Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Novo shareholders, do not vote your shares yet

Bob Moriarty
Archives

Nov 13, 2018
I am at the end of a four-day trip to see Novo Resources’ projects at Karratha and Egina. I am leaving for London in about 24 hours but won’t be home until Saturday night. As soon as I get home I will do a full report on what I have learned on this trip. As an interested shareholder or potential shareholder, you need to read what I have found out before voting or taking any action.
Novo has their Annual General Meeting on the 5th of December. They have sent out the voting Proxies and some shareholders have already started to vote. I highly encourage you to NOT VOTE until you read what I have to say.
A Toronto group is trying to take over the board with the intention of stripping off the assets into two other companies leaving Novo owners holding an empty shell. If you vote before you know all the facts you are cutting your own throat.
I know a lot of shareholders all the way to the top are angry at the decline in price from $8.80 to $1.97 and they would like to start seeing scalps hanging from their mantelpiece but Novo has made far more progress in a year than any company I have ever seen. You want to know about it and then make an intelligent vote.
Do not even think about letting the Toronto Mafia take over control of Novo just to carve it into small pieces. I was humping through the outback in 105.8-degree temperature yesterday to learn what the future for Novo was. I came within a couple of minutes of heat stroke just so I could see their progress. You want to know what I know and I will post it early next week.
Until then do not under any circumstances vote your Novo shares.
Novo Resources
NVO-V $1.97 (Nov 12, 2018)
NSRPF $1.50 OTCQX 163.7 million shares
Novo Resources website
###

Categories
Base Metals Exclusive Interviews

GROUP ELEVEN RESOURCES | Using the ‘Big Think’ to Find Zinc in Ireland

Bart Jaworski, Director and CEO of Group Eleven Resources sits down with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable to discuss his companies exploration for zinc in Ireland. Listeners will be introduced to the unique value proposition Group Eleven Resources of the largest land position of any explorer or miner in Ireland. All together encompassing approximately 3,200 sq km, or 320,000 hectares or nearly 800,000 acres, which hosts 2 flagship projects the Stonewall and the Ballinalack respectively.

VIDEO:

AUDIO:

TRANSCRIPT:

Original Source: https://www.theaureport.com/article/2018/11/12/using-the-big-think-to-find-zinc-in-ireland.html

Source: Maurice Jackson for Streetwise Reports  (11/12/18)

Maurice JacksonBart Jaworski, CEO of Group Eleven Resources, talks with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable about his company’s exploration efforts in Ireland.

Maurice Jackson: Joining us today is Bart Jaworski, the CEO and director of Group Eleven Resources Corp. (ZNG:TSX.V; GRLVF:OTCQB), which is known for advanced stage zinc exploration in Ireland.
Mr. Jaworski, for someone new to the story, who is Group Eleven Resources and what is the thesis you are attempting to prove?
Trend Map
Bart Jaworski: Well, our overall thesis is that by Group Eleven Resources having the largest land position in the richest country for zinc in the world, that being Ireland, we have a very substantiated vision, and that vision is to discover the next big zinc deposit in the country.
We already have the second and third largest undeveloped zinc occurrence in the country, that being the Stonepark current resource and the Ballinalack historical estimate, and those are second only to Glencore’s very substantial Pallas Green deposit, which is one of the largest undeveloped zinc deposits in the world.
People-wise, of course, you need people with the right mind-set and experience to drive towards this goal of discovery. And we certainly have that part covered with MAG Silver as a strategic backer and people like Peter Megaw and Dan MacInnis involved, as well as,] very experienced Irish geologists like John Barry, David Furlong and Dr. Mark Holdstock, who have spent most of their careers exploring for zinc in this country.
Maurice Jackson: Before we discuss the unique value proposition of Group Eleven Resources, I would like to begin our discussion today at the 10,000-foot level regarding zinc, it’s a metal that is not on a lot of radars. What can you tell us about the zinc supply and demand fundamentals?

Source: TradingEconomics.com (US$/tonne)

Source: Scotiabank (The Daily Mining Scoop)
Bart Jaworski: Zinc demand is roughly 14 Mt/year, so that’s about US$40 billion/year turnover (at current prices). Zinc is the fourth most consumed metal, after iron, aluminum and copper. The price of zinc was on fire in 2016 and 2017—roughly doubling from 70c/lb to $1.60/lb; then in 2018, the price took a bit of a breather, falling to about $1.00/lb in September and now starting to rise again towards the $1.20/lb level.
Zinc is primarily used for galvanizing steel, which means making steel rust proof and that then feeds the construction and automotive sectors. Zinc is also an essential nutrient for embryonic growth and normal metabolic processes inside the human body.
So that’s a bit about the demand side. On the supply side this is where things get interesting. A number of mines around the world have been shutting down because they’ve run out of ore or because they are no longer economic to run because, for example, they’ve been starved of capitalized for too long, etc. Lisheen, Galmoy and Century are a few examples of large mines that have been depleted over the last few years.
This has led to a shortage in mine supply, which in turn has led to diminishing global inventories—which are now down to levels we haven’t seen since 2007/2008 and remember, back then, prices reached as high as $2.08/lb. So the question becomes why are prices relatively muted now, despite these multi-year inventory lows? Well, I think the key issues are the trade war rhetoric, Chinese slow down fears and of course, the threat of a supply response.
Now obviously, no one has a crystal ball, but I suspect trade war talks will conclude constructively or at least I hope so. The Chinese economy, I suspect, still has a number of very large buffers at its disposal and one has to wonder if the trade talks with the U.S. do indeed falter the Chinese government could notionally just double-down on internal infrastructure growth again bolstering its Belt and Road initiative even further, for example.
On the supply response, as a former mining analyst, I definitely learned over the years that slippage on getting new mines up and running happens more often than not. So you always want to take a haircut to guidance on start-ups. Then there is the question of Chinese supply, which accounts for about half of world’s mine supply. Historically it has been the case that whenever zinc price went up, Chinese supply would go up as well, leading to a moderation of zinc prices.
This hasn’t been the case so far this cycle. The reason is that China has imposed a number of strict environmental regulations on industry, including mining, over the last year or two. The effect has been that a lot of small “mom and pop” zinc mines in China have been shut down and that has suppressed the supply response from China in a big way.
So, that’s the crux of the market.
There is one other key bright spot that I believe is starting to show great promise and that is the evolution of zinc batteries. I think this could be a potential game-changer for the industry. The background here is that zinc was always an ideal metal for batteries since Edison’s time 100 years ago; however, the problem has always been “rechargeability,” you couldn’t recharge a zinc battery without needles growing inside the cell and quickly bursting the battery.
A few years ago a scientific breakthrough by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory changed all that and this was written up in the prestigious Science magazine in April 2017; by the way, I recommend people take a look. With the advent of 3D lattice technology, electric charges can now be dissipated homogeneously enough to prevent needle growth and whamo! Zinc now has the potential to compete and offset the likes of Li-ion batteries. That’s pretty exciting.
Now there are small zinc batteries for cars and small equipment, etc., which I don’t think will have much impact on zinc demand. Then there are the large zinc batteries aimed for grid power storage and here is where we could definitely move the needle significantly on annual zinc demand.
A great example of these large zinc batteries is NantEnergy, which is run by a California-based billionaire named Patrick Soon Shiong. He’s developed a Zinc-Air battery, which run on photons, zinc and air; and he’s demonstrated he can successfully run dozens of cell phone towers and villages completely off the grid in Africa and other regions. There is a great video on Bloomberg interviewing Mr. Soon Shiong on this technology, plus the New York Times has recently written it up as well.

Source: NantEnergy
Maurice Jackson: Group Eleven Resources projects are strategically located in Ireland, provide us with some historical context on the relationship between zinc and Ireland.

Bart Jaworski: Ireland is estimated to be No 1 in terms of zinc found per square km, so it’s a very prospective country. It also hosts some of the world’s largest zinc deposits (e.g., Boliden’s Navan mine and Glencore’s Pallas Green deposit). It’s infrastructure-rich and has year-round tidewater for shipping. The product is clean and you’re close to consumer. Irish zinc concentrates tend to be very good quality. European smelters are around the corner in Norway, Sweden, Belgium, etc.
Politically Ireland is a safe, first world jurisdiction with security of tenure and rule of law. And lastly, the Fraser Institute, which is the only think tank that ranks the world’s mining jurisdictions, ranks Ireland No 1 in terms of Policy Perception Index for five years running. So Ireland has all the ingredients you’d want.
One key aspect to add is that over the last 70 years of mining history in Ireland, a general rule of thumb of what it takes to break-even economically in Ireland is what is known as “10 and 10” or 10 Mt at 10% Zinc+Pb combined. That reflects the infrastructure and tidewater (so in more remote part of the world were you need to truck in your diesel and truck out your concentrates; you may need 50–100 Mt to break-even. In Ireland you typically need much less, which is very comforting to know).

Source: Boliden (location of zinc smelters in green)
Maurice Jackson: Bart, now that we know the virtues of exploring for zinc in Ireland, how much of a land position does Group Eleven Resources have in Ireland?
Bart Jaworski: We have the largest land position of any explorer or miner in Ireland. All together we hold approximately 3,200 sq km, or 320,000 hectares or nearly 800,000 acres. This gives us the dominant position over two geological basins, which gives us the ability to think big and think outside the box, and this greatly aides our exploration approach.

Source: Group Eleven (G11 licenses in orange)
Maurice Jackson: You mention approach, is there anything different that you are doing that others are not?
Bart Jaworski: Well, yes, absolutely! Our “Big Think” approach is what really makes us different. Essentially, we are tearing up the old geology textbooks and putting them back together again using a very open minded and thorough approach to exploration by systematically conducting detailed data compilation. Mining data in Ireland goes back all the way to the 1200s and beyond and we are coupling that with cutting edge exploration techniques such as seismic surveys, airborne geophysics, ionic leach soil sampling, etc.
Now, not just anybody can have the “Big Think.” You can’t have the “Big Think” without the ground position, right? Because if you come up with a great idea, it’s likely on someone else’s ground and you can’t do anything about it. You also can’t do the “Big Think” without the right people—big picture thinkers—and that’s again where the likes of Peter Megaw and Dan MacInnis, both from MAG Silver, come in, as well as deep Irish bench-strength with the likes of Dr. Mark Holdstock, John Barry and David Furlong.
Maurice Jackson: A virtue of having the largest ground position in Ireland is that Group Eleven has two flagship projects. Let’s delve into them shall we. Mr. Jaworski, introduce us to your first flagship project, the Stonepark and the unique value propositions it presents.

Note: Red and Black outlines are G11. Blue outline is Glencore

Note: This map is a zoom-in on the Pallas Green/Stonepark area; shows the Carrickittle and Limerick South prospects, which may be a quasi-mirror image to the small red blobs to the north of Pallas Green
Bart Jaworski: Well, at Stonepark we are very excited because we are right next door to Glencore’s Pallas Green deposit, and we think we might have at least some of the key mineralizing faults from that deposit trending onto our ground. Our ground, by the way, covers nearly the entire prospective geology in this area, outside of Glencore’s ground. We have by far the largest land position in this region much bigger than Glencore’s area and we cover about 1200 sq km or 300,000 acres.
We also already have a maiden resource 43-101 compliant in the Inferred Category on our ground totaling 5mt @ 11% Zinc+Pb (Stonepark deposit). That is located only about 1km away (very close) from Glencore’s Pallas Green deposit, which hosts about 44mt @ 8% Zinc+Pb.
Our deposit is about 200–400m deep. whereas Glencore’s Pallas Green is 300–1300m deep, with its new discovery called Caherline about 10mt @ 10% Zinc+Pb at the deepest part of that range (i.e., towards 1300m). We know Glencore has been actively drilling at Pallas Green since early 2017. So from the above you can see that our Stonepark deposit is much shallower and about 30–40% higher grade.
That’s a good starting point.
But the key is this! This is an emerging camp. The discoveries here at Pallas and Stonepark are relatively new and yet this is already the most metal-endowed region within all of Ireland, outside of Boliden’s Navan deposit. And yet the main mineralization structures (or faults) have not yet been found. It’s a complete mystery.
Usually in Ireland, the zinc occurs butted up against a fault. But in this camp the main structure appears to be further away, suggesting that what has been discovered to date is actually the periphery of the system. Thus, the heart may be lurking somewhere underneath, in what we call the Limerick volcanics.
So the question becomes how do we find the center of the system? And this is where our preliminary drilling and the Tellus survey come in. We announced last week the start of a preliminary 1500–2000m drill program, which will be primarily aimed at answering the big geological questions on the architecture of this camp. If we hit some mineralization too, that’s great, but the primary aim is geological.
We’re going to couple this data with a large ongoing airborne survey that is currently being flown by the Irish Geological Survey. It’s called Tellus and it comprises flying 2,500 sq km or 620,000 acres or so, covering our ground, Glencore’s ground and our nearby Silvermines ground and using three state-of-the-art detection methods all together, which are radiometrics, magnetics and electro-magnetics.
This information will be publicly available early next year and will hopefully tell us where the major faults are and how they line up with the known mineralization in this camp. Now we already have our suspicions on where this key fault corridor might be—one clue is that the main Pallas Green body seems to trend in a NW orientation; this is from an academic paper that was published in 2015.
If you continue that trend towards the south you line up perfectly with our Carrickittle and our Limerick South prospects. At Carrickittle, for example, there are about a half dozen historical holes that intersected about 5m @ 12% Zinc+Pb and they have been largely forgotten about since the late 1960s.
However, now that we know about Pallas Green and Stonepark, these 1960s prospects are starting to look at lot like the small satellites you see just outside the Pallas Green deposit to the north, which poses an interesting question: Do we have a “quasi-mirror image” down to the south?
So this is one of key ideas we are working on and that is what we’ll be working on as part of the “Big Drill of 2019.”
Maurice Jackson: Let’s move north now and discuss your second flagship project, Ballinalack. What has the company excited there?

Note: above shows regional cross-section across Ireland, demonstrating that the zinc (red) occurs in two prospective horizons (blue and yellow) at Ballinalack. We have BOTH of these horizons (This is unique, given if you move north, you lose the blue layer; if you move south, you lose the yellow layer.)
Bart Jaworski: At our second flagship project, Ballinalack, we also have an exciting idea that we will be testing as part of the Big Drill of 2019. It is located about 50km away from Boliden’s giant Navan zinc mine, which has approximately 100 Mt @ 10% Zinc+Pb; it’s mostly mined out now, but still operating. It’s the biggest mine in Europe and considered one of the top five zinc deposits in the world.
Ballinalack is unique as it’s still close enough to Navan to have well-developed Navan Beds on the property in addition to the other prospective horizon called the Waulsortian limestone. In fact, Ballinalack is the only known zinc occurrence in Ireland that has significant mineralization in both horizons.
Interestingly, in the 1970s, when Ballinalack was discovered, the old-timers only drilled down to about 300m to define the historical estimate, which by the way totals 7.7 Mt @ 7.3% Zinc+Pb, which is not too far off from our 10 and 10 rule of thumb.
So drilling beyond 300m was considered “very deep” at that time. Now, of course, mining reaches much deeper, for example, at Boliden and Pallas Green, drilling is going down well beyond 1000m or 3300 feet. Our big idea at Ballinalack is that the Navan Beds directly underneath the historical estimate have not yet been tested for Navan-style mineralization.
Case in point, of the 30 holes historically drilled deep enough to actually intersect the Navan Beds in the vicinity of the old estimate, a surprisingly high number, about half of the holes, hit significant mineralization. And directly underneath the historical estimate the area is virtually undrilled.
So our preliminary drilling of two holes earlier this year was also primarily aimed at geology, and we successfully identified (1) that cross-faults exist and they seem to have a lot more to do with mineralization than ever recognized before, and (2) that the Ballinalack fault is much steeper than previously thought, which shows definitively how previous drilling was missing the target.
By the way, Group Eleven Resources intersected 10m @ 10% Zinc+Pb in an area of known mineralization, which is also comforting, plus a zone of mineralization in the Navan Beds.

Note: The orange zone (4a-4e) is our hanging-wall Navan Bed target (which has been virtually undrilled) and targets 1, 2 and 3 are our footwall Navan Bed targets where historical drilling has yielded significant mineralization worthy of follow up (all the red dots are the historical holes, which were drilled deep enough to intersect Navan Beds, and half of them hit. ‘n/a’ means not assayed for silver.
Maurice Jackson: What are your plans going forward at Ballinalack?
Bart Jaworski: We will be relogging and in some cases re-assaying some of the historical core with the aim of sharpening our understanding of the architecture of this area even further, and we will then do more drilling in 2019 as part of the Big Drill.
Maurice Jackson:
Are these brownfields explorations that the company is undertaking?
Bart Jaworski: If “brownfield” means an area that was previously mined, then the answer is no. However, I think in this case, you are referring to the notion that in these areas we have seen significant heavy lifting already done on the exploration side by previous operators, than definitely yes.
Maurice Jackson:
For someone new to the term brownfields, please share how that improves the probability of discovery.
Bart Jaworski: Well, with the heavy lifting already done for us, this puts us in great position to allow us to get up the learning curve much quicker than if we had to drill all those initial holes ourselves. So we’re walking on the shoulder of a giant amount of historical work, and if you infuse that with cutting edge technology and truly open minded thinking—that’s where the magic happens.
Maurice Jackson: For current and prospective shareholders, the story doesn’t end with zinc. You have recently discovered some silver at the Ballinalack. How was “Big Think” responsible for the discovery and share the results with us.

Note: Drill core from G11 recent drill hole (G11-1344-02) at Ballinalack
Bart Jaworski: Correct, at Ballinalack only some of the historical intervals were ever assayed for silver and those that were often had good silver numbers in them, say between 20–100 g/t, and our highest was about 380 g/t. So we know there is silver in the system, but that was never calculated historically.
I see that as a potential sweetener to the story, which has yet not been borne out. Also at Stonepark and the broader Limerick basin, we have the idea that because you have a lot of volcanics intruding limestones, you might expect to see some overlooked deposit types, which can host a much higher precious metal component, for example, CRD deposit types that you see in Mexico.
That is I believe what captured the imagination of Peter Megaw. I think all that I’ve mentioned above speaks to the open-minded approach that we have and hence the “Big Think.”
Maurice Jackson: What is management’s philosophy, are you looking to build mines or are you focused on exploration?
Bart Jaworski: Similar to most juniors, our exit strategy is to make a large discovery and then sell it to the highest bidder. We are not interested in becoming miners.
Maurice Jackson: Switching gears, I’ve learned from some of the most serially successful in industry—from Rick Rule, Doug Casey, Jayant Bhandari, Mickey Fulp and Bob Moriarty—that the people running the business are equally if not more important that the latent material in the ground. Mr. Jaworski, please introduce us to your board of directors and management team and the unique skill sets they bring to the Group Eleven Resources.

Bart Jaworski: We have four on the board currently.
Dan MacInnis is our chairman. (a) He is the retired CEO of MAG Silver (and currently sits on the MAG board) (b) Dan has over 40 years of experience and has been involved with seven discoveries during his career including Duck Pond and Juanicipio (c) Interestingly, Dan worked in Ireland for five years back in the late 1970s/early 1980s with Noranda, so he definitely knows the lay of the land in Ireland.
Alessandro Bitelli is our chair of the Audit Committee. He is currently the CFO of Lundin Gold, and interestingly was the CFO of RedBack when it was taken over for $10 billion by Kinross back in 2010.
Brendan Cahill is a lawyer and all round very sharp guy. He’s the CEO of Excellon Resources, which is mining the Platosa silver deposit in Mexico.
On the management side:
We have John Barry and David Furlong, who I’ve mentioned earlier in our discussion. Both are Irish geologists. ex-Rathdowney Resources (which is another European zinc development company). John was the founder and CEO of Rathdowney. So both John and David have deep experience with Irish-style zinc deposits and with operating in Ireland.
Dr. Mark Holdstock is a very well-known geologist in Ireland. He recently joined us (in early 2018). He led the team that discovered the 20-Mt SWEX extension of the Navan orebody.
So John, David, Mark and myself, we’re a home team. All of us live in the country we’re operating in and that’s different from many juniors and a big plus because we have our ear close to the rail.
And now onto the advisers:
Peter Megaw is the brainchild behind MAG Silver’s success in Mexico with the Juanicipio discovery. Peter is the chief exploration officer at MAG. and he’s a big help on our “Big Think” initiative.
We also have John Prochnau and Frank Hallam as advisers. John Prochnau is on Doug Casey’s Exploration Hall of Fame actually for his Esquel and Alligator Ridge discoveries. John also worked on our Ballinalack project back in the 1970s.
Frank Hallam has a lot of experience in M&A with the majors and has been involved with over a $1 billion in financings over his career. Last but far from least are Shaun Heinrichs, our CFO, and Spiros Cacos, our VP Investor Relations.
Maurice Jackson: Tell us about Bart Jaworski; what makes him qualified for the task at hand?
Bart Jaworski: I’m an exploration geologist and ex-mining equity analyst. I have about 24 years of experience since 1994, my first year in the field. I was an analyst for about 12 years. Initially, I began with Raymond James in Vancouver for about nine years and then for over three years with Davy in Ireland. I’ve been on a lot of site visits and met with a lot of CEOs and VP Ex’s over that time frame. I also covered many exploration and mining companies over the years.
The reason I ended up in Ireland is because my wife, who is Irish, wanted to move back home after being in Canada with me for nine years. And that’s how I ended up at Davy in Dublin covering the UK listed golds, plus Rio Tinto and the iron ore sector. As an exploration geo I discovered the original soil anomaly at Coffee Creek, which later became a multi-million ounce gold deposit (which was taken out for $0.5 billion when Goldcorp took over Kaminak). Going back a little further, I also helped discover industrial minerals in the Iskut area.
Maurice Jackson: Tell us about your capital structure.

Bart Jaworski: We have just under 60 million shares outstanding. So at our current share price (14c) our market cap is only CA$8.4 million or about US$6 million. About 20 million warrants and options outstanding: more than half of those are set to expire this December. Cash: our last Quarterly Financials have $3.2 million in the till. We have no debt.
Maurice Jackson: Let’s discuss some numbers: What is your burn rate?
Bart Jaworski: Burn is about $100k–$130k/month, so call it roughly $1.5 million per annum. So our runway is still fairly comfortable, at least another 12 to 15 months doing what we need to do, depending on how hard we step on the gas pedal.
Maurice Jackson: Do you have institutional Investors at this point?
Bart Jaworski: Yes, we’ve been lucky enough to garner the support of about a dozen institutions, mostly during the IPO, but some pre-IPO and some post-IPO. Most well-known institutions include Sprott, US Global, Galileo and Logiq.
Maurice Jackson: What is the float?
Bart Jaworski: About half our 60 million shares are owned by high-net worth investors, which is about 30 million shares. The rest is owned by MAG, Teck, the funds and insiders.
Maurice Jackson: Are there change of control fees? If yes, please convey the terms.
Bart Jaworski: There are no change-of-control fees for M&A transactions but there are fees associated with management being fired by the board without cause, which is fairly standard.
Maurice Jackson: When is the last time you purchased shares and at what price?
Bart Jaworski: I actually bought shares last just after our last press release last week at a price of 13c and 12.5c. I believe at least one other insider bought shares on the heels of last weeks’ press release as well.
Maurice Jackson: Any redundant assets such as patented mining claims and or reversionary interests, meaning are Group Eleven Projects 100% owned by Group Eleven Resources?
Bart Jaworski: We don’t have any patented mining claims in Ireland. We own all our licenses 100% except at Ballinalack where we have 60% interest with the remainder owned by a large Chinese zinc producer called Nonfemet. At Stonepark, where we own roughly 77% and the remainder owned by a small Irish exploreco. Important to note, these joint venture interests are participating, i.e., they have to pay their share of exploration costs or they get diluted down.
Maurice Jackson: All right, sir, you’ve survived the storm. Mr. Jaworski, multilayered question, what is the unanswered question for Group Eleven Resources, when should we expect results, and what will determine success?

Source: G11, October 2018 (L to R: David Furlong, John Barry, Bob Moriarty and Bart Jaworski)
Bart Jaworski: Results, we are currently doing a “preliminary drilling” campaign (1500–2000m) and we should have results from that over the coming weeks and months. The results of the Tellus survey will also be forthcoming early next year and that will tell us a lot. We will then couple the two datasets, i.e., the drill data and the airborne data and that should lead to very high-priority drill targets, which will be part of our Big Drill in 2019. A few months ago we put out a maiden resource at Stonepark measured 5mt @ 11% Zinc+Pb combined. We are working on updating the Ballinalack historical estimate, but we are not sure yet if we can upgrade to a current estimate without re-drilling, but we are looking into it so that something else to be aware of.
MAURICE JACKSON: What keeps you up at night that we don’t know about?
BART JAWORSKI: Well, I’m an optimist, as long as people keep remembering the lessons of Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations. I think we’ll be ok and the world economy will keep on growing and with it, so will the prosperity of humanity. Other than that I try not to sweat the small stuff.
Regarding Group Eleven, obviously exploration is a risky and cyclical business, so one needs to be aware and cognizant of that. However, with high-risk comes high-rewards, and that’s really what I’m focusing on as a shareholder myself.
Maurice Jackson: Finally, what did I forget to ask?
Bart Jaworski: I guess one important element of the Irish exploration landscape is the support from the government, specifically iCRAG, which stands for the Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences. This is a government-industry-academia partnership that is well-funded and has a number of very smart people working on a number of fronts. One of the main remits of iCRAG is to help companies like Group Eleven find the next zinc mine in Ireland.
So, interestingly, the individual who recently stepped into the role of CEO and Director at iCRAG is a gentleman by the name of Dr. Murray Hitzman. Dr. Hitzman was once at the White House shaping Science and Technology policy, as well as, the head of the Colorado School of Mines and more recently at the U.S. Geological Survey. He is one of the leading experts on Irish-style zinc deposits and has written many academic papers on the subject. When Murray was announced as the Head of iCRAG, I personally thought this was a major signal by the Irish government and a catalyst, really, for future discoveries in Ireland.
Maurice Jackson: For someone listening that wants to get more information on Group Eleven Resources the website is here. And as a reminder, Group Eleven Resources trades on the TSX-V: ZINCG and on the OTCQB: GRLVF.For direct inquiries please contact Spiros Cacos at 604 630 8839 Ext. 503 and he may also be reached at s.cacos@groupelevenresources.com.
And last but not least please visit our website provenandprobable.com, where we interview the most respected names in the natural resources space. You may reach at contact@provenandprobable.com.
Bart Jaworski of Group Eleven Resources, thank you for joining us today on Proven and Probable.
Maurice Jackson is the founder of Proven and Probable, a site that aims to enrich its subscribers through education in precious metals and junior mining companies that will enrich the world.

Disclosure: 
1) Maurice Jackson: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: None. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: None. Proven and Probable disclosures are listed below.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: MAG Silver. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article.
Proven and Probable LLC receives financial compensation from its sponsors. The compensation is used is to fund both sponsor-specific activities and general report activities, website, and general and administrative costs. Sponsor-specific activities may include aggregating content and publishing that content on the Proven and Probable website, creating and maintaining company landing pages, interviewing key management, posting a banner/billboard, and/or issuing press releases. The fees also cover the costs for Proven and Probable to publish sector-specific information on our site, and also to create content by interviewing experts in the sector. Monthly sponsorship fees range from $1,000 to $4,000 per month. Proven and Probable LLC does accept stock for payment of sponsorship fees. Sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
The Information presented in Proven and Probable is provided for educational and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. You should not make any decision, financial, investments, trading or otherwise, based on any of the information presented on this forum without undertaking independent due diligence and consultation with a professional broker or competent financial advisor. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum at your own risk.
Images and graphs provided by the author.

Categories
Energy Oil & Gas

Oil & GAS | Jericho Oil Provides STACK Drilling and Completion Update

TULSA, Okla. and VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Nov. 12, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Jericho Oil Corporation (“Jericho”) (TSX-V: JCO; OTC PINK: JROOF) is pleased to provide an update regarding its ongoing participation in its Oklahoma STACK Joint Venture (“STACK JV”).  The Company’s 2018 development plan within the STACK continues to focus on the delineation and de-risking of its acreage position for the Meramec and Osage formations.  Currently, the STACK JV now has an interest in four Osage formation wells and two Meramec formation wells.  An update is provided below on the drilling, completion and flowback of our most recent Osage and Meramec wells:

Drilling Operations:

  • Trebuchet 21-23N-10W #1H (Operator: Armor Energy; Major County – Osage)
    — 48.0% Working Interest
    — Drilling ahead in the lateral section – ~90% of the planned total measured depth
    — To-date, we have seen tremendous strides in the rate-of-penetration (“ROP”) on the Trebuchet relative to our first Osage formation well (the Swordpear 15-23N-10W #1H) attributable primarily to an improved drilling-bit set-up and specific lateral geo-steering.
    — The ROP in the lateral on the Trebuchet is approximately 1.6x-1.8x the Swordspear at the same measured depth putting downward pressure on total rig days for the well
    — The fracture stimulation of the well is expected to begin in late-November / early December

Flowback Operations:

  • Valkyrie 6-19N-12W #1H (Operator: Staghorn Petroleum; Blaine County – Meramec)
    — 23.5% Working Interest
    — 35 fracture stimulation stages successfully performed and currently in flowback
    — After only a few days on flowback, we are extremely pleased with the resulting downhole pressures and total fluid flowback

The STACK JV’s operations on its second Meramec formation well (the Valkyrie) on its western flank and a second Osage formation well (the Trebuchet) on its northern most STACK acreage is a continuation of the Company’s delineation plan for the STACK.

Brian Williamson, CEO of Jericho Oil, stated, “The Company continues to deliver on its two-pronged strategy of delineating and de-risking our STACK acreage for the Meramec and Osage formations,” adding, “our second Meramec and Osage formation wells have given our team the added knowledge and confidence in our world-class acreage position.  We continue to learn from each well and have put forth best practices on our Trebuchet well to decrease drilling costs in the lateral section.  We are excited to provide further updates on the production of these wells by year-end.”
Jericho also reports that it has retained Equity Guru Media Inc. for a 6-month editorial marketing contract. Chris Parry owns www.equity.guru and is a two-time Webster Award winning journalist who has been featured in the pages of The Vancouver Sun, The Province, National Post, Spin, Hollywood Reporter, FHM, Stuff, and Stockhouse. He was the first business journalist to identify and focus on the move to marijuana as an investment opportunity, and started Equity.Guru as a venue for honest, no punches pulled coverage of the North American public markets. The terms of the contract are for C$8,333.33 per month for 6 months of coverage commencing November 1, 2018.
About Jericho Oil Corporation
Jericho Oil (www.jerichooil.com) is focused on domestic, liquids-rich unconventional resource plays, located primarily in the Anadarko basin STACK Play of Oklahoma.  Jericho’s primary business objective is driving long-term shareholder value through the growth of oil and gas production, cash flow and reserves.  Jericho has assembled an interest in 55,000 net acres across Oklahoma, including an interest in ~16,000 net acres in the STACK Play. Jericho owns a 26.5% interest in STACK JV.
Jericho’s current operations are focused on the oil-prone Meramec and Osage formations in the STACK.  The Jericho team applies advanced engineering analyses and enhanced geological techniques to under-developed resource areas.
Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, with operational headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Jericho trades publicly on the TSX-Venture (JCO) and OTC (JROOF). Jericho owns its net acre position in Oklahoma through, and participates in the STACK JV through, one or more wholly owned subsidiaries.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements: This news release includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Canadian securities laws. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual events and results to differ materially from Jericho’s expectations include risks related to the exploration stage of Jericho’s project; market fluctuations in prices for securities of exploration stage companies; and uncertainties about the availability of additional financing.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

CONTACTS:
Adam Rabiner,
Director, Investor Relations
1.800.750.3520
investorrelations@jerichooil.com

Categories
Base Metals Energy Oil & Gas Precious Metals Project Generators

RICK RULE | Companies Often Regard Shareholders As Unsecured Creditors — Instead Of Partners

Rick Rule: Companies Often Regard Shareholders As Unsecured Creditors — Instead Of Partners

Nov 08, 2018 12:28 pm
By Tekoa Da Silva
I had the chance to sit down once again with Rick Rule, the president and CEO of Sprott U.S. Holdings, Inc. The topics of discussion covered what can often “go wrong” with general and administrative expenses, change of control provisions, changes in corporate strategy (referred to as “mission drift” in this context), and uniquely structured insider private placements.
 

Watch the Video

Subscribe here to access Sprott Media video content

“Many junior mining companies don’t regard shareholders as partners, they regard them as unsecured creditors,” explained Rule. “[So] anticipating outcomes based on the self-interest of the executives is the best way to understand [how] things are going to unfold.”
Commenting on general and administrative expense items, Rule noted that, “I have seen several circumstances where $10 million market cap companies with $800 thousand in the treasury were paying the CEO $450 thousand a year. In other words, the CEO’s salary alone was taking up 5% of market cap — on an annual basis. That means the CEO, him- or herself  (if you assume they have $800 thousand left in the company), will bankrupt the company in [less than two years].”
Speaking toward change of control provisions, Rule recounted that, “Many people raise money from private parties with the view that they’re going to make a discovery and sell the discovery. And what you learn is that many management teams get paid twice. I have seen, in a number of circumstances, management teams [install] change of control provisions … where if the company is sold (which was their stated intention), they get compensation on sale equal to five years of their average salary and bonus expense, and five years of ancillary expenses — things such as rent and health benefits.”
“That’s one of the reasons why some management teams are willing to entertain merger and acquisition,” Rule added, “where their only participation in the company is as option holders. I’ve had a lot of bad experience, frankly, with change of control provisions, which is one of the reasons I study them.”
On the subject of oddly structured insider private placements, Rule explained that, “Private placements, where the company loans the executives the money to [buy] the private placement, … [are] the private placements … I really dislike. In other words … the private placement is just a recycle that allows the management team to sell the stock and strip the warrant — which is an artificial way of increasing their [own] options position. And that’s fairly common.”
When asked how one can protect themselves from the aforementioned (and more), Rule explained that, “One of the ways you can defend yourself … is by limiting your speculations (irrespective of apparent prospectivity or promotion) to companies that are headed by people who have been serially successful in the past … With a class-1 team at the helm [you’re] more likely to be successful.”
“As a speculator,” Rule concluded, “your gains are [usually] hard won. I’m reminded of the scientists’ observation that the harder they work, the luckier they get.”
To watch the full video interview with Rick Rule, the president and CEO of Sprott U.S. Holdings, Inc. click here.
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like Rick Rule: Companies Often Regard Shareholders As Unsecured Creditors — Instead Of Partners on Facebook

Recent Articles:

The Platinum Opportunity – Part 2
Rick Rule: Tremendous Discoveries In “One of the Last Great Exploration Frontiers”
Rick Rule: The Price of This Commodity Goes Up — Or The Lights Go Out
2018 Sprott Platinum Series: Fission Uranium Corp. (TSX: FCU, OTCMKTS:FCUUF)
Rick Rule: Large Miners “Crowding” Back Into Exploration as “Every Day You Mine, Your Business Gets Smaller”

Sprott U.S. Media, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprott Inc., which is a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and operates through its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries: Sprott Asset Management LP, an adviser registered with the Ontario Securities Commission; Sprott Private Wealth LP, an investment dealer and member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd., a US full service broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC; Sprott Asset Management USA Inc., an SEC Registered Investment Advisor; and Resource Capital Investment Corp., also an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. We refer to the above entities collectively as “Sprott”.
The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.
Forward-Looking Statement
This report contains forward-looking statements which reflect the current expectations of management regarding future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, and similar expressions have been used to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current beliefs with respect to future events and are based on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements could vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors should be considered carefully and undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this document are based upon what management currently believes to be reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation and Sprott does not assume any obligation to update or revise.
Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any fund or account managed by Sprott. Any reference to a particular company is for illustrative purposes only and should not to be considered as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell nor should it be considered as an indication of how the portfolio of any fund or account managed by Sprott will be invested.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author’s as of the date of this commentary, and are subject to change without notice. This information is for information purposes only and is not intended to be an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination by Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the objectives of the investor, financial situation, investment horizon, and their particular needs. This information is not intended to provide financial, tax, legal, accounting or other professional advice since such advice always requires consideration of individual circumstances. The products discussed herein are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested.
Generally, natural resources investments are more volatile on a daily basis and have higher headline risk than other sectors as they tend to be more sensitive to economic data, political and regulatory events as well as underlying commodity prices. Natural resource investments are influenced by the price of underlying commodities like oil, gas, metals, coal, etc.; several of which trade on various exchanges and have price fluctuations based on short-term dynamics partly driven by demand/supply and also by investment flows. Natural resource investments tend to react more sensitively to global events and economic data than other sectors, whether it is a natural disaster like an earthquake, political upheaval in the Middle East or release of employment data in the U.S. Low priced securities can be very risky and may result in the loss of part or all of your investment.  Because of significant volatility,  large dealer spreads and very limited market liquidity, typically you will  not be able to sell a low priced security immediately back to the dealer at the same price it sold the stock to you. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investing in foreign markets may entail greater risks than those normally associated with domestic markets, such as political, currency, economic and market risks. You should carefully consider whether trading in low priced and international securities is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Sprott Global, entities that it controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may hold positions in the securities it recommends to clients, and may sell the same at any time.
Copyright © 2018 Sprott US Media, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you requested information about the Sprott Group.
Our mailing address is:

Sprott US Media

1910 Palomar Point Way Ste 200

CarlsbadCA 92008-5578

Add us to your address book

Categories
Precious Metals

PRECIOUS METALS | Former J.P. Morgan Trader Pleads Guilty To Gold and Silver Manipulation

Former J.P. Morgan Trader Pleads Guilty To Gold and Silver Manipulation
Written by Chris Marcus of Miles Franklin
In recent years, as precious metals analysts have attempted to reconcile the routinely counterintuitive price action in the gold and silver markets with the underlying fundamentals, rumors have swirled that J.P. Morgan’s trading desk has been manipulating the price. And this week, a former J.P. Morgan trader plead guilty to exactly that.
“A former precious metals trader (John Edmonds) at a United States bank (Bank) pleaded guilty in a proceeding unsealed yesterday to commodities fraud and a spoofing conspiracy in connection with his participation in fraudulent and deceptive trading activity in the precious metals futures contracts markets.
As part of his plea, Edmonds admitted that from approximately 2009 through 2015, he conspired with other precious metals traders at the Bank to manipulate the markets for gold, silver, platinum and palladium futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange Inc. ”
Of course this is not the first set of charges brought in the precious metals manipulation saga. Deutsche Bank has been caught. And recently the Bank of Nova Scotia was caught as well.
But given all of the attention in the precious metals community that has focused around J.P. Morgan, largely due to the incredible research by Ted Butler and others, the news of this latest case is worth taking note of.
Perhaps because one of the other items of note in the Department of Justice press release was that Edmonds also admitted “that he learned this deceptive trading strategy from more senior traders at the Bank, and he personally deployed this strategy hundreds of times with the knowledge and consent of his immediate supervisors.”
Keep in mind, these are the words of the Department of Justice. Not mine.
And it seems clearly written to indicate that this was not some sort of random one-off event. But rather suggests that it was indeed common knowledge within the firm. And that there are people at higher levels within the bank that were aware of, if not actual participants in the illegal trading behavior.
Which is interesting, because in the Deutsche Bank case, the impression I got from the official release was that part of the agreement included cooperating and helping the regulators go after some of the other players involved. And again with this latest release, the Department of Justice mentioned that “the investigation of deceptive trading practices by others involved in this scheme is ongoing.”
So what does this actually mean to those invested in the silver market?
Perhaps it will turn out to be just the latest piece of evidence confirming that the market is indeed manipulated, to once again just get largely ignored. Yet it’s also possible that maybe there is some will to actually bring integrity to these markets. And that further cases are on the way.
Yet regardless of what the regulators do, the fact that what has long been viewed as conspiracy theory is now becoming more fully documented in a legal setting makes me wonder how much longer it will be before more investors take notice.
Hedge fund managers John Paulson, Ray Dalio, and Jeffrey Gundlach, as well as others have taken sizable positions in gold. And I often wonder how investors like these and others would react if they were simply aware of what’s actually been going on in the silver market.
Especially because the silver market is so small relative to gold, let alone to the stock and bond markets, that it wouldn’t take all that much additional buying power to bring this paper shorting scheme to a halt. And with this latest news, it seems like the once long held secret is becoming public knowledge at a rapidly accelerating pace.
So while it remains to be seen when the final knockout punch will occur, hopefully this news puts to rest any concern silver investors may have still held regarding whether the market was indeed being manipulated, or if people were just speculating on what they couldn’t understand.
My personal view is that this latest case is still just the tip of the iceberg. And if the regulators really are intent on getting to the heart of the matter (especially given that they can get access to the trading records), I don’t see how any legitimate investigation would have any trouble finding conclusive evidence.
Only time will tell whether the ultimate resolution is due to the regulators, or a market participant with deep pockets and a will to force a short squeeze. But this latest news once again confirms that all of the necessary conditions for a significantly higher silver price remain confirmed and in place.
If you have any questions about this article, or about precious metals, you are as always welcome to contact me at cmarcus@milesfranklin.com.
Or come visit in person at our upcoming “Austrian Economics Meet and Greet + The Big Short Screening” in Denver, Colorado, this Sunday November 11!
Archived Newsletters
International Storage
Private Safe Deposit Boxes
Unencumbered / Segregated Storage
About Miles Franklin
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David’s son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin’s primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do.
We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, Jim Sinclair, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
For your protection, we are licensed, regulated, bonded and background checked per Minnesota State law.
Miles Franklin
801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 834
Wayzata, MN 55391
1-800-822-8080
Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved.
Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Maritime Announces the Appointment of 3 New Board Members

Vancouver, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – November 8, 2018) – Maritime ResourcesCorp. (TSXV: MAE) (“Maritime”) On the completion of the recently closed $3.5 million financing with Dundee Resources Ltd. and Sprott Inc., Maritime is pleased to announce the appointment of three new independent board members to further enhance the team. The new appointees include Mr. John Hayes as Director who will also serve as Chair of the Board, Mr. Garett Macdonald and Mr. Mark Ashcroft as directors of the Company. The new directorships take effect immediately and will work with our existing team as the Company advances the high grade Hammerdown gold project and further develops its Whisker and Orion exploration projects. Brief biographies of the directors are highlighted below.

Mr. John Hayes, M.Sc., MBA, P. Geo – Chair of the Board, Director

John is a professional geologist with over 17 years of industry experience ranging from regional surveys to advanced exploration. In addition, John has many years of capital markets experience. John graduated from Memorial University of Newfoundland with an Honours Bachelor of Science in Geology (1989) and a Master of Science in Geology (1997). He also holds an MBA from Dalhousie University (2003). He is a member (P. Geo.) of the Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Newfoundland and Labrador. John was a mining analyst and Managing Director for BMO Capital Markets from 2003 until his retirement in April 2014. In his role with BMO, John covered precious and base metal companies globally from exploration to production stages. John joined Osisko Mining Inc in June 2016, where he served as the Senior Vice President of Corporate Development until March 2018.

Mr. Garett Macdonald, MBA, P. Eng.  Director

Garett is a professional mining engineer with extensive experience in project development and mine operations with over 22 years of industry experience. He has managed large technical programs through the concept, feasibility and into construction stages and has senior management and board level experience with several public companies. Most recently as Vice President of Project Development for JDS Energy and Mining, Garett was responsible for leading the Curraghinalt Feasibility Study for Dalradian Resources, a high grade, narrow vein Curraghinalt gold project in Northern Ireland, recently acquired by Orion Mine Finance for $537M. Garett also held roles in mine operations and engineering earlier in his career with senior Canadian mining firms Suncor Energy, and Placer Dome Inc. From 2009 to 2013 he served as Vice President of Operations for Rainy River Resources prior to the $310M sale of Rainy River to New Gold Inc. Garett is currently the President & CEO of Tower Resources and a director of First Cobalt, Aurelius Minerals and Gungnir Resources. He holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Western University’s Ivey Business School and a Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) from Laurentian University in Sudbury.

Mr. Mark N.J. Ashcroft, P. Eng. – Director

Mark has been involved in various capacities in the global mining industry and the North American and European debt and equity markets since 1990. Mark is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Aurelius Minerals Inc. Previously, Mark served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Stonegate Agricom Ltd. from August 2008 to September 2014. From 2007 to 2008, Mark worked at Versant Partners, where he was responsible for successfully developing their mining finance business in sales, trading and corporate finance. Prior to joining Versant Partners, Mark had been employed since 2003 with Toll Cross Securities Inc., a boutique institutional firm in Toronto where he became Managing Director and Head of Investment Banking. From 2001 to 2003, Mark was a member of the Mining and Metals Team at Standard Bank’s New York office where he was responsible for providing metals trading and project financing solutions to mid-tier developers and producers in Canada and Latin America. From 1999 to 2000, he was a member of the Mining and Metals Team of Barclays Capital, a leading provider of project finance to the mining industry. From 1996 to 1998, he worked in Mines Technical Services at Inco Limited’s Ontario Division, where he qualified as a Professional Engineer in Ontario. various operating roles in North and South Mark holds his Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) from Laurentian University and a Master of Science (Finance, Regulation and Risk Management) from the ISMA Centre of the University of Reading.

Mr. Fulcher, President and CEO commented“We are extremely pleased to be moving Maritime forward in such a positive way with both the financing for $3.5 million completed by two significant groups in Dundee and Sprott and the additions to our board. The three new members have board expertise in all aspects of the mining and financial industry and come with a proven track record of developing, financing and operating mining projects. With these new board members joining the Maritime team we will continue to diligently advance our 100% owned Green Bay Hammerdown gold project towards production.”

The Company would also like to announce that Mr. Alan Williams has resigned as Chairman and Director of the Company effective October 29th, 2018. Alan was one of the original founding directors of the Company in 2007 and became Chairman in 2017, he has remained active both on the board and as the Company’s Chairman since then. On behalf of the board and employees of the Company, we thank Alan for his years of dedication and wish him all the best on his future endeavors. Alan will continue to act as an advisor to the Company.

About Maritime Resources Corp:

Maritime Resources holds 100% of the Green Bay Property, located near Springdale, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The property hosts the past producing Hammerdown gold mine and the nearby Orion gold deposit. As well the Lochinvar base metals/precious metals deposit sits to the north east end of the Rumbullion deposit.

Based on the scenario presented in the Company’s March 2017 PFS, the Hammerdown mine is expected to produce approximately 180,000 ounces over a 5 year life at a cash cost of $558 CDN with an all in cost (including capital, sustaining capital and operating cost) of $955 CDN per ounce of gold. Total estimated upfront capital is $35M CDN, and the project has a pre-tax NPV8% = $72M CDN with an IRR of 47% based on a toll milling arrangement at the nearby Nugget Pond Mill. The after tax NPV8% = $44M CDN with an IRR = 35% based on a $1250/oz gold price.

Further information on the Green Bay Gold Property can be found on our website along with the NI43-101 compliant Technical Report filed on SEDAR on July 11, 2013 at www.maritimeresourcescorp.com.

Bernard H. Kahlert, P.Eng. is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical disclosure contained in this release.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

Doug Fulcher

President, CEO

Forfurther information, please call:
Doug Fulcher
Telephone: (604) 336-7322
info@maritimeresourcescorp.com

The TSX Venture Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Statements in this press release, other than purely historical information, including statements relating to the Company’s future plans and objectives or expected results, may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions and are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties inherent in resource exploration and development. As a result, actual results may vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements:
Certain information included in this press release, including information relating to future financial or operating performance and other statements that express the expectations of management or estimates of future performance constitute “forward-looking statements”.  Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding copper, gold and silver forecasts, the financial strength of the Company, estimates regarding timing of future development and production and statements concerning possible expansion opportunities for the Company.  Where the Company expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief are based on assumptions made in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis.  Such assumptions include, without limitation, the price of and anticipated costs of recovery of, copper concentrate, gold and silver, the presence of and continuity of such minerals at modeled grades and values, the capacities of various machinery and equipment, the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices, mineral recovery rates, and others.  However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Such risks include, but are not limited to, interpretation and implications of drilling and geophysical results; estimates regarding timing of future capital expenditures and costs towards profitable commercial operations.  Other factors that could cause actual results, developments or events to differ materially from those anticipated include, among others, increases/decreases in production; volatility in metals prices and demand; currency fluctuations; cash operating margins; cash operating cost per pound sold; costs per ton of ore; variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans; reserves and/or resources; the ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; operational risks inherent in mining or development activities and legislative factors relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land use, title and permits, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.  Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements and the forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.  The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as at the date hereof and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any such forward-looking statements or any forward-looking statements contained in any other documents whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under applicable security law.

Categories
Blog

MINING | Sprott Inc. Declares Third Quarter 2018 dividend

TORONTO, Nov. 08, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sprott Inc. (“Sprott” or the “Company”) (SII.TO) today declared an eligible dividend of $0.03 per common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, payable on December 4, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 19, 2018.

About Sprott

Sprott is an alternative asset manager and a global leader in precious metal and real asset investments. Through its subsidiaries in Canada, the US and Asia, the Corporation is dedicated to providing investors with best-in-class investment strategies that include Exchange Listed Products, Alternative Asset Management and Private Resource Investments. The Corporation also operates Merchant Banking and Brokerage businesses in both Canada and the US. Sprott is based in Toronto with offices in New York, Carlsbad and Vancouver and its common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol (SII.TO). For more information, please visit www.sprott.com.

Investor contact information:

Glen Williams
Managing Director
(416) 943-4394
gwilliams@sprott.com

Categories
Base Metals Precious Metals Project Generators

PROJECT GENERATOR | Riverside Resources New Look, Continues with the Same Value Proposition


 
Dear Subscribers, we welcome you to visit Riverside Resources new website: www.rivres.com.
The logo has changed but the value proposition and commitment to increasing shareholders value remains.

Riverside Resources Inc.

Head Office – Vancouver

550 – 800 West Pender Street,
Vancouver BC,
V6C 2V6
Telephone: 778-327-6671
Fax: 778-327-6675
Toll Free: 1-877-RIV-RES1 (748-7371)

For investor questions please call or email:

Communications Team 778-327-6671
Email info@rivres.com

Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Anaconda Mining Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results; Generates $1.6 Million of Cash Flow from Operating Activities

TORONTO , Nov. 8, 2018 /CNW/ – Anaconda Mining Inc. (“Anaconda” or the “Company”) – (ANX.TO) (ANXGF) is pleased to report its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 (“Q3 2018”). The condensed interim consolidated financial statements and management discussion & analysis documents can be found at www.sedar.com and the Company’s website, www.anacondamining.com. All dollar amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

In 2017, the Company changed its fiscal year-end to December 31 , from its previous fiscal year end of May 31 . For comparative purposes, the results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 , have been compared to the three and nine months ended August 31 , 2017.

Third Quarter 2018 Highlights

  • Anaconda produced a quarterly record of 5,099 ounces of gold during Q3 2018 and has produced 14,024 ounces year-to-date in 2018. The Company is on track to exceedits 2018 production guidance of 18,000 ounces.
  • Anaconda sold 4,314 ounces of gold and generated metal revenue of $6.9 million in Q3 2018, at an average realized gold price* of $1,603 per ounce (US$1,227) . As at September 30, 2018 , the Company also had over 945 ounces in gold doré inventory, which were subsequently sold in early October.
  • Operating cash costs per ounce sold* at the Point Rousse Project in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $1,047 (US$801) and $938 (US$729) , respectively. The Company is on track to achieve its revised guidance for operating cash costs per ounce sold of less than $1,000 per ounce (~US$780) .
  • Strong revenue and lower costs enabled the Point Rousse Project to generate EBITDA* of $2.3 million for the third quarter of 2018, and $9.3 million for the first nine months of 2018.
  • On a consolidated basis, EBITDA* for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $1.2 million and $5.1 million , respectively, compared with $1.7 million and $5.3 million in the comparative periods.
  • All-in sustaining cash costs per ounce sold*, including corporate administration and sustaining capital expenditures, were $1,520 (US$1,163) and $1,418 (US$1,102) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 , respectively.
  • In the first nine months of 2018, the Company invested $6.0 million in its exploration and development projects, including $4.6 million on the Goldboro Gold Project in Nova Scotia .
  • For the three months ended September 30, 2018 , net loss was $936,755 , or $0.01 per share, compared to $324,033 , or $0.00 per share for the comparative period.
  • Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $1,337,080 , or $0.01 per share, which included transaction costs related to the takeover bid for Maritime Resources Corp. (“Maritime”) of $854,131 , or $0.01 per share. Excluding transaction costs, net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $482,949 , or $0.00 per share.
  • As at September 30, 2018 , the Company had a cash balance of $7.6 million , working capital* of $7.4 million , and additional available liquidity of $1,000,000 from an undrawn revolving line of credit facility.

*Refer to Non-IFRS Measures section below. A full reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures can be found in the Company’s Management
Discussion and Analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018

“Anaconda continues to achieve strong operational results during 2018, achieving record quarterly production of 5,099 ounces and generating a further $1.6 million in cash flow from operations, at operating cash costs of US$729 per ounce year-to-date.  Continued free cash flow from the Point Rousse Project and a robust balance sheet with a cash balance of $7.6 million continues to allow the Company to progress its growth projects, particularly at the Goldboro Gold Project where we recently announced strong increases to its Mineral Resource and an improved preliminary economic assessment.  We are well positioned in a challenging market to continue to execute our strategy as a growing gold producer in Atlantic Canada .”

~Dustin Angelo, President and CEO, Anaconda Mining Inc.

Consolidated Results Summary

Financial Results

Three months

ended

September 30,
2018

Three months
ended

August 31,
2017

Nine months

ended

September 30,

2018

Nine months

ended

August 31, 2017

(restated)

Revenue ($)

6,923,738

8,127,452

21,971,955

22,032,298

Cost of operations, including depletion and
depreciation ($)

6,237,829

7,309,870

17,335,327

20,249,983

Mine operating income ($)

685,909

817,582

4,636,628

1,782,315

Net loss ($)

(936,755)

(324,033)

(1,337,080)

(3,154,325)

Net loss per share ($/share) – basic and diluted

(0.01)

(0.00)

(0.01)

(0.05)

Cash generated from operating activities ($)

1,572,020

540,472

5,508,525

4,036,555

Capital investment in property, mill and
equipment ($)

357,834

179,471

1,738,946

966,420

Capital investment in exploration and evaluation
assets ($)

1,309,749

681,732

3,966,183

1,974,427

Average realized gold price per ounce *

US$1,227

US$1,251

US$1,289

US$1,207

Operating cash costs per ounce sold *

US$801

US$743

US$729

US$744

All-in sustaining cash costs per ounce sold *

US$1,163

US$1,017

US$1,102

US$1,034

*Refer to Non-IFRS Measures section below

Three months

ended

September 30,
2018

Three months
ended

August 31,
2017

Nine months

ended

September 30,
2018

Nine months

ended

August 31,
2017

Operational Results

Ore mined (t)

51,620

158,857

228,293

353,556

Waste mined (t)

380,580

364,380

987,354

1,075,843

Strip ratio

7.4

2.3

4.3

3.0

Ore milled (t)

120,374

119,401

350,892

335,119

Grade (g/t Au)

1.52

1.35

1.45

1.37

Recovery (%)

86.6

86.8

85.9

86.0

Gold ounces produced

5,099

4,581

14,024

12,729

Gold ounces sold

4,314

4,723

13,170

12,977

Third Quarter 2018 Review

Operational Overview

The Pine Cove Mill achieved throughput of 120,374 tonnes in Q3 2018, just 1% lower than the quarterly throughput achieved in the second quarter of 2018. Mill throughput was 1,332 tpd in Q3 2018, down slightly from the comparative three months ended August 31, 2017 . Average grade during the third quarter of 2018 was 1.52 g/t, an increase of 10% over the second quarter of 2018 due to a greater proportion of mill feed from Stog’er Tight relative to ore stockpiled from the Pine Cove Pit. The Company expects to maintain the increased grade profile through the second half of 2018, as ore feed continues to be predominantly sourced from Stog’er Tight. Higher grade combined with an average recovery rate of 86.6% during Q3 2018 resulted in record quarterly gold production of 5,099 ounces.

During Q3 2018, mine operations produced a total of 51,620 tonnes of ore from the Stog’er Tight Mine, in addition to moving 380,580 tonnes of waste for a strip ratio of 7.4 tonnes of waste tonnes to ore tonnes. The strip ratio has decreased significantly from the second quarter of 2018, when mining activity was focused on pre-production development activity, and is expected to decrease further over the life of the pit.

Mine activity in the Pine Cove Pit finished in the middle of March, and the Company has commenced planning for pushbacks to the pit, which are expected to contribute ore in 2019. The Company has now converted the Pine Cove Pit into a fully-permitted in-pit tailings storage facility, which has approximately 15 years of capacity based on a throughput rate of 1,350 tonnes per day.

Financial Results

Anaconda sold 4,314 ounces of gold during the third quarter of 2018, generating gold and silver revenue of $6.9 million , and year-to-date has sold 13,170 ounces to generate revenue of $21.9 million at an average realized gold price of C$1,659 per ounce (US$1,289) . As at September 30, 2018 , the Company also had over 945 ounces of gold doré inventory, which were sold in early October. The Company is now on track to exceedits 2018 production guidance of 18,000 ounces at operating cash costs of under $1,000 per ounce (~US$780) .

Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $4,472,273 and $12,411,876 , respectively, compared to $5,037,132 and $13,996,158 in the three and nine months ended August 31, 2017 , respectively. The decrease in operating costs was the result of lower mining costs as the operation moved 17% less material during the quarter and 15% less material in the first nine months of 2018. This was partially offset by higher processing costs, which were driven by a 5% increase in throughput during the first nine months of the year. The operating cash costs per ounce sold for the third quarter were $1,047 (US$801) compared to $956 (US$743) for the three months ended August 31, 2017 , due to higher processing costs for the quarter as well as lower ounces sold. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 , operating cash costs were $938 (US$729) , a reduction of 2% compared to operating cash costs of $996 per ounce sold (US$744) in the nine months ended August 31, 2017 .

Depletion and depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $1,714,188 and $4,853,006 , respectively, a decrease from $2,272,738 and $6,250,873 during the comparative periods. The lower depletion and depreciation was the result of lower depletion of stripping costs for the Pine Cove Pit, where mining was completed in Q1 2018. Capitalized development costs for Stog’er Tight for 2018 of $993,502 are now being depreciated from May 1, 2018 , the beginning of production.

Mine operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was $685,909 , compared to $817,582 in the comparative period of 2017. During the first nine months of 2018, the Company generated mine operating income of $4,636,628 , significantly higher than the $1,782,315 generated in the nine months ended August 31, 2017 , due to 22% lower cost of operations.

Corporate administration expenditures were $952,029 and $3,194,725 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 , compared to $1,244,616 and $2,529,289 for the comparative periods ended August 31, 2017 . The higher expenditures in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 reflect the expanded senior management team to execute the Company’s growth plans, greater market presence and investor relations activity, and the timing of certain corporate costs as a result of the change in year-end to December 31 .

The drawdown of the deferred premium on flow-through shares resulted in a recovery of $253,535 in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 , as the remaining exploration commitments from the October 31, 2017 flow-through financing were incurred in the first half of 2018.

Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2018 , was $936,755 , or $0.01 per share, compared to $324,033 , or $0.00 per share, in the comparative period, with the primary driver of the quarterly change being a net tax expense in Q3 2018 of $370,000 compared to a net tax recovery of $267,000 in the three months ended August 31, 2017 . For the first nine months of 2018, net loss was $1,337,080 , or $0.01 per share, compared to a net loss of $3,154,325 , or $0.05 per share, for the nine months ended August 31, 2017 . The improvement over the comparative period was the result of higher mine operating income, which was partially offset by higher corporate administration expenditures and share-based compensation. Net loss for the period was further impacted by the recognition of $854,131 in transaction costs related to the takeover bid of Maritime. The Company also recorded a current income tax expense of $813,445 relating to provincial mining tax and a deferred income tax expense of $660,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 (nine months ended August 31, 2017 – $59,000 and $1,996,000 , respectively).

Financial Position and Cash Flow Analysis

As at September 30, 2018 , the Company continued to maintain a robust working capital position of $7,404,989 , which included cash and cash equivalents of $7,579,958 . In addition, the Company maintains a $1,000,000 revolving credit facility with the Royal Bank of Canada . As at September 30, 2018 , the Company had not drawn against the revolving credit facility.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 , Anaconda generated cash flow from operations of $1,572,020 , after accounting for corporate administration costs. Revenue less operating expenses from the Point Rousse Project were $2,451,465 , based on quarterly gold sales of 4,314 ounces at an average price of C$1,603 per ounce sold and operating cash costs of C$1,047 per ounce sold. Corporate administration costs in the third quarter were $952,029 and there was a net increase in operating cash flows of $300,928 from changes in working capital.

During Q3 2018, the Company continued to invest in its key growth projects in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia . The Company spent $1,309,749 in Q3 2018 and $3,966,183 during the first nine months of 2018 on exploration and evaluation assets (adjusted for amounts included in trade payables and accruals at September 30, 2018 ), primarily on the continued advancement of the Goldboro Project, which included $1.5 million on the bulk sample program which commenced in August 2018 . The Company has also invested $1,738,946 year-to-date into the property, mill and equipment at the Point Rousse Project, which included capital development of $993,502 at Stog’er Tight.

Financing activities during Q3 2018 were primarily limited to the repayment of capital lease obligations and government loans. In June 2018 , the Company successfully completed a flow-through financing of $4,465,290 . The Company has also received cash proceeds of $116,000 from the exercise of stock options in fiscal 2018.

Restatement of Prior Period Financial Information

As part of the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2017 , the Company undertook a comprehensive review of the capitalization and units-of-production depletion calculations for its production stripping asset and property, mill infrastructure and equipment and deferred taxes and discovered that certain errors had been made. As a result, the Company amended the treatment of these balance sheet items resulting in a restatement of prior periods.

The amounts of each adjustment and a reconciliation between the previously published consolidated statement of comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , have been presented in Note 4 of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

ABOUT ANACONDA
Anaconda Mining is a TSX-listed gold mining, development, and exploration company, focused in the prospective Atlantic Canadian jurisdictions of Newfoundland and Nova Scotia . The Company operates the Point Rousse Project located in the Baie Verte Mining District in Newfoundland , comprised of the Stog’er Tight open pit mine, the Pine Cove open pit mine, the Argyle Mineral Resource, the fully-permitted Pine Cove Mill and 7-million tonne capacity tailings facility, and approximately 9,150 hectares of prospective gold-bearing property. Anaconda is also developing the Goldboro Gold Project in Nova Scotia , a high-grade Mineral Resource, subject of a 2018 a preliminary economic assessment which demonstrates a strong project economics.

The Company also has a wholly owned exploration company that is solely focused on early stage exploration in Newfoundland and New Brunswick .

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, or “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, or “will be taken”, “occur”, or “be achieved”. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is made, and is based on a number of assumptions and is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Anaconda to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including risks associated with the exploration, development and mining such as economic factors as they effect exploration, future commodity prices, changes in foreign exchange and interest rates, actual results of current production, development and exploration activities, government regulation, political or economic developments, environmental risks, permitting timelines, capital expenditures, operating or technical difficulties in connection with development activities, employee relations, the speculative nature of gold exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities of grades of resources, contests over title to properties, and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined as well as those risk factors discussed in the annual information form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 , available on www.sedar.com. Although Anaconda has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Anaconda does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

NON-IFRS MEASURES

Anaconda has included certain non-IFRS performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Operating Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold – Anaconda calculates operating cash costs per ounce by dividing operating expenses per the consolidated statement of operations, net of silver sales and aggregate sales by-product revenue, by the gold ounces sold during the applicable period. Operating expenses include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration as well as royalties, however excludes depletion and depreciation and rehabilitation costs.

All-In Sustaining Costs per Ounce of Gold – Anaconda has adopted an all-in sustaining cost performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from current operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company’s definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013 . The World Gold Council is a non-regulatory, non-profit organization established in 1987 whose members include global senior mining companies. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

The Company defines all-in sustaining costs as the sum of operating cash costs (per above), sustaining capital (capital required to maintain current operations at existing levels), corporate administration costs, sustaining exploration, and rehabilitation accretion and amortization related to current operations. All-in sustaining costs excludes capital expenditures for significant improvements at existing operations deemed to be expansionary in nature, exploration and evaluation related to growth projects, financing costs, debt repayments, and taxes. Canadian and US dollars are noted for realized gold price, operating cash costs per ounce of gold and all-in sustaining costs per ounce of gold. Both currencies are considered relevant and the Company uses the average foreign exchange rate for the period.

Average Realized Gold Price per Ounce Sold – In the gold mining industry, average realized gold price per ounce sold is a common performance measure that does not have any standardized meaning. The most directly comparable measure prepared in accordance with IFRS is gold revenue. The measure is intended to assist readers in evaluating the revenue received in a period from each ounce of gold sold.

Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) – EBITDA is earnings before finance expense, deferred income tax expense and depletion and depreciation.

Point Rousse Project EBITDA is EBITDA before corporate administration, transaction costs, write-down of exploration assets, share-based compensation, and all other expenses (income).

Working Capital – Working capital is a common measure of near-term liquidity and is calculated by deducting current liabilities from current assets.

SOURCE Anaconda Mining Inc.

View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2018/08/c6986.html

Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Orezone Announces Key Appointments and Provides Bomboré Development Update

OTTAWA, Nov. 08, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.V(“Orezone” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide a development update on its 90%-owned Bomboré Gold Project including key additions to its project development team in Burkina Faso.  The Company has recently completed the recruitment of a project leadership team consisting of senior mining professionals with track records of success in West Africa.

“We are delighted to have assembled an exceptional team to continue the advancement of Bomboré into the next stage of development.  Orezone is advancing the project with commencement of detailed engineering, early-stage construction activities including upgrades to the camp and surrounding infrastructure, along with progress on its Resettlement Action Plan (“RAP”).  We believe with the team that is now in place, the Company is well positioned to construct Bomboré into one of the next operating gold mines in Burkina Faso with commercial production expected to commence by the end of 2020,” said Patrick Downey, President and CEO.

Key Project Appointments

The Company has appointed André Baya as General Manager and Jason Snow as Project Manager to its Bomboré management committee.  They will lead the project’s execution and operational readiness efforts.

André Baya, General Manager

Mr. Baya is a seasoned mining executive who oversaw the successful financing, construction and commissioning of the Yaramoko gold mine in Burkina Faso as General Manager from between 2014 to 2017.  He has spent over 20 years in senior managerial roles and has led four mining projects in three African countries over the past decade.   His previous experience in Burkina Faso will prove invaluable to the Company.

Jason Snow, Project Manager

Mr. Snow has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry, mainly in foreign jurisdictions in West Africa and the Middle East.  He is proficient in handling all aspects of construction activities for a greenfield mining project and most recently, spent three years as the Construction Superintendent for the Fekola gold mine in Mali prior to joining Orezone.

Other New Hires

The Company has also bolstered the managerial talent in supporting departments through the recruitment of senior department heads in the areas of engineering, finance, health and safety, and environment.  These individuals have many years of relevant and recent experience in the construction and operation of similar mining operations located in Burkina Faso.

Bomboré Development Update

Since completion of the updated Bomboré definitive feasibility study (“2018 DFS”) in July 2018, the Company has advanced on several fronts in the on-going development of the Bomboré project.

Engineering and Mine Design

The Front-End Engineering and Design (“FEED”) has commenced under the overall management of Lycopodium Minerals Canada Ltd.

Further to the Company’s press release of July 9, 2018 wherein the Company identified several ongoing enhancement opportunities, the key opportunities below are now being incorporated or rapidly advanced to a decision stage.

The process plant and mine design will be based on a nominal throughput of 5.2 million tonnes per annum (“Mtpa”) as opposed to the 4.5 Mtpa used in the 2018 DFS. This plant expansion will allow immediate feed of material that was originally to be stockpiled for later processing during the mine life.  More importantly, this expanded throughput capacity will provide flexibility for possible future feed of oxide material from the Restricted Zones which are now well-advanced in the permitting process, and also allow room for addition of higher-grade sulphide material in the future. This increased throughput will immediately improve overall annual LOM production.

The Company is also currently completing a detailed review with its consultants on the potential to mine select zones of higher-grade Measured and Indicated (“M&I”) sulphide resources located at P17S as well as immediately below existing oxide reserves. The 2018 DFS was based entirely on mining oxides and as such, these M&I sulphide resources are not yet included in the Company’s current mineral reserve estimate for Bomboré.  The evaluation of this higher-grade sulphide enhancement opportunity would not impact the project development timeline established in the 2018 DFS.  The higher-grade sulphide material would only be accessed starting in Year 3 of the current mining schedule when the oxide operation is well established.  With the addition of a separate small crushing and grinding circuit, these sulphides could potentially be part of an incremental higher-grade feed to the existing oxide CIL circuit without the need to expand the oxide plant or upgrade infrastructure.  Significant historical testwork has already been completed on this sulphide material including pit wall geotechnical work and metallurgical testwork.

The Company is currently anticipating to proceed with a more detailed evaluation of this separate incremental sulphide grinding circuit and further details will be provided once completed and available.

RAP

The Company continues to make progress on Phase 1 of the RAP.  Contracts have been awarded to select contractors experienced in RAP projects in Burkina Faso and construction is planned to commence later in Q4-2018 which remains within the original schedule.

The local communities continue to be overwhelmingly supportive of the project and are actively involved in the RAP process with several of the local population, who were recently trained as artisans as part of the project’s CSR programs, being hired for the construction of the villages and associated infrastructure.

Early Works

Early works for the main plant water supply system are also in progress with construction activities planned for late Q1-2019, including works associated with the river crossings and main water diversion weir systems.

Once Phase 1 RAP is completed in Q2-2019, the main project earthworks will commence.

Qualified Persons

Tim Miller, SME and COO, Pascal Marquis, Geo and SVP and Patrick Downey, P.Eng and CEO of Orezone, are Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 and have reviewed and approved the information in this release. Orezone has also prepared and filed a current technical report on the Bomboré Project titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Study of the Bomboré Gold Project Burkina Faso” with a date of 23 August 2018, and which is available at www.sedar.com and at www.orezone.com. The technical report includes relevant information regarding the effective dates and the assumptions, parameters and methods of the mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Bomboré Project, as well as information regarding data verification, and other matters relevant to the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release.  Readers should also refer to the annual information form of Orezone for the year ended December 31, 2017 and other continuous disclosure documents filed by Orezone since January 1, 2018 available at www.sedar.com, for this detailed information, which is subject to the qualifications and notes set forth therein.

About Orezone Gold Corporation

Orezone is a Canadian company with a successful gold discovery track record and recent mine development experience in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The Company owns a 90% interest in Bomboré, a fully permitted, low cost development stage gold project in Burkina Faso, situated 85 km east of the capital city of Ouagadougou, adjacent to an international highway.

For further information please contact Orezone at +1 (613) 241-3699 or visit the Company’s website at www.orezone.com.

Orezone Gold Corporation

Patrick Downey
President and Chief Executive Officer
Tel:  1 778 945 8977 / Toll Free: 1 888 673 0663

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “potential”, “possible” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may”, “will”, “could”, or “should” occur.

This news release includes certain forward-looking statements. These include statements regarding, among others, construction of Bomboré into an operating gold mine with commencement of commercial production by the end of Q4-2020, realization of project enhancement opportunities including expansion of plant processing capacity to 5.2Mtpa, successful permitting of the Restricted Zone oxides, and the potential of processing higher grade sulphide material as supplemental feed into the 2018 DFS oxide mine plan and the associated plant improvements required. In addition, forward-looking statements include the anticipated start of RAP construction later in Q4-2018, start of early works on the project’s water supply system and river crossings in Q1-2019, and the commencement of main earthwork in Q2-2019. 

All such forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by management and qualified persons in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors management and the qualified persons believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Readers are cautioned that actual results may vary from those presented.

In addition, all forward-looking information and statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, use of assumptions that may not prove to be correct, unexpected changes in laws, rules or regulations, or their enforcement by applicable authorities; the failure of parties to contracts to perform as agreed; social or labour unrest; changes in commodity prices; unexpected failure or inadequacy of infrastructure, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, accidents and equipment breakdowns, political risk, unanticipated changes in key management personnel and general economic, market or business conditions, the failure of exploration programs, including drilling programs, to deliver anticipated results and the failure of ongoing and uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, and other factors described in the Company’s most recent annual information form and management discussion and analysis filed on SEDAR on www.sedar.com.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements.

This news release also contains references to estimates of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The estimation of Mineral Resources is inherently uncertain and involves subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation, which may prove to be unreliable and depend, to a certain extent, upon the analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Mineral Resource estimates may have to be re-estimated based on, among other things: (i) fluctuations in the price of gold; (ii) results of drilling; (iii) results of metallurgical testing, process and other studies; (iv) changes to proposed mine plans; (v) the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimates; and (vi) the possible failure to receive required permits, approvals and licenses.

Although the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are based upon what management of the Company believes are reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release and are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Subject to applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this news release.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.