential to rise when precious metals prices rise or on discovery of new deposits. So that’s kind of our casino as, or where we have a number of high potential, higher risk for sure, but much higher potential investment opportunities.
Maurice Jackson: You know, Mr. Lundin, for someone that wants to get more information regarding Jefferson Financial, please share the contact details.
Brien Lundin: Well, for Gold Newsletter you can go to GoldNewsletter.com very simply, and for the New Orleans Investment Conference, NewOrleansConference.com, although I believe you’ll have some links as well, Maurice, that will get people some special opportunities to the conference.
Maurice Jackson: I certainly will sir. And as a reminder for our audience, we are licensed brokers to buy and sell gold, silver, platinum, palladium and rhodium, off shore storage accounts, and precious metals IRAs. To have conversation, please email Maurice@MilesFranklin.com, or call 919-274-5680.
And last but not least, please visit our website ProvenandProbable.com, where we interview the most respected names in the natural resource space. You may reach us at contact@provenandprobable.com.
Brien Lundin of Jefferson Financial, thank you for joining us today on Proven and Probable.
Brien Lundin: Great to be with you.
With a career spanning four decades in the investment markets, Brien Lundin serves as president and CEO of Jefferson Financial, a highly regarded publisher of market analyses and producer of investment-oriented events. Under the Jefferson Financial umbrella, Lundin publishes and edits Gold Newsletter, a cornerstone of precious metals advisories since 1971. He also hosts the New Orleans Investment Conference.
Maurice Jackson is the founder of Proven and Probable, a site that aims to enrich its subscribers through education in precious metals and junior mining companies that will enrich the world.

Want to read more about Gold and Silver? Sign up to receive the FREE Streetwise Reports’ newsletter.
 Newsletter Sign-Up

Disclosure: 
1) Maurice Jackson is a licensed representative of Miles Franklin Precious Metals Investments. Proven and Probable disclosures are listed below.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click herefor important disclosures about sponsor fees.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article.
Proven and Probable LLC receives financial compensation from its sponsors. The compensation is used is to fund both sponsor-specific activities and general report activities, website, and general and administrative costs. Sponsor-specific activities may include aggregating content and publishing that content on the Proven and Probable website, creating and maintaining company landing pages, interviewing key management, posting a banner/billboard, and/or issuing press releases. The fees also cover the costs for Proven and Probable to publish sector-specific information on our site, and also to create content by interviewing experts in the sector. Monthly sponsorship fees range from $1,000 to $4,000 per month. Proven and Probable LLC does accept stock for payment of sponsorship fees. Sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
The Information presented in Proven and Probable is provided for educational and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. You should not make any decision, financial, investments, trading or otherwise, based on any of the information presented on this forum without undertaking independent due diligence and consultation with a professional broker or competent financial advisor. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum at your own risk.

Categories
Energy Oil & Gas

Oil & GAS | Oil Companies Ditch Permian for Oklahoma Plays

Original Source: https://energyandresourcesdigest.com/oil-companies-ditch-permian-oklahoma-plays-nfx-eog-scoop-stack-merge-score/
If you follow the oil markets as I do, you might have heard that the Permian Basin in West Texas is the most prolific oil basin in the U.S. But the Permian has a big problem.
Producers are unable to get any more oil out.
Yes, there’s plenty more oil there. But the Permian has run out of takeaway pipeline capacity.
New pipeline projects won’t be ready until 2020. That means producers have had to severely discount their Permian crude destined for Gulf Coast refineries. For instance, on September 4, WTI Midland oil traded a discount of $23.95 per barrel to Magellan East Houston oil.
Those discounts come right off of a producer’s bottom-line profits. If you’re an investor, think of it as coming right off of your share price.
Oklahoma producers don’t have those problems. Sooner State exploration and production companies are laughing all the way to Cushing, Oklahoma.
Today there are several major oil plays in Oklahoma, referred to as the SCOOP, STACK, SCORE and Merge plays.
The STACK play acronym comes from the Sooner Trend oil field, Anadarko Basin, and Canadian and Kingfisher counties. Unlike the Granite Wash, Eagle Ford or Bakken, STACK isn’t a geological formation but a geographic area.
The SCOOP (South Central Oklahoma Oil Province) play is a geological formation. It’s also located in the Anadarko Basin.
The SCORE (Sycamore, Caney, Osage Resource Expansion) play is the sole idea of Newfield Exploration. Steve Campbell, a senior VP at Newfield, said Newfield was currently leasing 350,000 acres in the Anadarko Basin.
“It is the equivalent of 1 million net effective acres when all the multiple stacked horizons are considered,” he said. Newfield plans to invest $365 million to further delineate its SCORE acreage and different play levels.
Lastly, the Merge play is where STACK and SCOOP come together – hence “merge.”

Pipelines in the Right Places

Unlike West Texas’ pipeline-limited Permian, Oklahoma pipeline companies are staying ahead of producer capacity demand. They are doing this in the face of initial production rates that are similar to those in the Eagle Ford and Permian plays.
Since 2013, Oklahoma producers have invested in higher production well completions. They are also focused on the core acreage in the Oklahoma plays. That has resulted in a 70% increase in initial production rates.
Currently there are 139 rigs operating in Oklahoma. Most of them are in the SCOOP and STACK formations. And I think we’re going to see rapid growth in Oklahoma’s other plays as well.
Producers with acreage in the SCOOP, STACK, SCORE and Merge plays will begin to shift drill rigs there from the backlogged Permian.
Both Newfield Exploration Co. (NYSE: NFX) and EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE: EOG) are a great way to play the growing oil boom in Oklahoma.
Good investing,
Dave

Categories
Energy

URANIUM | U3O8 Corp. Announces Closing of Up-Sized Non-Brokered Private Placement, Securities for Debt Transaction and Amendments to Warrant Terms

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – October 22, 2018) –  U3O8 Corp. (TSX: UWE) (OTCQB: UWEFF) (“U3O8 Corp.” or the “Company“) is pleased to announce that further to its news release dated October 1, 2018, it has completed its previously announced non-brokered private placement. Due to increased investor demand, the Company increased the size of the private placement to $573,500 from $400,000. The Company issued 2,294,000 units (“Units“) at a price of $0.25 per Unit, for total gross proceeds of $573,500 (the “Offering“).

Each Unit consists of one (1) common share in the capital stock of U3O8 Corp. (“Common Share“) and one (1) common share purchase warrant (“Warrant“). Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share at a price of $0.40 per Common Share until the date which is thirty-six (36) months following the closing date of the Offering, whereupon the Warrants will expire.

Proceeds of the Offering will be used for metallurgical test work on the Company’s Laguna Salada uranium-vanadium deposit in Argentina, for general corporate and administrative purposes, and to enable the Company to consider exercising its right to maintain its 39% holding in the private frac sand company, South American Silica Corp. (“SAS“), should SAS undertake a private placement in light of positive developments in the frac sand industry.

In connection with the Offering, the Company paid to certain eligible finders compensation consisting of cash commissions of $7,000 and 28,000 compensation warrants (“Broker Warrants“). The Broker Warrants will be exercisable into Common Shares of the Company at $0.40 and will be valid for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of closing of the Offering.

All securities issued and issuable pursuant to the Offering are subject to a four month and one day statutory hold period.

Closing of the Offering is subject to the receipt of all regulatory approvals, including the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Securities for Debt Transaction

The Company has agreed to settle outstanding cash debts in the amount of $51,500 to certain service providers and former employees (the “Creditors“) through the issuance of an aggregate of 206,000 Units at a price of $0.25 per Unit.

Additionally, the Company has agreed to settle $88,268 with the Creditors through the issuance of 304,371 common shares at a price of $0.29 per common share (the “Debt Shares“) (together, the issuance of the Units and Debt Shares to Creditors, the “DebtSecurities“).

The issuance of the Debt Securities is subject to the receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals, including the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Company is choosing to settle the outstanding indebtedness through the issuance of the Debt Securities as the Company will require cash for working capital and continuing operations.

The Debt Securities and securities issuable thereunder are subject to a four month and one day statutory hold period.

Related Party Transactions

Dr. Richard Spencer (CEO of the Company) and Mr. John Ross (CFO of the Company) participated in the Offering (the “Insider Participation“) and their participation constitutes a related party transaction within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 (“MI 61-101“).

Dr. Spencer acquired 140,000 Units for proceeds of $35,000 and Mr. Ross acquired 140,000 Units for proceeds of $35,000.

In the absence of exemptions, the Company is required to obtain a formal valuation for, and minority shareholder approval of, the related party transaction. The related party transaction is exempt from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 as neither the fair market value of securities being issued to insiders nor the consideration being paid by insiders exceeds 25% of the Company’s market capitalization.

U.S. Registration

The securities offered pursuant to the Offering and the issuance of the Debt Shares have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act“), or applicable state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold to persons in the United States absent registration or an exemption from such registration requirements. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

Warrant Extension and Amendment

The Company and holders of 759,250 common share purchase warrants (“Original Warrants“) issued pursusant to a previous private placement have agreed to extend the expiry date and amend the exercise price of the Original Warrants.The Original Warrants will expire twelve months from the original expiry date and be exercisable into a common share of the Company at $0.50, as depicted in the table below:

Issue Date Issued Exercise
Price
Original
Expiry
Date
Amended
Expiry
Date
Amended Exercise
Price
Effective Date Original # of Warrants Issued
November 3,
2015
$0.70 November 3, 2018 November 3, 2019 $0.50 November 3, 2018 759,250

None of the Original Warrants are held by insiders of the Company.

The Toronto Stock Exchange has provided conditional approval for the extension of the expiry date and amended exercise price with an effective date for the amendments of November 3, 2018.

About U3O8 Corp.

U3O8 Corp. is focused on exploration and development of deposits of uranium and battery commodities in South America. Battery commodities that occur with uranium resources include vanadium, nickel, zinc and phosphate. The Company’s mineral resources estimates were made in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, and are contained in the following deposits:

  • Laguna Salada Deposit, Argentina — a PEA shows that this near surface, free-digging uranium-vanadium deposit has low production-cost potential; and
  • Berlin Deposit, Colombia — a PEA shows that Berlin also has low-cost uranium production potential due to revenue that would be generated from by-products of phosphate, vanadium, nickel, rare earths (yttrium and neodymium) and other metals that occur within the deposit.

Additional Information

Information on U3O8 Corp., its resources and technical reports are available at www.u3o8corp.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Follow U3O8 Corp. on Facebook: www.facebook.com/u3o8corp, Twitter: www.twitter.com/u3o8corp and YouTube: www.youtube.com/u3o8corp.

For further information, please contact:

Carolina Diaz at carolina@u3o8corp.com or phone (416) 868-1491 or Richard Spencer, President & CEO, U3O8 Corp., Tel: (647) 292-0225 richard@u3o8corp.com

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release includes certain “forward looking statements” related with the development plans, economic potential and growth targets of U3O8 Corp’s projects. Forward-looking statements consist of statements that are not purely historical, including statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intensions for the future, and include, but not limited to, statements with respect to: (a) the low-cost and near-term development of Laguna Salada, (b) the Laguna Salada and Berlin PEAs, (c) the potential of the Kurupung district in Guyana and (d) the price and market for uranium. These statements are based on assumptions, including that: (i) actual results of our exploration, resource goals, metallurgical testing, economic studies and development activities will continue to be positive and proceed as planned, and assumptions in the Laguna Salada and Berlin PEAs prove to be accurate, (ii) requisite regulatory and governmental approvals will be received on a timely basis on terms acceptable to U3O8 Corp., (iii) economic, political and industry market conditions will be favourable, and (iv) financial markets and the market for uranium will improve for junior resource companies in the short-term. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in such statements, including, but not limited to: (1) changes in general economic and financial market conditions, (2) changes in demand and prices for minerals, (3) the Company’s ability to establish appropriate joint venture partnerships, (4) litigation, regulatory, and legislative developments, dependence on regulatory approvals, and changes in environmental compliance requirements, community support and the political and economic climate, (5) the inherent uncertainties and speculative nature associated with exploration results, resource estimates, potential resource growth, future metallurgical test results, changes in project parameters as plans evolve, (6) competitive developments, (7) availability of future financing, (8) exploration risks, and other factors beyond the control of U3O8 Corp. including those factors set out in the “Risk Factors” in our Annual Information Form available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. U3O8 Corp. assumes no obligation to update such information, except as may be required by law. For more information on the above-noted PEAs, refer to the September 18, 2014 technical report titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Laguna Salada Uranium-Vanadium Deposit, Chubut Province, Argentina” and the January 18, 2013 technical report titled “U3O8 Corp. Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Berlin Deposit, Colombia.”

Categories
Precious Metals

SPROTT’S THOUGHTS | Brinkmanship

Brinkmanship

Oct 19, 2018 06:02 pm
By Trey Reik, Senior Portfolio Manager, Sprott Asset Management USA, Inc.
Over our two decades following global monetary affairs, we have often marveled at default confidence awarded the Federal Reserve. Don’t misinterpret us — the Fed’s power borders on surreal. Seven governors and twelve regional bank presidents set the price of money not only for the world’s largest economy, but through auspices of the dollar standard system, for the entire globe. No matter how practical “don’t fight the Fed” logic has proven over time, it does not diminish the folly that 19 capable and well-supported individuals might possibly price the world’s reserve currency more efficiently than free markets.
Record valuations for U.S. financial assets have inured investors to the daunting risks of unwinding eight years of QE and ZIRP. Because such radical monetary policy has never before been deployed, our 19 monetary mandarins, by definition, command no special insight into broad implications of Fed policy normalization. Into this unprecedented monetary vortex steps new Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, a seemingly low-key and forthright communicator bent on rational steps to normalize Fed policy. In this report, we share our perspective that the Fed’s dual policy agenda of simultaneous rate hikes and balance sheet reduction, rather than constituting some sort of scientifically-formulated policy elixir, amounts to little more than glorified brinkmanship — the Fed’s signature policy tool. Events of the past few weeks only serve to support our contention that Fed tightening is pinching global liquidity to a degree which threatens reigning valuations of traditional financial assets.

EMERGING MARKETS

In our June report, we highlighted a May 8, 2018 speech delivered by Fed Chairman Powell at an IMF-sponsored conference at the Swiss National Bank in Zurich. At the time, we observed that Chairman Powell made specious claims in suggesting “the role of U.S. monetary policy is often exaggerated,” especially with respect to its impact on emerging market [EM] economies. Among his most curious assertions, Chair Powell alleged,

“Monetary stimulus by the Fed and other advanced-economy central banks played a relatively limited role in the surge of capital flows to EME’s in recent years. There is good reason to think that the normalization of monetary policies in advanced economies should continue to prove manageable for EME’s. Fed policy normalization has proceeded without disruption to financial markets…”

It was in reading these patently disingenuous assessments that we first recognized our seemingly mild-mannered Fed Chair is actually on a determined crusade to roll back (what he perceives as) over-zealous accommodation of his predecessors, hell or high water. Chair Powell even noted in his Zurich speech that Fed policy normalization is likely to break a few things along the way.

“All that said, I do not dismiss the prospective risks emanating from global policy normalization. Some investors and institutions may not be well-positioned for a rise in interest rates, even one that the markets broadly anticipate.”

As recently as October 8, 2018, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard weighed in to ratify the Powell doctrine that EM disruptions in the wake of Fed tightening will be exceptions to the rule of better preparedness.

“We do want to take into account international developments. However, I think that what has happened, let’s say in 2018, has been limited to countries that have special circumstances attached to them.”

Well, through October 12, 2018, EM currency declines (versus USD) now measure 49.24% for the Argentine Peso, 35.33% for the Turkish Lira, 14.71% for the South African Rand, 13.19% for the Indian Rupee, 12.86% for the Russian Ruble and 12.50% for the Brazilian Real. While the Fed may attribute these FX performances to “special circumstances,” we would counter that these six countries total roughly 10% of global GDP and 25% of the world’s population. For a quarter of the world’s population, we suspect the “special circumstances” most top-of-mind are significant hits to collective purchasing power and quality of life now being inflicted by the Fed’s latest policy reversal.

NEUTRAL RATE

In mid-September, Fed stewards began to float the possibility that the FOMC’s short-term neutral rate might exceed its long-term neutral rate (3% in current dot plot). In a September 12, 2018 speech, entitled “What Do We Mean by Neutral?” Fed Governor Lael Brainard opined,

“It appears reasonable to expect the shorter-run neutral rate to rise somewhat higher than the longer-run neutral rate. These developments raise the prospect that, at some point, the Committee’s setting of the federal funds rate will exceed current estimates of the longer-run federal funds rate.”

Governor Brainard cited fiscal stimulus (tax cuts) and heightened risk appetite (rich financial asset valuations) as economic conditions potentially supportive of a higher short-term neutral rate. Following Governor Brainard’s lead, Chair Powell espoused the temporarily-higher thesis in his September 26, 2018 FOMC press conference remarks, “Maybe we’ll be raising our estimate of the neutral rate and we’ll just go to that, or maybe we’ll keep our neutral rate here [making a precise gesture with both of his hands] and then go one-or-two rate increases beyond that.”
Why would Fed Governors suddenly propose temporarily hiking rates above long-term targets so painstakingly established in prior dot plots? We contemplate two opposing explanations. Perhaps the Fed fears fiscal stimulus and tight labor conditions are combining to spur steeper-than-desired inflation. Alternately, the Fed may be recognizing that its dual policy agenda is pinching global dollar liquidity to an unacceptable degree, and, in preparation for imminent policy downshift, is jawboning markets to accomplish desired long-end tightening the Fed has so far failed to engender. While only time will tell, we view probabilities of these opposing interpretations far differently than current consensus!

NEW SHERIFF

Displaying escalating self-confidence typical of Fed Chairs, Mr. Powell raised a few eyebrows in a speech to the National Association for Business Economics in Boston. In his prepared remarks, Chair Powell credited “better conduct of monetary policy over the past few decades” for having greatly reduced the impacts of tight labor markets on inflation. [Huh?] In the same speech, Mr. Powell asserted that the Fed’s balance sheet runoff is “working very well.” The following day, in an interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff, Chair Powell stumbled into a classic central-banker trap in proclaiming, “There’s no reason to think this cycle can’t continue for some time, effectively indefinitely.”
Then, in response to a question about the FOMC’s removal of the phrase “accommodative” from its September assessment of monetary conditions, Chair Powell may have finally jumped the shark in proclaiming,

“Interest rates are still accommodative, but we’re gradually moving to a place where they will be neutral. We may go past neutral, but we’re a long way from neutral at this point, probably.”

Whoa! With this much global debt outstanding, “a long way from neutral,” equates to, “a bridge too far,” for financial asset prices. Immediately following Chair Powell’s October 3, 2018 comments, 10-year Treasury yields popped to seven-year highs (3.234% on October 5, 2018) and the S&P 500 Index slumped 6.7% in six trading sessions (to a October 11, 2018 close of 2,728.37).

WHAT JUST HAPPENED?

On Wednesday, October 10 and Thursday, October 11, the Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 1,377 points. What the heck? Did anyone see this coming? Well, just as February’s equity-market dislocation was dismissed as ill-fated gamma at a handful of inverse VIX ETF’s, October’s air pocket is now being pinned on “computer-driven option gamma hedging.” The good news is that by Friday (October 12, 2018), JP Morgan Chase global derivatives analyst Marko Kolanovic saw clear to proclaim “the majority (70%) of the systematic selling is behind us.” Unfortunately, Barclays Capital’s Maneesh Deshpande quickly countered that “volatility-control and risk-parity funds may need to sell billion of equities over the next couple of days,” on top of a likely billion in sales by exchange-traded-fund investors. At the risk of self-impeachment, we wonder, “Exactly which tea leaves are these guys reading?”
Conceding our limited grasp of Greek variables in contemporary markets, we proffer two pedestrian explanations for this past week’s equity-market swoon. First, following a well-established pattern, October weakness occurred directly in the middle of the Q3 blackout for share buybacks (generally two weeks prior to quarter-end through two days after earnings release). It is getting tough to ignore the fact that equity markets are increasingly vulnerable to dislocation when the undiscerning spigot of share-buybacks is turned off.
Second, Fed policy may simply be too tight to maintain current financial-asset valuations. As we have suggested, with this much debt in the global financial system, reigning asset prices cannot withstand rising interest rates (of either the long or short variety). Perhaps President Trump summed things best (October 10, 2018):

“The Fed is making a mistake. I think the Fed has gone crazy. The Fed is going loco and there’s no reason for them to do it.”

In our estimation, a cogent analytical framework for evaluating the impact of Fed tightening on global dollar liquidity is maintained by Sprott colleague, Andy Lees (Macro Strategy). On a daily basis, Andy calculates the U.S. dollar value of global money supply. In the context of the dollar-standard system, especially with .5 trillion in offshore dollar-denominated debt, it is the dollar value of global money supply which truly matters in evaluating global liquidity conditions. As Andy logically explains,

“In a 2-country world, say Europe and the States, if Europe doubled its money supply, then all other things being equal, as the euro would halve, there would be no change in the dollar value of world money supply. On the other hand, if Europe doubled its real GDP, again all other things being equal, then as its dollar purchasing power would rise, the dollar value of world money supply would rise by 50%.”

In the wake of this past week’s market volatility, the dollar value of world money supply has now declined .691 trillion or 4.29% from its April 2, 2018 high. Perhaps more relevant, a 60/40 portfolio of the MSCI World Net Index and JP Morgan Global Aggregate Total Return Bond Index has now declined an annualized 1.89% over the past six months and an annualized 5.36% over the past three months. The 60/40 allocation peaked slightly later than the dollar value of global money supply, but is clearly following the same path. In Andy’s words,

“The fall [in the 60/40 global portfolio] highlights what is happening at the real economy level, inferring that U.S. rates are too strong for the world, and that the world’s ability to service its dollar debt or buy oil and other dollar goods is falling. It would appear therefore that President Trump is correct to say that the Fed has over tightened, at least in the context of global growth…”

We may be talking our own book, but it is interesting to note that analysts of Andy’s pedigree are beginning to focus on the April 2018 period as a potential tipping point for the impact of Fed tightening on global liquidity. We wholeheartedly agree!

U.S. AS BASKET CASE?

A topic of current financial market debate is a fundamental assessment of the recent back-up in 10-year Treasury yields (from an August 24, 2018 low of 2.81% to a October 5, 2018 high of 3.23%). At the risk of oversimplifying, we would suggest Treasury prices are under pressure because there are not enough buyers to absorb exploding Treasury supply. At some point (perhaps already), Chair Powell’s bravado about levitating neutral rates will run smack into global disenchantment with the rapidly deteriorating U.S. fiscal position. It is one thing for our foreign creditors to pitch-in to bridge our gnawing federal budget deficit, but quite another to do so while the Fed is actively promoting a rising U.S. rate structure.
U.S. gross national debt rose by .27 trillion during the 2018 fiscal year to .52 trillion (105.4% of GDP). This increase was 33% higher than billion average-annual-growth between 2011 and 2017. Including fixed-rate, intra-governmental obligations, total 2018 interest on the U.S. federal debt measured billion, or roughly .5 billion every calendar day. As shown in Figure 1, the floating interest burden on the public portion is beginning to surge geometrically on the heels of relatively modest interest rate increases.

Figure 1: Average Interest Rate on U.S. Public Debt vs. Trailing Twelve Month Sum of Total Interest on U.S. Public Debt.  Source: Meridian Macro. Date: January 31, 1984-September 30, 2018.
Despite recent upticks in GDP, the U.S. Treasury reported on October 15, 2018, that the 2018 federal budget deficit surged 17% during fiscal 2018 to $779 billion. Even more troubling, current Treasury estimates peg the 2019 deficit at .85 trillion! In a mid-September report, Bank of America Merrill Lynch ranked 45 global economies by the quality of their domestic finances, measuring twin deficits (current account deficit plus federal budget deficit) as a percentage of forecast 2019 GDP. Among the 45 ranked countries, the U.S ranked fifth from worst, with domestic finances in better shape than only Argentina, Turkey, Brazil and Pakistan. Treasuries anyone?
With all due respect to the gallantry of our crusading Fed Chair, global capital flows are signaling Fed policy is already too tight, and by extension, the U.S. dollar’s tepid 3.4% YTD 2018 performance is actually too strong to facilitate overseas U.S. funding needs. Morgan Stanley currency strategist Hans Redeker nails these points in a September 23, 2018 Bloomberg interview:

“Widening dollar-supportive yield differentials should be seen in the context of rising capital import needs. We believe the current yield compensation offered by the U.S. is no longer adequate to attract sufficient foreign funds to cover U.S. capital import needs. The dollar has to decline to attract international funds to the U.S.”

BINGO!

In our addenda, we update a chart we have shared in the past, outlining the tight historical correlation between the U.S. dollar and the federal budget deficit. Tying into Mr. Redeker’s comments above, we reproduce in Figure 2, the even tighter correlation between the exploding federal budget deficit and the sinking percentage of U.S. dollar-denominated global FX reserves. Foreigners are generally proved prescient when first jumping ship.

Figure 2: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit versus U.S. Dollar Percentage of Global FX Reserve.  Source: Meridian Macro. Date: January 1, 2005 – October 15, 2018.

We offer a final visual we feel best captures the Sisyphean task Chair Powell faces in his quest to roll back eight years of FOMC largesse. Ironically, the petrol of Trump tax cuts is now fueling GDP growth which the Fed is interpreting (we believe mistakenly) as sufficient cover to normalize policy. Figure 3 dramatizes the resulting anomaly that the Fed is tightening directly into the teeth of an exploding federal deficit. It is literally only a matter of time before one of the two forces depicted in Figure 3 reverses course with a vengeance. We would suggest wagering on the sudden reversal of the surging federal deficit is the losing proposition.

Figure 3: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit versus Federal Funds Target Rate. Source: Meridian Macro. January 1, 1996 – October 15, 2018.

WHAT ABOUT GOLD?

During the next few months, we expect asset markets to come to terms with grossly misplaced investor faith in the sustainability of the Fed’s dual policy agenda of simultaneous rate hikes and balance sheet reduction. Should our suspicions prove correct, it is interesting to note that not only is consensus positioning diametrically opposed to our views, this positioning is also off the charts in terms of its unanimity. As shown in Figure 4, aggregate spec short positions in spot gold, VIX, and 2-, 5- and 10-YR Treasuries are completely unprecedented. What could possibly go wrong here?
 

Figure 4: Aggregate Net-Short Speculator Positioning on COMEX for Gold, VIX Index, 2-, 5- and 10-YR Treasuries. Source: Meridian Macro. Date: January 1, 2005 – October 12, 2018. 

A common institutional apprehension over gold’s portfolio merits is fear that gold and gold equities will prove vulnerable to any sharp downdraft in U.S. asset markets, so why bother with gold in the first place? This logic no doubt stems from “what happened last” reasoning tied to the 2008 market experience. In the fall of 2008, gold succumbed to broad financial asset deflation. We would suggest market conditions for gold in 2018 bear little resemblance to those in play back in 2008. Commodities were perhaps the hottest hedge fund theme on the planet during 2008, exceeded only by ubiquitous shorts in U.S. financials. Complicating matters, the hedge fund community was wildly leveraged on London-based (non Reg-T ) “total return swap” platforms, routinely extending 4-to-1 credit for standard portfolios. Most forget that on September 19, 2008, the SEC stunned the world in enacting a “temporary emergency action to prohibit short selling in [U.S.] financial companies to protect the integrity and quality of the securities market and strengthen investor confidence.” Translation being, hedge funds which were correctly and massively short U.S. financials were forced to cover these shorts and, by way of risk management, liquidate offsetting long positions across the commodity spectrum.
Given the brutal and sustained collapse of broad commodities since 2014, we would suggest commodity positioning in 2018 is virtually opposite that of 2008. Further, when proverbial “detritus” next hits the monetary “fan,” the U.S. dollar is unlikely to enjoy anywhere near the safe harbor bid it commanded in 2008, when the Fed’s balance sheet measured a svelte billion, or just 22% of its currently bloated profile.
Interestingly, during the 1377-point, 5.2% decline of the Dow Jones Industrial Average on October 10 and 11, spot gold rose 2.9%. Even more impressively, the venerable Philadelphia Stock Exchange Gold & Silver Index (XAU) soared 7.84% over the two-day span. Suffice it to say, these divergent performances herald far different market conditions for precious metals in 2018 than those existing in 2008.
 
 

Addenda


Figure 5: DXY Dollar Index vs. 12-Mos. Federal Budget Deficit.  Source: Meridian Macro. Date: January 1, 2009 – October 15, 2018.

 
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like Brinkmanship on Facebook

Recent Articles:

Sprott Gold Report: Physical Matters
Sprott Gold Report: Buying Opportunity as Gold and Silver Shorts Reach Record Levels
Sprott Gold Report: Summer Test
Sprott Gold Report: Gold Slumps on Trade War Fears
Sprott Gold Report: Gold Shows Up At The Berkshire Hathaway Shareholder Meeting

Sprott U.S. Media, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprott Inc., which is a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and operates through its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries: Sprott Asset Management LP, an adviser registered with the Ontario Securities Commission; Sprott Private Wealth LP, an investment dealer and member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd., a US full service broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC; Sprott Asset Management USA Inc., an SEC Registered Investment Advisor; and Resource Capital Investment Corp., also an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. We refer to the above entities collectively as “Sprott”.
The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.
Forward-Looking Statement
This report contains forward-looking statements which reflect the current expectations of management regarding future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, and similar expressions have been used to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current beliefs with respect to future events and are based on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements could vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors should be considered carefully and undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this document are based upon what management currently believes to be reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation and Sprott does not assume any obligation to update or revise.
Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any fund or account managed by Sprott. Any reference to a particular company is for illustrative purposes only and should not to be considered as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell nor should it be considered as an indication of how the portfolio of any fund or account managed by Sprott will be invested.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author’s as of the date of this commentary, and are subject to change without notice. This information is for information purposes only and is not intended to be an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination by Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the objectives of the investor, financial situation, investment horizon, and their particular needs. This information is not intended to provide financial, tax, legal, accounting or other professional advice since such advice always requires consideration of individual circumstances. The products discussed herein are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested.
Generally, natural resources investments are more volatile on a daily basis and have higher headline risk than other sectors as they tend to be more sensitive to economic data, political and regulatory events as well as underlying commodity prices. Natural resource investments are influenced by the price of underlying commodities like oil, gas, metals, coal, etc.; several of which trade on various exchanges and have price fluctuations based on short-term dynamics partly driven by demand/supply and also by investment flows. Natural resource investments tend to react more sensitively to global events and economic data than other sectors, whether it is a natural disaster like an earthquake, political upheaval in the Middle East or release of employment data in the U.S. Low priced securities can be very risky and may result in the loss of part or all of your investment.  Because of significant volatility,  large dealer spreads and very limited market liquidity, typically you will  not be able to sell a low priced security immediately back to the dealer at the same price it sold the stock to you. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investing in foreign markets may entail greater risks than those normally associated with domestic markets, such as political, currency, economic and market risks. You should carefully consider whether trading in low priced and international securities is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Sprott Global, entities that it controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may hold positions in the securities it recommends to clients, and may sell the same at any time.
Copyright © 2018 Sprott US Media, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you requested information about the Sprott Group.
Our mailing address is:

Sprott US Media

1910 Palomar Point Way Ste 200

CarlsbadCA 92008-5578

Categories
Exclusive Interviews

JAYANT BHANDARI | Gold: To go up as the Third World Implodes

Nevsun Resources (NSU), etc.

Sophisticated investors often follow gold price in US dollar. This is despite the fact that the biggest buyers of gold for wealth protection purposes are in the Middle East, South Asia, and South-East Asia. These buyers do not think in US dollar terms.
It is hard to believe, but the Middle East peaked economically in the 1970s–it has been going downhill ever since. I call them the Third World, for they failed to change culturally despite having access to financial resources. In fact, in the Middle East (and recently in Turkey, and increasingly in Malaysia and Indonesia) fanaticism grew exactly when they were becoming rapidly rich.
Having failed to develop positive cultural underpinnings, the Third World’s growth rate is falling and social instability is rising. China is the only exception.
The real problem of today is not in the USA or its currency (which are clearly showing signs of improvement, for now), but the Third World. As the problems of the Third World become more recognized, I expect gold demand to rise.
 

I give my views on the reality of the economies, with charts and statistics, of the Third World in the linked article.
On investments…
A combination of the lack of faith in the junior mining business and the approaching tax-loss selling has resulted in another fall in share prices. Here are companies that I am hoping to buy:

  • FPX Nickel (FPX; C$0.08)
  • Amarillo Gold (AGC; C$0.25)
  • VR Resources (VRR; C$0.17)
  • Salazar Resources (SRL; C$0.11)
  • Chalice Gold Mines (CXN; C$0.13)
  • Renaissance Gold (REN; C$0.16)
  • Kangaroo Resources (KRL.ASX; A$0.12)
  • Nkwe Platinum (NKP.ASX; A$0.076)
  • Keras Resources (KRS.LON; £0.0031)
  • Avrupa Minerals (AVU; C$0.05)
  • Altus Strategies (ALTS; C$0.045)
  • Energold Drilling (EGD; C$0.24)
  • GFG Resources (GFG; C$0.25)
  • Nevsun Resources (NSU; C$5.70)

Some people might wonder why I am suggesting NSU. There is still >5% upside left in it. If I make 5% in two months, it amounts to annualized 34% profit (Expected closure date of the merger: 31st December 2018).
If for any reason the closure date of NSU merger gets delayed by even a single day, I expect the share price to increase on such a news and then fall again early next year. This pathology exists because of the way taxation is structured. Understanding this pathology might help make some extra money.
Warm regards,

Jayant Bhandari

Associate: Rajni Bala

Disclaimer: All information found here, including any ideas, opinions, views, predictions, forecasts, commentaries, suggestions, or stock picks, expressed or implied herein, are for informational, entertainment or educational purposes only and should not be construed as personal investment advice. While the information provided is believed to be accurate, it may include errors or inaccuracies. The sole purpose of these musings is to show my thinking process when analyzing a stock, not to provide any recommendation. I will not and cannot be held liable for any actions you take as a result of anything you read here. Conduct your own due diligence, or consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions. Any investments, trades, speculations, or decisions made on the basis of any information found on this site, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.

Categories
Base Metals Precious Metals Project Generators

MILLROCK RESOURCES | POGO JORC RESOURCE IS 4.15MOZ AT 14.7GPT

Original Source: https://www.nsrltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Pogo-Resource-Update-Final-16-10-2018.pdf
Millrock Resources shareholders should note the following press release by Northern Star Resources regarding the Pogo Gold Mine.  Millrock Resources has assets in line with the mineral trend of the Pogo Gold Mine, which may be of significance with the new press release issued by Northern Star Resources.  The value proposition for Millrock Resources continues to reward committed shareholders.  We have been active buyers that current share prices of TSX-V: MRO | OTQCX – MLRKF.
For Information Contact:
Melanee Henderson
Investor Relations
Direct: 604-638-3164
Toll Free: 877-217-8978
Email: mhenderson@millrockresources.com

Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Pacton Expands the Gold Nugget Discovery Potential at its South Egina Project in the Pilbara

VANCOUVEROct. 19, 2018 /PRNewswire/ – Pacton Gold Inc. (TSXV: PAC, OTC: PACXF, FSE: 2NKN) (the “Company” or “Pacton“) is pleased to announce the first discovery of gold nuggets on the Golden Palms property (E 47/3810), (Figures 1 & 2). The nuggets were discovered by a prospecting crew working in advance of a geological exploration and mapping team.

This gold nugget discovery, within a 300 meter by 300 meter area, is significant in that it represents the first gold discovery on the Golden Palms tenement and has greatly expanded the known nugget-bearing potential of the South Egina area. This new discovery is located approximately 2.5 km northwest of the recently announced Friendly Creek gold nugget discovery (Pacton News: Oct 15, 2018), and occurs across the regional structural and stratigraphic fabric of the underlying bedrock geology.

Figure 1. Location map of Pacton tenements in the Egina Area. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 1. Location map of Pacton tenements in the Egina Area. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

The gold nuggets, which show various morphological shapes and textures, and which appear to be eluvial remnants liberated from the underlying bedrock by weathering, were collected in an area that is underlain by mafic to ultramafic volcanoclastic rocks. The basaltic rocks are described as similar to the basalts underlying the recent nugget discovery at the adjacent Friendly Creek tenement, except that the Friendly Creek basalts are massive, thick units, while the basalts underlying the recent Golden Palms tenement nugget discovery are mapped as being stratigraphically thinner, and are sparsely interbedded within a massive chert and limestone sedimentary package. Within the sedimentary package, the basalts do outcrop, but are usually covered by a layer of weathered colluvium, as occurs at the sites where the Golden Palms nuggets were discovered.

The prospective geological gold nugget area covered by Pacton’s South Egina project is large, poorly explored, and consists of an 8 km thick volcano-sedimentary system which extends for approximately 10 km along strike, in a NE-SW orientation, across the adjacent Golden Palms, Friendly Creek and Hong Kong tenements, (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Golden Palms and adjacent Pacton tenements. Mineralized Mesoarchean basal unit, Western Australia MINEDEX gold occurrences, and location of recent gold nugget discoveries (circle). (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Figure 2. Golden Palms and adjacent Pacton tenements. Mineralized Mesoarchean basal unit, Western Australia MINEDEX gold occurrences, and location of recent gold nugget discoveries (circle). (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

The nuggets and/or mineralization shown in Figure 2 are selected samples and are not necessarily representative of mineralization hosted on the Property.

About Pacton Gold

Pacton Gold (PAC: TSXV; PACXF: US, FSE: 2NKN) is a well-financed Canadian junior with key strategic partners focused on the exploration and development of conglomerate-hosted gold properties located in the district-scale Pilbara gold rush in Western Australia.

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Peter Caldbick, P.Geo., a director of the Company and a Qualified Person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101. The qualified person has not yet verified the data disclosed, including sampling, analytical, and test data underlying the information or opinions contained in the written disclosure.

On Behalf of the Board of Pacton Gold Inc.

Alec Pismiris
Interim President and CEO

This news release may contain or refer to forward-looking information based on current expectations, including, but not limited to the Company achieving success in exploring its properties and the impact on the Company of these events, including the effect on its share price. Forward-looking information is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, as actual results may differ materially from forecasted results. Forward-looking information is provided as of the date hereof and we assume no responsibility to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances. References to other issuers with nearby projects is for information purposes only and there are no assurances the Company will achieve similar results.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange nor their Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Pacton Gold Inc. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)

View photos

Pacton Gold Inc. (CNW Group/Pacton Gold Inc.)
Cision
Cision

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pacton-expands-the-gold-nugget-discovery-potential-at-its-south-egina-project-in-the-pilbara-300734553.html

Categories
Exclusive Interviews Precious Metals

ABEN RESOURCES | Canadian Explorer Reveals Year-Round Plan to Maintain Momentum

James Pettit, CEO of Aben Resources, in conversation with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable, discusses his company’s summer exploration in the Golden Triangle and how the company plans to keep the momentum going throughout the year.

VIDEO

AUDIO

TRANSCRIPT

Original Source:
http://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/10/19/canadian-explorer-reveals-year-round-plan-to-maintain-momentum.html

Canadian Explorer Reveals Year-Round Plan to Maintain Momentum 
Contributed Opinion

Source: Streetwise Reports  (10/19/18)

James Pettit, CEO of Aben Resources, in conversation with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable, discusses his company’s summer exploration in the Golden Triangle and how the company plans to keep the momentum going throughout the year.

Maurice Jackson: Joining us today is James Pettit, the president, CEO and director of Aben Resources Ltd. (ABN:TSX.V; ABNAF:OTCQB).
In our last interview, we discussed the next unanswered question for Aben Resources and that would be drill results. This week Aben Resources issued a press release conveying some intriguing results. Before we begin, for someone new to the story, who is Aben Resources and share with us the names and location of your three projects beginning with your flagship.

James Pettit: Aben Resources is a gold exploration company based out of Vancouver listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. Our flagship property is the Forrest Kerr property. It’s in the Golden Triangle, which is a region of northwestern British Columbia, which has got a tremendous history for high-grade discoveries, the likes of the Snip mine and the Eskay Creek mine discovered 30 some odd years ago. Eskay at the time was one of the highest grade mines in the world. Since then, there’s been a lot of discovery that’s happened over the years in terms of more gold, silver and copper. These are still in the development stage.

Many of them are waiting for possible higher prices for the commodity, but they’re probably the largest untapped development projects in the world, especially the copper projects. Now specifically with us, with the Forrest Kerr Project, we acquired that ground three years ago, and started assembling it. I put three claim groups together. We chose those because they’re on a major structural feature, which we look at as one of the controlling structural features in that whole Golden Triangle area. It’s called the Kerr Fault and it’s a big, big fault that you can see from space.

That is an area you want to be near for discovery potential and then there’s other geologic features that you want to be coincidental to that, and we’re right in between them. We’re in a good area. We’re getting a lot of attention. The market’s certainly paying attention to everything that goes on up there. The most recent new production up there is Pretium Resources’ Brucejack Mine, which is a very high-grade gold mine. That really brought about $2 billion in value to its investors. There’s lots of potential there. We’re excited about it.
That’s why we’ve been so concentrated on it. This year we’ve drilled now I think just short of 40 holes. We’ve got 24 to be released still. That’s going to take us through the rest of the year almost. We have another project that’ll get us through the winter because the weather in the Golden Triangle is pretty severe. It’s coastal mountain range right beside the panhandle of Alaska and gets a tremendous amount of rain or snow. It becomes almost impossible to work up there for the winter, unless you’ve got just a huge amount of money and resources to do it. That whole area will be going quiet soon.
We have another project called the Chico Project, which is in Saskatchewan, just south of what used to be called the Claude Resources gold mine. It’s been bought by Silver Standard for $337 million. Silver Standard is now called SSR. It acquired the ground between the Chico property and its property, which it bought from Claude Resources. Basically we think we’ve got an extension of what SSR is looking for because SSR’s interest now is to expand the known resource. To keep that mine alive for the next 20 years, it needs to find more of a resource.
https://www.abenresources.com/site/assets/files/4301/abn_chico_location_and_highlights.514x0-is.jpg
SSR has got a good resource to start with that itbought, but I think it has probably got five to seven years left. SSR wants to take this further. It’s drilling on the ground between them and us now. It has acquired all the ground. It’s giving us a good model to work with. We’ll go in there in the winter. It’s the best time to drill in Saskatchewan because it’s flat, it’s frozen. The lakes are frozen, so we can access an egress very easily. Essentially, we just put up the camp, bring in the rig, and move the rig with a helicopter if need be, or we skid it. We’ll be going in there in February. That’ll keep momentum going for the company.
Then we’ve also got a project up at the Yukon called the Justin, which is tied right on to Golden Predator’s ground, what it calls 3 Aces. We’re right on strike to the 3 Aces structure. We’ve done a little bit of work there this year in terms of trenching with the mechanical backhoe. We’ve got that up to the site by helicopter, and we’re waiting on assays. We’ve spent 10 days doing this. We think we’re sitting right on top of something very similar to 3 Aces, which is a very high-grade epithermal or hydrothermal quartz vein system. It’s very rich.
https://www.abenresources.com/site/assets/files/4303/justin_location.567x0-is.jpg
We’ll know when we get the assays. If they come back the way I think, we’ll be setting up a program for next year. That’s a good project to have in the shoulders between the Forrest Kerr or before the Chico mine’s down in the winter. We can’t really get into the Forrest Kerr until June-July, so we can get up into this region in the interim and keep moving them forward. We’ve got three really good projects to work on, but our flagship is definitely Forrest Kerr because the audience is there. It’s an area play. We all love area plays. That’s where we stand right now.
Maurice Jackson: Well, speaking of the Forrest Kerr, let’s focus our discussion today on the Forrest Kerr. We have some exciting news; what can you share with us?
James Pettit: We have a new zone. We’ve been working and concentrating on the North Boundary Zone, but this season we drilled three holes to the south of the North Boundary Zone. It was a kilometer and a half south. We put in these three holes because we’re trying to buy time, so we could get more assays back because our concentration is the North Boundary Zone and we needed guidance from some of the assays. We did do that, but we decided to drill where we did because there is a geochem anomaly and target that we wanted to test and it was coincidental with an old geophysical survey that showed something promising.

Geophysical anomalies are interesting, but certainly not like a geochem where you actually get the gold in the sample and that’s why you’re there. You have a good geophysical and geochem target to work with, and it turned out that we did the right thing. We’ve hit something there. It’s not as high-grade as the North Boundary appears to be, but it’s broad and it’s mineralized. I’ll use the best of the three holes, hole 21. You’ve got almost 380 meters in that hole is well mineralized, primarily gold, from trace level of 0.1 all the way up to 5 grams every interval.


The way we set it up, it’s almost like a graph. You very rarely see that much continuous mineralization like that. Well, it’s a lot of important information about the tenure of mineralization in that region. That’s definitely has our attention. We need to drill more holes there. We’ll get to it next year. The season’s definitely winding down up there right now, but it’s going to give us a lot of info.
Plus, we have now flown the entire valley using an EM geophysical survey, which encompasses both boundary zones to the north and south. We’re actually just waiting for the results and the interpretation of the survey. We’ll take that information at increased amount of geochem sampling that we’ve done, as well as all the assay results that we’ll have for the season. We’ll use that and compile some significant information for next year and work up our next series of targets.
Maurice Jackson: This is quite intriguing, exciting, any adjective you like to associate with it. Congratulations, sir. Now prior to this week’s press release, Aben Resources was able to successfully complete a financing and secured a major shareholder. Share the details with us, sir.
James Pettit: The first hole we put out this year was spectacular. It had an interval of 10 meters of roughly 38 grams. I mean that’s spectacular in itself, but within that was six meters of 62 grams gold. That’s like two ounces. Spectacular results. That got the market’s attention. The stock really moved up. The interest for financing was immediately apparent. We did announce a $4.2 million financing and half of it was taken by a fellow named Eric Sprott, who is a bit of a gold legend.
He started Sprott Securities, which now has a big presence in Toronto and also a big presence in Carlsbad, California. He is the consummate and ultimate gold bug. He loves gold and is not afraid to take a big stand in an early-stage deal like this. This is the exploration phase. This is potentially where you can absolutely make the most. You’re in at a price that seems very cheap and the market cap is low and you have this discovery. From that point on, you want to keep it growing and the market reacts correspondingly. He’s well aware of that. He’s not afraid to take a shot. He does it with a number of companies.
But when he gives his blessing to it, it’s pretty substantial. Then we also raised another million dollars after that largely because his name was now attached to the original financing, so we raised another just short of a million dollars flow through. The company now has just over $7 million. We’ve basically got next year’s program paid for.
Maurice Jackson: That leads to my next question, what is the burn rate and does Aben Resources plan to return to the market in the foreseeable future for another financing?
James Pettit: Well, the second question’s answer is no, we won’t. We don’t need to. Our burn rate varies from where we are in the area if we’ve got things on the go, the drill program, etc., our burn rate, and I’m just talking about basically our G&A and marketing burn rate, that can grow to $200,000 a month. Then the field work is always budgeted. This year we had budgeted about $1.5 million and we increased it by about $1 million. This year all in all we spent about $2 to 2.2 to 3 million. I haven’t got the finals number in. That’s all in for that project. We doubled the size of the drilling program.
We’re getting really close to shutting down, but I don’t see it going over that. For the G&A side, the operations of the office in Vancouver in marketing because we do. It’s important to spend money on marketing. We travel a lot marketing this project. That runs about $200,000 and varies up to $250,000 a month. Then when we aren’t working, everything obviously slows down, but then we are still marketing because we want people to know what we achieved. We always have goals. We want the market to understand we’re achieving the goals. I think that’s quite important.
Maurice Jackson: Indeed it is. Switching gears onto management. Aben’s management team has a proven pedigree of geological and business acumen. I want to focus on potential amalgamations in the sector should this occur. Share some of the past successes of management rewarding their shareholders on previous arbitrage successes.

James Pettit: Sure. Well, our chairman Ron Netolitzky, he’s like a serial M&A guy. The market really watches what he does. In the past, for example, he was in on the discovery of Snip and Eskay Creek up in this area. He’s got a very, very big following of people all over the world who have followed him through his career and starting there. He’s also very successful in Saskatchewan as well, specifically in M&A, Eskay and Snip. Snip was sold to Cominco way back and then Eskay ended up in Barrick’s hands.
Since then, there’s Copper Canyon, which he and Tim Termuende, who’s also on the board, sold that to Novagold and that became part of the Galore Creek Project, which is now in the hands of Teck and Newmont. My background, even though I’m not a geologist, is I started a company called Bayfield Ventures and eventually sold it in 2014 to New Gold as part of its Rainy River Project. The three of us have a pretty good background of what’s required. We’re always in contact. We maintain contact with majors all the time. I think given what’s happening in the Golden Triangle, majors are coming back. They’re starting to look again.
Last year Goldcorp did a deal with Colorado Resources just on a financing basis, $7 million. That was a surprise move, but it shows the interest I think. Osisko’s looking around there. Kinross is looking in the area. Barrick has showed its interest again. I think they actually have a buy back into the Snip deal because Skeena has got their hands on it and they’ve been working on it and trying to resurrect another zone in the Snip Mine. That’s our background. I think it stands out to be honest with you with the amount of M&A that’s been done between the three of us.
Maurice Jackson: Talk to us about the share price. The market is rewarding value speculators.
James Pettit: Absolutely. This is the level to enter in this market. Speculators want to be involved with a company that’s active, has good projects, good people, etc. Then take a position and wait for them to do what they say they’re going to do. In our case, last year was the discovery of the North Boundary Zone. This year was the reaffirmation of it with a tremendous hole that you could really say is the discovery hole. We need to make it bigger now. That’s our job. That’s where you get this big appreciation in stock price based on speculation.
Then going forward as you put out more and more results, the market will go up and down and follow the results. I’m seeing that this year as opposed to last year, which was as soon as you finished drilling or came out with results and you got too late into September going into October, that market’s sold off. It just sold off because tax loss season is coming and they just wanted to be out of whatever they were doing. Because once you’re finished, it’s a long cold winter to get through and you’re sitting on a stock. Like last year, we went back down to $0.10.
That’s not going to happen this year because I’ve got two other projects that are good and we’ve got a really good shareholder base now. We have so much liquidity this season. We ran from roughly $0.10, maybe $0.12 up to $0.50. Now it’s settled back in the low to mid $0.20s now. It’s trading good volume. I think probably since July or beginning of August we’ve traded 150 million shares. That’s fantastic.
Maurice Jackson: That’s quite impressive actually. Yes.
James Pettit: It’s really very impressive. We put out a bunch of holes before this most recent one around that discovery zone. They were less impressive. They were really good. They’re all very well mineralized. They just weren’t 30 some odd grams. Those that wanted that to be repeated sold out and that just meant there’s a whole lot of people who came into the market that they sold out, other people bought it. We’ve got a really good floor here, the $0.20 to $0.25 range. I think basically it’s a buy all day long. We still got 24 holes to put out.
Maurice Jackson: Yeah. We’re one of those other buyers. Speaking of the stock price, if I may just interject here, Warren Buffett and Rick Rule, they’re noted for sharing how the market rewards speculators that are prepared. In particular, and I’m going to paraphrase them, that you should not purchase a stock if you weren’t willing to see the price reduce 30% or more and be willing to purchase more. Now we’re on record, we purchased Aben Resources at $0.42 and we’re active buyers at current prices and we’re confident that the value proposition in our opinion continues to increase.
Mr. Pettit, before we close, multilayered question here, what is the next unanswered question for Aben Resources, when should we expect results, and what determines success?
James Pettit: The next unanswered question really would be how big is this and how robust is this boundary zone, including north and south. So far we’ve tapped into two zones. The very first priority target we had was the North Boundary Zone. Well, it generally was the boundary zone and we started in the north end and boom, hit it right away. When we prioritized the target zone, this overall property, the Forrest Kerr, we did it based on a compilation study of all the historic data. We came up with about 12 areas we want to go test. We’re still on the first one. Two years later we’re still in the first one. This boundary zone is four kilometers long and two kilometers wide.
It’s all based on geochem. There’s a big geochemical survey that’s been done there. We’ve added to it now and now we’ve completed the airborne. We could be there for a while. I think we’re just touching on it now. We’ve hit a few sweet spots. One’s confirmed as a sweet spot, the South Boundary Zone. I think by next year when we do some more holes we’re going to be surprised, but I think there’s going to be a lot more sweet spots there. We’re going to focus and vector in on where did this mineralization come from. That’s really what our job is. Figure it all out, get the structure identified and where it came from.
We know there’s at least three mineralizing events in the area, and we know there’s at least four ages of rock. That tells us there’s been four major events that have happened. With three of them, in came the fluids that brought the gold. Let’s find some of those feeders.
Maurice Jackson: Well, Mr. Pettit, we’ve covered the good. What keeps you up at night that we don’t know about?
James Pettit: Keeps me up at night? Well, being a good sleeper, not much keeps me up at night. Being in this business so long, I’m used to it. There’s always risks. What would scare me is we hit nothing for the rest of the holes. That would be a concern. I don’t foresee that. As long as everything stays on course, we’re good. I don’t really have a concern that would keep me awake at night.
Maurice Jackson: The last question I have for you, sir, is what did I forget to ask?
James Pettit: Most people ask me where do I think we’re going to go with what’s remaining this season? Obviously, I don’t have results. I don’t know, but I think we’re going to be pleasantly surprised. I think things are looking good. I think we’re in the right area for sure. Absolutely the right area. This is a very robust mineralizing system that we’re looking at. We’re right between the two big structural systems that we want to be in. I think for a discovery profile, we’ve got a really good one.
Maurice Jackson: Mr. Pettit, for someone listening that wants to get more information on Aben Resources, what is the website address, sir?
James Pettit: The website address is www.abenresources.com.
Maurice Jackson: As a reminder, Aben Resources trades on the TSXV symbol ABN, and on the OTCQB symbol ABNAF. For direct inquiries, please contact Don Myers at 604-639-3851. That number again is 604-639-3851. He may also be reached at info@abenresources.com.
As a reminder, Aben Resources is a sponsor of Proven and Probable and that we are proud shareholders of Aben Resources for the virtues conveyed in today’s message.
Last but not least, please visit our website www.provenandprobable.com where we interview the most respected names in the natural resource space. You may reach us at contact@provenandprobable.com.
James Pettit of Aben Resources, thank you for joining us today on Proven and Probable.
Maurice Jackson is the founder of Proven and Probable, a site that aims to enrich its subscribers through education in precious metals and junior mining companies that will enrich the world.
Disclaimer:
Proven and Probable LLC receives financial compensation from its sponsors. The compensation is used is to fund both sponsor-specific activities and general report activities, website, and general and administrative costs. Sponsor-specific activities may include aggregating content and publishing that content on the Proven and Probable website, creating and maintaining company landing pages, interviewing key management, posting a banner/billboard, and/or issuing press releases. The fees also cover the costs for Proven and Probable to publish sector-specific information on our site, and also to create content by interviewing experts in the sector. Monthly sponsorship fees range from $1,250 to $4,000 per month. Proven and Probable LLC does accept stock for payment of sponsorship fees. Sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
The Information presented in Proven and Probable is provided for educational and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. YOU SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY DECISION, FINANCIAL, INVESTMENTS, TRADING OR OTHERWISE, BASED ON ANY OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THIS FORUM WITHOUT UNDERTAKING INDEPENDENT DUE DILIGENCE AND CONSULTATION WITH A PROFESSIONAL BROKER OR COMPETENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum AT YOUR OWN RISK.”
All Rights Reserved.