Categories
Precious Metals

CHRIS MARCUS Will The Next Silver Rally Exceed The 2011 Highs

Will The Next Silver Rally Exceed The 2011 Highs
Written by Chris Marcus of Miles Franklin
While many are beginning to realize that the gold and silver markets have indeed been manipulated, it’s interesting to consider what might happen when that manipulation is resolved.
Because while the wait has been frustrating for many, that’s not to say it will not end without due reward. Especially when you think back about what actually happened in 2011, and consider some of the dynamics involved.
When silver was soaring in April of 2011 and reached $49 per ounce, there was some attention being paid by the market. CNBC added gold and silver to its bottom of the screen ticker, and even some in the mainstream were at least temporarily aware of what was happening with the metals pricing.
Yet in a recent conversation with friend who’s also a silver investor, something occurred to me that I’ve not heard anyone comment on. In particular, how even when the prices were moving, I wonder how many people actually owned gold or silver.
Keep in mind that for a bubble to form, the generally agreed-upon definition includes that a large percentage of the investment community already owns the asset. Yet in 2011 even as prices were rising, there were still relatively few investors who actually held any physical metal.
At the time I was trading equity options on the New York Stock Exchange, and outside of myself, there wasn’t anybody else I talked to on the floor who was actually buying gold or silver. In fact when I think back to my Wall Street days, I still can’t think of anyone who ever even spent any time thinking about gold and silver. Outside of if they were hearing about it from me.
So if silver went to $49 per ounce while relatively few in the greater population were actually invested, what’s going to happen when you reach the point where precious metals become a popular asset again? Especially given how there really isn’t that much physical silver to go around. Certainly not compared to the amount of paper silver that’s out there.
Some analysts (myself included) wonder whether the physical metal that’s supposed to back GLD and SLV is actually in place and being safely stored as advertised. And should there be some sort of break in the market where that turns out to not be the case, or if there’s some sort of default on the COMEX contracts, the potential for a run on the bank for actual physical silver looms large.
So if silver hit $49 per ounce without any of these conditions occurring, what kind of prices are we talking about if they do? Add on that when we finally reach the point where there is a break in the dollar and foreign creditors are looking to re-allocate their capital into sound money, where does the price of silver go then?
In recent years Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, and the Bank of Nova Scotia have all been involved in court cases with varying degrees of admissions of precious metals market manipulation. With my own internal belief being that if the primary reason silver was hammered down from $49 per ounce was due to illegal trading behavior, that the $49 level would be somewhat of a floor. With a true free market price trading somewhere north of that. Then when you factor in how that was with relatively few actually owning any gold and silver, and it becomes fascinating to think about what that price might be.
I can certainly understand the frustration many feel in waiting for this ultimate outcome. But given the fundamentals and factual developments that have occurred in recent years, it continues to seem like a worthwhile wait.
If you have questions about any of the points raised in this article, as always you are welcome to email me here. Or if you are already seeing a similar perspective and are interested in purchasing precious metals, you can do so by calling Miles Franklin at 1-800-822-8080.
In either case it will be truly stunning and fascinating to see how the market is ultimately resolved. Yet for those with the fortitude and patience to stay with their trade, I continue to believe that the payoff will be well worth the wait.
And with the Federal Reserve already starting to backtrack on future interest rate increases, which means more money printing is likely on the way (perhaps as soon as 2019), aren’t gold and silver far better options than the paper dollar and treasury alternatives?
-If you have any questions about this article, what’s happening with the Fed, or the precious metals market, you’re welcome to email me here.
-To buy or sell gold and silver call Miles Franklin today at (1-800-822-8080).
-Or get Miles Franklin’s detailed report on why the price of silver is set to explode.
Archived Newsletters


About Miles Franklin
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David’s son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin’s primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do.
We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, Jim Sinclair, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
For your protection, we are licensed, regulated, bonded and background checked per Minnesota State law.
Miles Franklin
801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 834
Wayzata, MN 55391
1-800-822-8080
Copyright © 2019. All Rights Reserved.
Categories
Base Metals Junior Mining Precious Metals Project Generators

RIVERSIDE RESOURCES Outlines Corporate Outlook for 2019

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Jan. 09, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Riverside Resources Inc. (“Riverside” or the “Company”) (TSX-V: RRI) (RVSDF) (R99.F) is pleased to provide a brief outlook for the coming year. Riverside is pleased to enter 2019 with a stable of high-quality gold, silver and copper exploration assets in Mexico. Riverside continues to have a tight share structure (less than 45M shares outstanding); increasing the potential for strong share price appreciation on new exploration successes. The list below outlines some of the key catalysts and opportunities the Company is currently forwarding:

  • Riverside has exciting drill targets that are permitted and ready for testing at multiple 100% owned projects in Mexico (including high-grade gold at Cecilia and high-grade silver at the Peñoles Project)
  • The Company has been advancing potential joint venture partnerships and is optimistic new deals can be secured to advance multiple projects simultaneously
  • Riverside expects to expand outside of Mexico during 2019, as the Company continues to grow and diversify the generative portfolio
  • Actively engaged in strategic alliance discussions with major companies, with aim of leveraging past investments and regional knowledge in Mexico
  • Partner-funded exploration expected to commence at the La Silla Project in 2019 (Sinaloa Resources)
  • New go-public transaction expected during Q1-Q2 from Croesus Gold Corp., (Riverside currently owns >5,000,000 Croesus common shares and holds a 2% NSR on the Sugarloaf Peak Project)

Listen to Riverside’s President & CEO, John-Mark Staude speak on the Company’s growth plans for 2019.
Riverside’s President and CEO, John-Mark Staude, stated: “Riverside is in a good position heading into 2019, we are focused to leverage off of last year’s work to improve the Company’s portfolio and are working up partnerships and catalysts for a positive year ahead. We have drill targets ready to go along with shares in other juniors and remain focused on delivering new accretive transactions for the Company. We are confident 2019 will be a strong rebound year for the company with momentum building during the first quarter.”

Options & Bonus Shares Granted:
On January 8, 2019 the Company granted 785,000 incentive stock options (the “Options”) to certain Directors, Officers and Consultants of the Company. The Options are exercisable at $0.17 per share for a period of 5 years from the date of grant. Options granted to individuals in their capacity as a Director vest in 3 equal instalments over 18 months and Options granted to Officers and Consultants vest in 4 equal instalments over 12 months. The Company also granted 265,000 bonus shares to certain Directors, Officers and Consultants of the Company. The Options & bonus shares were granted pursuant to the Company’s shareholder-approved stock option and bonus share plan and are subject to the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange and any applicable regulatory hold periods.

About Riverside Resources Inc.:
Riverside is an exploration company driven by value generation and discovery. The company has a strong portfolio of gold-silver and copper assets in Mexico and a tight share structure with less than 45M shares outstanding. Riverside has extensive experience and knowledge operating in Mexico and has leveraged its large database to generate a portfolio of prospective mineral properties. In addition to Riverside’s own exploration spending, the Company also strives to diversify risk by securing joint-venture and spin-out partnerships to advance multiple assets simultaneously and create more chances for discovery. Riverside has additional properties available for option, with more information available on the Company’s website at www.rivres.com.

ON BEHALF OF RIVERSIDE RESOURCES INC.
“John-Mark Staude”
Dr. John-Mark Staude, President & CEO

For additional information contact:

John-Mark Staude
President, CEO
Riverside Resources Inc.
info@rivres.com
Phone:  (778) 327-6671
Fax:  (778) 327-6675
Web:  www.rivres.com
Raffi Elmajian
Corporate Communications
Riverside Resources Inc.
relmajian@rivres.com
Phone: (778) 327-6671
TF: (877) RIV-RES1
Web: www.rivres.com

Certain statements in this press release may be considered forward-looking information. These statements can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology (e.g., “expect”,” estimates”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”). Such information involves known and unknown risks — including the availability of funds, the results of financing and exploration activities, the interpretation of exploration results and other geological data, or unanticipated costs and expenses and other risks identified by Riverside in its public securities filings that may cause actual events to differ materially from current expectations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Categories
Precious Metals

MILES FRANKLIN Is Cash In The Bank Even Riskier Than Gold?

Categories
Precious Metals

SPROTT’S THOUGHTS Gold-Backed Cryptos: Doug Casey and Rick Rule Talk Potential of Digital Currency

By Nick Giambruno

Doug Casey, Author of “Speculator” and “Drug Lord”

Advocates of sound money have dreamed of a gold-backed digital currency for many years.
Now, with the advent of blockchain technology, the dream of a viable, gold-backed digital currency is finally coming true. And the potential is enormous. Dozens of gold-backed digital currencies are sprouting up.
Peter Grosskopf, CEO of Sprott, called it “the most important thing to happen to the gold market in the last several decades.”
He was referring to the marriage of gold with the blockchain. Shortly thereafter Sprott launched Vaultchain, a gold-backed crypto it developed with its partners.
When Sprott makes a big move into the gold-backed crypto space it’s a definitive sign of where things are headed.
That’s why I recently spoke with Doug Casey and Rick Rule, both of whom are excited about what the huge potential of a gold-backed crypto.
It’s hard to think of two other people who have had more experience and success in the resource market — and gold in particular — than Doug and Rick.
Here’s what they told me:
Nick Giambruno: Rick, you’ve been in the resource market for decades. But recently we discussed how you’re looking very closely at gold-backed cryptocurrencies. It really seems to be this is where there is an intersection of the resource market and the technology of the blockchain and decentralized databases.
So, what made you interested in gold-backed cryptos?
Rick Rule: Well, first we believe that the potential audience for gold and cryptos is very similar. The people who believe that there should be mediums of exchange that aren’t government sponsored will adopt both to cryptos and gold.
Second, we saw how the distributed ledger could make the inefficiencies of the gold trade go away to the benefit of all users.
Third, we saw a circumstance where there was a proliferation of crypto products that were in and of themselves faith-based currencies, floating abstraction. Dogecoin is an example that started off as a joke, and then got a bid.
We believe that using the distributed ledger technology to make gold trading more effective was something that the market wanted, and secondly a logical extension of the Sprott brand, which is in some investors’ minds synonymous with precious metals. We already manage well in excess of $4 billion in exchange traded precious metals on the New York Stock Exchange, and thought an extension of our brand to a crypto product was a logical thing to do.
What was holding us back was the technological capability internally to cause that to occur, and when IEX (Investors Exchange) — the sort of flash boys guys — came into the equation and in fact approached us about being their partner in enabling distributed ledger and blockchain technologies in gold, that was just an offer too good to pass up.
Nick Giambruno: Doug, you’ve talked a lot about sound money over the years, so how does a gold-backed crypto play into your notion of sound money and the characteristics of it?
Doug Casey: Very well. One of the disadvantages of gold is that it’s hard to transport. While today it’s not illegal to cross borders with gold, in two separate countries on two separate continents when I was carrying about a dozen silver one-ounce coins and both times they stopped me at the x-ray machine and examined them. No problem because it was silver and they weren’t worth anything, but if they had been gold it would’ve been a problem.
So it’s not illegal to transport gold, but it’s becoming inconvenient to do so. I think that a gold-backed crypto will kiss that and make it better.
Nick Giambruno: Rick, you mentioned how the blockchain helps take away some of the inefficiencies of traditional gold warehousing companies. Can you elaborate on that?
Rick Rule: Sure. If one of your readers wanted to go out and buy, say, ten ounces of physical gold, the spot price is the reference price. But the truth is at many bullion dealers they’ll pay a 3% or 3.5% markup.
Should they change their mind two hours later and decide to sell it, they wouldn’t get spot on the sell side either. They’d get a 3% or 3.5% markdown, meaning that the simple act of buying and selling ten ounces of gold can cause the investor to experience 7% or 700 basis points of friction.
On top of that, one often pays to store and insure that gold, and they also pay for shipping and receiving.
If you eliminate the vast bulk of those transaction fees, you can see the incredible increase in economic efficiency for buying and selling gold through distributed ledger, through the blockchain.
And that was really the most important thing that appealed to us. We just wanted to make the gold trade much more efficient for those investors who believed that gold was a savings product, that gold was money.
Nick Giambruno: Doug, I personally believe there will never be a gold-backed crypto that can completely stand in for gold. There is simply no substitute for owning physical gold that you can readily hold in your hand.
However, owning large amounts of physical gold presents its own challenges. It’s hard to store securely, move long distances, and break down into smaller amounts. A gold-backed crypto can help address these drawbacks.
That said, any gold-backed crypto will have inevitably have some counterparty risk. Physical gold in your direct possession does not.
Instead of being a substitute for owning physical gold in your own possession, I believe gold-backed cryptos are complimentary tool for individuals all around the world to access sound money.
What’s your take?
Doug Casey: I think it’s a great innovation. The reasons why cryptos are catching on in the developed world are pretty obvious. We don’t need to go about that here. I think the real future for cryptos, and this is especially true of gold-backed cryptos, is going to be in the Third World, because 75% of the people on the planet have to use toilet paper currencies — like the Zambian Kwacha, the Argentine peso, or the Venezuelan Bolivar — that have little value within their countries of issuance and no value at all outside of the borders.
Especially since these people tend to understand gold, it’s tangible, it’s more understandable than just the idea of a cryptocurrency if they see it represents gold, I think this type of this is eventually going to catch fire in these Third World countries where they’ll be able to save and transfer wealth in something that’s of real value as opposed to just some locally issued government toilet paper. This is a wonderful innovation not just for us but for the little impoverished people out there in the world.
Nick Giambruno: Exactly… why would anyone abandon their wealth to a constantly depreciating government fiat currency, sitting in an insolvent fractional reserve bank when you can easily save a gold-backed crypto?
On that note, how does a gold-backed crypto help one with political diversification? Is it a new tool in the toolkit?
Doug Casey: I want to emphasize, especially for Americans, that it’s not just a question of what you have and what you’re doing in the market, but where you’re keeping these things. Everyone, not just Americans, should try to have half of their gold, cash, and investments outside of their countries of citizenship and/or residence. You don’t want all of your assets within easy reach of whatever government considers you its milk cow.
Nick Giambruno: Rick, what features does a gold-backed crypto need to be credible… redemption, reputable partners, auditability?
Rick Rule: In answer to your question, the answer is yes, all of that is important.
The first thing is that there will be and there have been numerous crypto scams where the promoters of the crypto either caused or paid to cause rapid price escalation in a token that had no intrinsic value, and whose price ultimately fell to its intrinsic value, which is zero.
It’s important that investments are made in the architecture of the distributed ledger product, and in the maintenance of the distributed ledger product.
The distributed ledger does not — contrary to popular opinion — maintain itself.
Bitcoin is an example. That whole process is sustained by miners who are rewarded with Bitcoin. In the absence of something like that a system crashes.
I think it’s important that crypto gold be redeemable and be audited.
In the case of Sprott I think one of the reasons why we were chosen as a partner is because we already manage well over $4 billion in exchange traded gold products, and we have 20 years of experience with people who want to trade their certificates for physical precious metals and get delivery. We do it every day.
Doug will hate me for this, but our gold is stored at the Royal Canadian Mint. We joke that our security is provided by NATO.
So I would suggest to you examine the architecture of the system, the reliability of the sponsors, and the redeemability and security of the gold behind gold-backed cryptos very carefully.
One of the things that’s given me personally great comfort is that of the three-dozen some odd entrants to the market that we’re aware of, we are the ones that have had the broadest adaption from the gold mining community.
If you look at our shareholders registered: Goldcorp, Wheaton Precious Metals, Iamgold, Agnico Eagle, we’ve done transactions already where Goldcorp transferred 3,000 ounces of gold to us in return for ledgers because it saved them hundreds of thousands of dollars in transaction fees already.
Nick Giambruno: A gold-backed crypto necessarily must have one foot in the real world and one foot in the digital world. If it has a foot in the real world it’s going to be susceptible to governments coercing them somehow, unfortunately.
There are plenty examples of crypto projects and precious metals initiatives thinking they could flout regulations, no matter how ridiculous they may be. What inevitably happens is they end up painting a big, red target on their backs. The government eventually shut them down.
How could a gold-backed crypto today avoid a similar fate?
Rick Rule: Well, when we began in conjunction with our partners developing our own product, we were very aggressive in communicating what we were doing and soliciting feedback from various regulators in both the United States and Canada.
While in an ideal world that wouldn’t be a requirement, that’s not the world that Sprott as a regulated entity inhabits. The consequence of that is that we didn’t surprise the regulatory authorities with anything, and we didn’t make any claims whatsoever that we were exempt from regulations that would become proposed.
With our product — because it isn’t a token, it’s really a deposit receipt or commodity receipt on the distributed ledger rather than a token — and because we were unsure of the way that the SEC would regulate the product, we decided to comply with know your customer regulations.
I won’t bore your readers with the arcane details, but it’s important that people understand that this distributed ledger receipt represents actual gold stored by us at the Royal Canadian Mint. It’s redeemable for gold and it’s exchangeable.
We have chosen internally to believe that gold-backed cryptos will ultimately attempt to be regulated by the CFTC or by the SEC or one of the banking regulators, and the consequence of that is that to participate in our offering you do need to open an account with a participating financial services firm.
The lesson that we’ve learned managing institutional money, managing ETFs, is that if you are going to play in investment markets and financial services markets, and think you’re going to circumvent regulation, you’re mistaken. That may or may not sit well with all your readers, but it’s the truth nonetheless.
Nick Giambruno: The value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can be wildly volatile. This is a problem for anyone looking to use cryptos in the regular course of business.
Gold-backed cryptos, on other hand, should have relatively stable prices. They also can give people the ability to send and receive gold as easy as sending email.
This should make them appealing to merchants, lenders, businesses, investors, escrow services and the like… anyone who wants to conduct business in gold — but also wants the convenience of cryptocurrencies.
Businesses could use gold-backed cryptos to pay rent, salaries, or other ordinary expenses. The possibilities are enormous. I think that could open a huge new ecosystem.
That’s why I think gold-backed cryptos could create a genuine revolution in finance and why I’m so excited about them in general.
The demand for gold-backed cryptos — which is really the demand for sound and convenient money — is potentially enormous. It can be useful to anyone.
Do you see this evolution in the gold-backed crypto space playing out?
Rick Rule: I absolutely do. If you look at the trading volume and liquidity that gold enjoys today and you add that to that the incredible economic efficiency of the distributed ledger, the ultimate applications that you’re talking about as a transfer mechanism, as a store of wealth, as collateral, an entirely new ecosystem, really are limitless.
Nick Giambruno: Doug and Rick, thank you for your time. If readers would like more information about Vaultchain they can send an email to TradeWind@sprottglobal.com.
The post Gold-Backed Cryptos: Doug Casey and Rick Rule Talk Potential of Digital Currencyappeared first on Sprott Media.
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like Gold-Backed Cryptos: Doug Casey and Rick Rule Talk Potential of Digital Currency on Facebook

Recent Articles:

Sprott U.S. Media, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprott Inc., which is a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and operates through its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries: Sprott Asset Management LP, an adviser registered with the Ontario Securities Commission; Sprott Private Wealth LP, an investment dealer and member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd., a US full service broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC; Sprott Asset Management USA Inc., an SEC Registered Investment Advisor; and Resource Capital Investment Corp., also an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. We refer to the above entities collectively as “Sprott”.
The information contained herein does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.
Forward-Looking Statement
This report contains forward-looking statements which reflect the current expectations of management regarding future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, and similar expressions have been used to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current beliefs with respect to future events and are based on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements could vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors should be considered carefully and undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this document are based upon what management currently believes to be reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation and Sprott does not assume any obligation to update or revise.
Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any fund or account managed by Sprott. Any reference to a particular company is for illustrative purposes only and should not to be considered as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell nor should it be considered as an indication of how the portfolio of any fund or account managed by Sprott will be invested.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author’s as of the date of this commentary, and are subject to change without notice. This information is for information purposes only and is not intended to be an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination by Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the objectives of the investor, financial situation, investment horizon, and their particular needs. This information is not intended to provide financial, tax, legal, accounting or other professional advice since such advice always requires consideration of individual circumstances. The products discussed herein are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested.
Generally, natural resources investments are more volatile on a daily basis and have higher headline risk than other sectors as they tend to be more sensitive to economic data, political and regulatory events as well as underlying commodity prices. Natural resource investments are influenced by the price of underlying commodities like oil, gas, metals, coal, etc.; several of which trade on various exchanges and have price fluctuations based on short-term dynamics partly driven by demand/supply and also by investment flows. Natural resource investments tend to react more sensitively to global events and economic data than other sectors, whether it is a natural disaster like an earthquake, political upheaval in the Middle East or release of employment data in the U.S. Low priced securities can be very risky and may result in the loss of part or all of your investment.  Because of significant volatility,  large dealer spreads and very limited market liquidity, typically you will  not be able to sell a low priced security immediately back to the dealer at the same price it sold the stock to you. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investing in foreign markets may entail greater risks than those normally associated with domestic markets, such as political, currency, economic and market risks. You should carefully consider whether trading in low priced and international securities is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Sprott Global, entities that it controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may hold positions in the securities it recommends to clients, and may sell the same at any time.
Copyright © 2019 Sprott US Media, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you requested information about the Sprott Group.
Our mailing address is:

Sprott US Media

1910 Palomar Point Way Ste 200

CarlsbadCA 92008-5578

Categories
Precious Metals

SPROTT Special Report: The Palladium Play – Part 1

January 2019

The Palladium Play – Part 1
By John Ciampaglia, CFA, CEO, Sprott Asset Management

Palladium is a key component for ICE autocatalysts. While the escalating U.S.-China trade war hurt many commodities in 2018, palladium continued to rise. Spot palladium gained 18.6% in 2018 and has soared 124% since the beginning of 2016….

“Russia, the world’s largest palladium producer, holds its official supply levels as a state secret. Many industry experts believe that Russia’s stockpiles have been largely sold. Supply concerns were further heightened in April 2018 when the U.S. levied more sanctions against Russia.

Read More

The White-Hot Metal Climbed 18% in 2018 and Doubled in Three Years
palladium-chart.jpg

Source: Bloomberg. XPT represents platinum; XAU represents gold; XPD represents palladium, XAG represents silver; SPXT represents the S&P 500 Total Return Index.

Financial Advisors and Individual Investors

Please contact the Sprott Team at 888.622.1813 for more information and answers to your questions or email us at invest@sprott.com.

Ed Coyne 
Executive Vice President, National Sales
646.599.0859
ecoyne@sprottusa.com 

Sergio Lujan 
Senior Investment Consultant
416.945.6223
slujan@sprott.com

Matthew Harrison 
Senior Investment Consultant
416.945.3313
mmharrison@sprott.com

To no longer receive electronic communications from us, please contact us at unsubscribe@sprott.com and indicate in the subject line your full name and/or corporate entity name.

This email and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email, delete this email and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Information and/or materials contained herein is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation for or an offer to buy any securities.

Sprott Inc.
Royal Bank Plaza, South Tower
200 Bay Street, Suite 2600
Toronto, Ontario  M5J 2J1, Canada
Telephone: 416.943.8099
Toll Free: 855.943.8099

Categories
Precious Metals

CHRIS MARCUS Is The Price of Silver About To Explode?

Original Source: https://www.milesfranklin.com/is-the-price-of-silver-about-to-explode/

So What’s The Big Deal About Silver

With the stock market reaching new all-time highs almost by the day, and precious metals in a vicious 7-year bear market, why would anybody want to invest in silver?
Fortunately, the exact conditions described above, as well as a unique set of events that most in the financial markets remain largely unaware of, have led to what could well be one of the most explosive (and profitable) events in financial market history.
Representing a potentially life-changing opportunity to those who recognize it before it’s too late.
Because similar to the way many wish they had bought Apple or Amazon stock years ago before their ascent in price, the case for a crypto-like move in the price of silver is not only compelling. But is also becoming more well known by the day, with perhaps the time to act quickly running out.

The Problem…                                      

The short version is that following the collapse of the subprime bubble in 2008, the Federal Reserve printed an astronomical amount of money. And while many are aware of the Fed’s low interest rate policy and quantitative easing programs, even many experienced investment advisors and traders don’t really comprehend the true extent of just how much money was printed. As well as the magnitude of the impact the withdrawal of that money will have on the financial markets.
As is detailed in this report, silver is uniquely positioned to be the prime beneficiary of these circumstances and others. And when this occurs, those who were positioned correctly in advance are likely to experience similar success to the investors who realized that the mortgage market was in a bubble prior to 2008.
And subsequently made a fortune by shorting the market.

But The Fed Has The Situation Under Control…Right?!

As you can see in the chart below, between the Fed’s Inception in 1913 and the collapse of the subprime bubble in 2008, the Fed increased the monetary base by approximately $875 billion (with the monetary base being one of the standard measures of the money supply – defined as the sum of currency in circulation and reserve balances held at the Fed).

(chart courtesy of the St. Louis Fed)
Following the quantitative easing programs, the monetary base exploded to over $4 trillion!!
So if the amount of money that was printed prior to the crisis is considered a lot (which it certainly is), then what was done after the crisis is simply stunning.
Of course despite all of the coverage about how the Fed has been “tightening” and “normalizing its balance sheet” in recent years, even a decade after the crisis the monetary base still sits at $3.5 trillion. While the Fed funds target rate remains at 2%.
So while there’s been a lot of talk about the Fed undoing the past decade of expansionary policy, keep in mind that relative to the amount of credit they added following the crisis, what’s been undone so far is just a drop in the bucket.
And what even fewer investors and traders are likely aware of is that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell even acknowledged before a Congressional testimony that the Fed has no intention of ever unwinding the majority of that credit.
Chairman Jeb Hensarling: With respect to normalization I think you had said publicly that you expect the new normal with respect to the size of the balance sheet to be roughly $2.5-3 trillion and get there over 3-4 years. Do I understand that correctly Mr. Chairman?
Fed Chairman Powell: Yes
I’ve personally found it rather interesting how I have yet to see anyone else in the financial community mention this. Which makes me wonder how the markets will react as more begin to truly grasp the impact of Powell’s confirmation of Hensarling’s statement.
In other words, a lot of the printed money and credit that was supposed to be temporary is now here to stay. And I’d be a little bit surprised if you’re able to find anyone else who’s actually aware of that.

So Where Did All Of That Money Go?

Over the past decade we’ve seen large amounts of printed money flow into the stock, bond, and real estate markets. With the major U.S. stock indices up more than 300% since March of 2009). While bond yields remain near historic lows, and real estate prices are generally in excess of pre-2007 levels in most areas of the country.
Yet silver, arguably one of the assets that would be most directly impacted by a dilution of the currency, sits basically unchanged during the same time when the money supply has exploded.
So why has this occurred?
And what does it mean going forward?
Keep reading, because I have a feeling you’re going to want to hear the answer.

But Aren’t Rising Interest Rates Bad For Precious Metals?

Before we get to why silver remains so undervalued despite the past decade of unprecedented global money printing (remember it’s not just in the U.S. where the central banks have been running the presses), there’s another issue that’s worth addressing first.
Specifically, that if lower interest rates and quantitative easing programs increase the money supply, which should lead to an increase in the price per ounce of silver as stated in dollars (remember the price of silver per ounce is a simple fraction, and if the supply of dollars are increased, then the $ price per ounce should theoretically increase as well), shouldn’t higher interest rates and the unwinding of QE have the opposite effect?
If that’s what you’ve been wondering, it’s an excellent question. Because the answer is one of the primary reasons why it’s worth your while to quickly become knowledgeable about what’s been going on in the silver market.

The Fed’s Unfortunate Dilemma….

Normally, if we were in the midst of a typical Federal Reserve tightening cycle where the money supply was being contracted, that would be bearish news for the price of precious metals.
Yet the times we live in are anything but typical, and given the context of what’s going on both financially and geo-politically, the Fed’s current dilemma has created a rather unique set of events that are unfolding as we speak.
Primarily because the past decade of central banking actions have inflated bubbles that are even bigger this time around. And seemingly less well equipped to handle higher interest rates than ever before.
Prior to the subprime crisis, the U.S. national debt stood at $9 trillion while the monetary base was $875 billion. Now the national debt is over $21 trillion while the monetary base is above $3.5 trillion.
Yet with interest rates on the 10-year U.S. treasury just barely cracking through the 3% level, we’re already seeing overwhelming evidence that the real estate market has started to slow down again. This is not a random coincidence.
So what’s going to happen to the mortgage market if the U.S. 10-year treasury yield reaches 4 or 5%? Is the stock market capable of withstanding higher interest rates? Keep in mind, that even 5% would still be well below anything that could be considered even relatively “normal”.
To put it in perspective, back in 2003, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan took the Fed’s target rate down to 1% for a year. When he tried to normalize rates the entire market collapsed. Now the Fed has almost a decade of 0% rates as well as the quantitative easing programs, and it’s difficult to see how the consequences this time around won’t be more severe.
Greenspan’s last rate hike prior to the crisis took the Fed’s target rate up to 5.25% in June of 2006. The current Fed has a bigger set of bubbles that are already starting to wobble and rates are only at 2%. So should the Fed continues raising rates until the bubbles pop, we aren’t looking at a typical tightening cycle where things carry on as normal.
If the money supply really did contract significantly (no, I don’t consider a $3.5 trillion balance sheet and 2% interest rates a decade later a significant tightening), it’s hard to see how the current system would remain intact.
Additionally, when the bubbles do begin to pop (with rising interest rates continuing to loom as one of the most likely pins), the Fed is incredibly likely to respond with a money printing campaign that will make the previous quantitative easingprograms pale in comparison.
Amazingly, there’s already an essay by a Fed official advocating a negative interest rate policy in the U.S.

How Do You Protect Your Wealth Against That?

The primary appeals of precious metals is as protection against systemic risk, market chaos, and currency devaluation.
All of which are amazingly already taking place in many of the emerging markets like Argentina, Turkey, Venezuela, and others. And while most on Wall Street think that something like that could never happen in the developed economies, when you actually look at the debt loads and balance sheets of the United States, Europe, and Japan, amazingly the numbers are even worse than those of the emerging market countries that are already in a crisis.
To put it in perspective, consider that Argentina, which is in the midst of a currency crisis, has a debt to GDP ratio of 39%.
Which is a drop in the bucket compared to the level of debt that’s been piled on in the United States. Where the current debt-to-gdp ratio is already well over 100%, and that’s without even factoring in the unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare. Which economist Laurence Kotlikoff estimates raises the true debt burden to over $200 trillion dollars! In an economy with a GDP of less than $20 trillion.
Yet meanwhile the price of insurance (in the form of gold and silver) remains in many cases below what it actually costs for a miner to dig it out of the ground.
Many on Wall Street might say that cooler heads will prevail in Washington and take responsible action before it’s too late. Yet even this late in the game, rather than hearing any discussion of cuts, the budget projections are already discussing when the debt load will hit $30 trillion.
Then add in that with interest rates rising, the cost of servicing the debt is going to rise as well. And with the U.S. treasury already running trillion dollar deficits, where is that money going to come from?
It’s a safe bet that one way or another, that debt is going to be monetized. Which is why the value of gold and silver is set to skyrocket.
So you can debate the “when” of the situation, but at this point, it’s no longer a matter of “if”.
Of course I like to hope that we will never see the day where the U.S. and other established economies approach anything near a state of hyperinflation.
Although hope aside, if policy makers were given the task of generating that outcome, the actions one would take to achieve that are essentially what’s being done right now. And one only needs to look through history to see how quickly everybody flocks to gold and silver in that type of environment.
So there is a day of reckoning coming in response to the last decade of monetary policy. And when that happens, again I would certainly want gold or silver versus dollars or treasuries.

It’s Past The Point Of No Return

When I first started researching the precious markets in 2009, this was one of the conclusions I quickly reached. That it’s past the point of no return. That whatever the Fed does is ultimately irrelevant from a long-term standpoint.
Yes, they can and have delayed the inevitable. Although should they stay on course with their tightening policy, it still leads to the same outcome. The current system has finally been pushed past the breaking point.
Which is why I always felt so comfortable owning gold and silver. Whatever the Fed does, it’s difficult to see an outcome that doesn’t result in a surge of demand for gold and silver.
Keep in mind that as rates go up and the bubbles pop, that also means a lot of investors are selling assets. While the markets will be in the exact environment where investors most flock to precious metals.

Gold and Silver Are Already Significantly Undervalued At Today’s Levels

It’s worth considering that even if the Fed really did contract the money supply and somehow the bubbles stayed intact, gold and silver would still have some catching up to do in price.
While there’s room to debate which money supply measurements and precious metals data to use, there is a simple method that puts into perspective just how much the metals have lagged behind the rest of the markets during this unprecedented era of monetary stimulus.
Back in August of 2008 gold was trading around $820 per ounce while silver was between $14-16. Again, as mentioned earlier, at that time the monetary base was $875 billion.
 
(silver chart courtesy of Kitco.com)
Now with the monetary base over $3.5 trillion (meaning it has quadrupled) gold sits around $1,200 per ounce, up about 50%. While silver is flat or even down depending on which day’s price you look at.
Meanwhile the stock markets are up by multiples, while most real estate markets are well in excess of their 2007 highs.
Additionally, add in that PhD Michigan State Economics Professor Mark Skidmore has uncovered that The Department of Defense and The Department of Housing and Urban Development have somehow “lost” $21 trillion. Which means you have to at least consider there’s a growing probability that there’s a lot more money out there than the Fed and government have told us about.

Meanwhile The World Is Noticing and Walking Away From The Dollar…

Many of the U.S. treasury’s foreign creditors have already begun to notice the fragility within U.S. financing and have started making arrangements to walk away from dollar infrastructure.
While in many cases also loading up on gold and silver.
Which is stunning. Because while many have been concerned about U.S. finances for decades, we’ve now begun to see foreign creditors not only make pointed public comments that were once unheard of, but are following up their statements with actions.
Earlier in 2018 China launched the PetroYuan contract in order to reduce the need to use dollars for oil transactions. China has also been developing trade agreements to circumvent the dollar with other nations that have been sanctioned by the U.S., such as Russia, Iran, and Turkey. And recently the Chinese even held a meeting with the leaders of several African nations to discuss using the Yuan as their reserve currency instead of the dollar.
And consider some of the comments being made by the leaders of these foreign nations, many of whom have long served as creditors to U.S. treasury borrowing.
Russian President Vladimir Putin:
“Now in regard to the notion that we should break away from the dollar.
I agree in general, this is not merely a separation from the dollar. This refers to the strengthening of our economic sovereignty.
And this is absolutely right.”
Keep in mind that Putin made these comments right before Russia unloaded the majority of their U.S. treasury holdingsover a period of 2 months.
Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan also offered similar sentiments in 2018.
“Why do we make all loans in dollars? Let’s use another currency. I suggest that the loans should be made based on gold.”
And it’s worth noting that Turkey has been one of the biggest gold buyers in recent years.
Yet perhaps most shocking of all is how recently even Germany’s Foreign Minister Heiko Maas talked about the need to reduce Europe’s dependence on dollar infrastructure.
“We must increase Europe’s autonomy and sovereignty in trade, economic and financial policies,” he said. “It will not be easy, but we have already begun to do it.”
“That’s why it is indispensable that we strengthen European autonomy by creating payment channels that are independent of the United States, a European Monetary Fund and an independent SWIFT system,” Maas wrote. “Every day the deal is alive is better than the highly explosive crisis that would otherwise threaten the Middle East.”
We’re no longer talking about a few small nations who don’t like U.S. policy.
Now it’s the world’s superpowers, and even one of the United States’ closest allies, who are publicly walking away from the dollar. And if these nations who were buying the U.S. debt are no longer doing so, or in cases like with Russia even becoming sellers, who’s going to buy all of the debt at the same time the U.S. deficits are growing faster than ever?

So Why Is The Price Of Silver Still So Low?

What many in the mainstream financial community are quickly realizing is that the majority of today’s markets have become highly manipulated. Perhaps more so than at any other time in history.
In recent years alone the banks have been caught manipulating the Libor Marketthe mortgage marketthe energy marketsthe stock marketthe foreign exchange markets, and the Federal Reserve openly manipulates the bond market while just calling it policy.
At this point it’s harder to find a market that isn’t manipulated than one that is.
Yet perhaps most importantly, the banks have most certainly been manipulating the price of gold and silver lower, and have actually even already been caught doing so.

Deutsche Bank Trader Transcripts Remove All Shadow of a Doubt

In 2016 Deutsche Bank reached a settlement with regulators where they agreed to pay a fine of $100 million, while also agreeing to further cooperate in the case. Suggesting that part of their agreement was that they would provide information about the other banks that have been involved. And sure enough, in 2018 the U.S. authorities fined and charged UBS and HSBC as well.
So not only are there court cases and documents confirming that the price has been manipulated, but one of the results of the case is that many of the Deutsche Bank trader transcripts were released. And not only do they confirm highly illegal and collusive behavior, but they even depict traders boasting about how easily they were able to manipulate the market
 

So It’s Manipulated….But What Does That Actually Mean?

When you dig further into the silver market and explore the mechanics of the manipulation, the short version is that prices are kept lower by selling massive amounts of paper silver contracts that cannot actually be delivered.
For those interested in some of the more technical aspects of the manipulation, Craig Hemke of TF Metals has assembled an incredible “Econ 101 — Silver Market Manipulation” that walks through the details.
But the nutshell version is that there’s far more paper silver than there is actual physical metal in existence. And at some point when someone shows up for their metal and the other side can’t deliver, the conditions are in place for the short-squeeze of a lifetime.
Well respected analyst Bill Holter (amongst others) reports that at this point there may be as many as 500 paper claims for each physical ounce of metal. And there are regular reports of large amounts of paper gold and silver being dumped and driving the price down.
This has happened on a repeated basis over the past decade in particular. Where on frequent occasions large sell offers hammer all of the bids in the middle of the night in the U.S. when the markets are not open and liquidity is thin.
As a former equity-options trader and NYSE specialist, I would have been thrown out of my firm if I ever executed an order like that. Because that’s simply not what you would do if you were trying to obtain the best price.
Many others in the precious metals community have also commented on how the execution of some of these trades was rather suspicious. And it was one of the red flags that caught my eye and led me to investigate further.

The Silver Manipulation Is Starting To Become Not So Secret Anymore….

As the manipulation has continued on over the years, more and more market voices have been speaking out about what’s actually going on.
So while the purpose of this report is not to overly focus on the manipulation elements, given how it is the biggest factor currently driving the price, I will share at least some of the developments that have occurred, which explain why the price of silver has gotten so far out of line.

Whistle blower Andrew Maguire Describes A Manipulation To CFTC – BEFORE IT OCCURS

There’s a London metals trader and whistle-blower named Andrew Maguire who years ago contacted the CFTC (the regulatory agency tasked with maintaining integrity in the silver market) about the manipulation that he had been witnessing.
He even walked one of the CFTC regulators through a manipulation, and told him what would happen, before it occurred. Sure enough the situation played out exactly as Maguire predicted.
Maguire has continued to speak out about the illegal behavior he’s witnessed, and if this is your first time hearing about the manipulation of the silver market, I highly recommend watching this video beginning at the 10:28 mark. Where Maguire walks through exactly how the scheme works.
Interestingly, in one of his articles Maguire also commented on some of the government and central bank activity in the gold market, that others including GATA have also reported on extensively.
Shortly after the Bank of England bailed out Goldman Sachs in 1999, Eddie George, governor of the Bank of England, facing a Goldman Sachs bankruptcy admitted the following, these are his exact words.
“We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore, at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded. The US Fed was very active in getting the gold price down. So was the U.K.”
While it is beyond the scope of this report to cover the entire history of the precious metals manipulation, hopefully some of these excerpts (as well as the links provided) begin to illustrate that there has indeed been manipulation that has affected the price. And just like in any market where the price is artificially distorted, eventually it has to snap back. Which is what all the evidence indicates is close to finally occurring in the silver market.

Silver Expert Ted Butler Warns CFTC About Extreme Short Positions

One of the more well known figures in the silver community is analyst Ted Butler. Who for years has dissected the Commitment of Traders report published each week by the CFTC.
The commitment of traders report details what the banks and hedge funds have done, and provides insight into the mechanics of the market.
What Ted has uncovered over the past decade is beyond stunning, and copied below is a letter he wrote to the CFTC commissioners and shared online.
“I’m writing concerning a matter that the Commission has considered on a number of past occasions – allegations of a silver price manipulation on the Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX). The reason the Commission has considered the issue of a silver price manipulation several times in the past is because the agency’s own public data and guidelines point strongly to such a manipulation. Never have the data been more convincing than what was just published Friday, in the Commission’s release of its weekly Commitments of Traders (COT) Report, for positions held as of April 4, 2017.
That report indicates that the concentrated net short position held by the four largest traders in COMEX silver futures hit an all-time extreme in numbers of contracts of 78,021, the equivalent of 390 million oz. of silver. The concentrated net short position of the eight largest traders was indicated at 104,978 contracts or the equivalent of nearly 525 million oz., or more than 60% of world annual mine production. No other commodity comes close to COMEX silver futures in terms of a larger concentrated short position when compared to real world production. On its face, the large concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures would appear to be an artificial price depressant.
But not only do COMEX silver futures stand out as having the largest concentrated short position of any commodity, in terms relative to real world production, consumption and existing inventories, the concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures is notable for other reasons.
For one reason, the big short traders do not appear to be engaged in any sort of legitimate hedging, since there are no signs they represent actual producers or hedgers of physical holdings.
Publicly-owned mining companies are required to disclose any hedge activity and few, if any have disclosed any hedging in silver. The big short sellers in COMEX silver futures are financial firms, mostly banks, speculating against other big speculators and have no legitimate economic or hedging purpose in dealing in COMEX silver in the first place.
The largest COMEX silver short seller for the past nine years is JP Morgan. That has been the case ever since it acquired the failing investment bank Bear Stearns, the former largest COMEX silver short seller, according to Commission data and its correspondence with lawmakers. The special manipulative twist here is that since 2011, JPMorgan has engaged in an epic accumulation of physical silver at prices much lower than would have existed if the bank had not also been the largest silver short seller on the COMEX. In the recently completed COMEX March silver futures delivery period, JPMorgan stopped (accepted) 2689 contracts in its own proprietary trading account, plus another 739 contracts on behalf of a client(s), considerably more than the 1500 contracts allowed according to exchange regulations. This while JPMorgan was the largest short holder in COMEX silver futures. It is not possible to imagine a more compelling motive or intent for manipulation than to acquire a massive amount of any commodity at depressed prices, where the acquirer is responsible for the depressed prices.
Almost without fail, on every past occasion where the concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures reached extreme levels, it was only a matter of time before the price of silver gets rigged lower by these big shorts to induce speculative selling from traders operating on technical price signals. In fact, COT report data indicate that JPMorgan has never taken a loss, only profits on every silver short position it has added over the past nine years. Such results would not be possible in a market that wasn’t manipulated in price. In essence, speculators have taken over the price discovery process in silver because there are so few real hedgers trading on the COMEX, only speculating banks betting against other speculative traders. 
I have communicated all this to the Commission, JPMorgan and the CME Group (owner-operator of the COMEX) for many years, with hardly any acknowledgement or rebuttal. I am hoping you will consider this matter differently and act to finally end the manipulation. I’m sure how you handle this matter will define your tenure. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on me.
Sincerely yours,
Ted Butler

Even Bloomberg Reports On Suspicious Trading In The Precious Metals Markets

For a long time the mainstream media has been reluctant to share what has become common knowledge in the precious metals community.
Yet recently even Bloomberg and others have begun commenting on the suspicious trading activity. As it becomes harder and harder to otherwise explain the routinely counter-intuitive price action.
“We didn’t see any headlines, any news to make gold drop $10, but it just did,” Miguel Perez-Santalla, a sales and marketing manager at Heraeus Metals New York LLC, said by telephone. “It’s going with someone who has a huge position that can trigger stops and make the market move in a direction.”
And the following is another quote from Bloomberg’s coverage of the Deutsche Bank case.
The Deutsche Bank documents show two UBS traders communicated directly with two Deutsche Bank traders and discussed ways to rig the market, the plaintiffs said. Among other things, the traders shared customer order-flow information, improperly triggered customer stop-loss orders, and engaged in practices such as spoofing. Spoofing entails submitting bids or offers with the intention of canceling them before they’re executed as a way to drive prices.
CFTC Regulator Bart Chilton Confirms “Nefarious” Activity and Violations of Silver Law
Former CFTC commissioner Bart Chilton, who was a part of the agency during one of their investigations into the silver market has on many occasions publicly stated that after reviewing the evidence, he believes the market is indeed being manipulated.
“Based upon the information I received from the public, certainly there were nefarious actions and I believe violations of the law. When people send you emails  and say the price of silver is going to be smashed one day, and then the next day it actually happens. And when that happens repeatedly or maybe 6 out of 8 or 9 times, that leads you to question what’s going on.”

I did actually email the CFTC commissioners back in 2012 to alert them of what I had found in my own research, and interestingly, Chilton responded (he was the only one).
In his reply he mentioned that he was doing everything that he could, but that it took 3 out of 5 votes (with there being 5 commissioners who each get a vote) to pass any regulation. Essentially acknowledging that he believed the market was manipulated, yet was unable to get his agency to do anything about it.
Now why the CFTC continues to overlook a mountain of evidence without acting or responding remains an open question. But keep in mind that a similar regulatory agency, the SEC, had been receiving warnings about Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme from an analyst named Harry Markopolos for years before it imploded. Yet as Markopolos details in his book “No One Would Listen”, whether for political reasons or otherwise, the agency just did nothing.
Years later, those who had not been informed lost big.
A similar dynamic now exists with silver and the CFTC, and whether the regulators ever act or not, either way the short paper imbalance is eventually going to be resolved.

Analysts and Experts Warn About Looming Shortage of Silver

Below are a few additional resources and experts that can provide further evidence and detail into the manipulation of the precious metals markets. As well as how these dynamics have created a setup in which precious metal prices are simply going to have to rise substantially at some point.

“Today we have over 300 times margin on silver. Silver trades on a global scale about a billion ounces a day and virtually all of that is paper, or 90% plus is paper. 
The miners produce 800 million ounces a year, so we’re trading, just using simple math, 365 billion ounces a year on the exchanges worldwide, and we’re only producing 800 million ounces per year. 
That’s a quite lot of leverage in my view. So if you get away from the exchanges, that leverage disappears, and you have a much more fair pricing mechanism.
That whole system that’s currently pricing our metals is going to end.”

  • Mike Maloney, founder of com talks about the market manipulation, and how the Office of the Treasury of South Carolina did a formal investigation and concluded that the banks have been illegally suppressing the price.

  • Silver analyst Bix Weir notes how after holding a massive short silver position for years, the banks have managed to unwind it. Now leaving the hedge funds with the naked short position. Perhaps one of the best indicators yet that the expected spike upwards may be close at hand.
  • Lastly, it’s worth pointing out that a very similar scheme in the gold market has already been attempted, and was known as the London Gold Pool. The collapse of the gold pool occured in very similar fashion to what’s happening now, and eventually resulted in Richard Nixon removing the U.S. from the gold standard.

It’s an incredibly informative parallel, and provides at least one possible template for how things will play out this time around. 

Supply and Demand Indicate Silver Is Set To Soar

Oddly enough, for those who closely follow the silver market, much of the supply and demand data has almost become an afterthought in recent years. Primarily because the supply and demand has had virtually no impact on price. As the market pricing has been dominated by the unbacked paper short position.
Yet there are still interesting data points to consider.
For example, while coming up with exact silver supply and demand figures is more of an art than science, The Silver Institute’s data shows a consistent yearly deficit after accounting for investment demand.
One of the reasons why many expect this deficit to continue or even increase is due to how the majority of silver is consumed in industrial applications. And with demand for solar and “Green” products growing, all of which require silver, there are many who believe the metal will be even more in demand going forward.
Neumeyer mentions how “if we expect to go green and do everything that we expect to do as a human race, we’re going to need a ton more silver.”
Legendary investor Rick Rule of Sprott Global, one of the most well-respected figures in the commodities sector also sees increasing demand for silver.
“We are seeing increasing industrial utilization of silver, which will continue when the silver price stays low. There is enormous utility in silver, and new uses for it are being evolved currently, partially as a function of the fact that it’s very cheap relative to its utility in industrial applications.
So from an industrial application standpoint the market is extremely strong.”
Also worth noting is how silver is currently trading slightly above $14 per ounce, which for many miners is below the cost of production. Which has led to a fall in production. A condition that would only be further exacerbated if the price does not rise.
Which means that there’s a natural floor to which silver cannot fall below without further reducing supply. And the price is already below that floor!
Neumeyer mentions how,
“If you go back to 2015, the mining industry as a whole worldwide produced 850 million ounces of silver. In 2016 that number was 800 million ounces. A reduction of 50 million ounces. We know in 2017 that Chile is down 10%, and Canada and Mexico are also down.
If we add it all up the speculation is that the mining industry as a whole is something in the order of 750 million ounces in 2017. So we’re seeing declining world production of silver and increasing demand for the metal. This is a perfect storm.
The market hasn’t picked up on this yet, but this is a serious issue.

So while these supply and demand fundamentals have failed to move the price in recent years, they support a significantly higher silver price whenever the paper manipulation is finally overwhelmed.
Why Silver Over Gold?

In this report I’ve referenced both gold and silver on several occasions, as they are closely interrelated and both share the qualities of being monetary metals. As such, I do expect gold to rise in price substantially in the coming years as well.
Yet with that said, there are just some dynamics that favor silver rising even substantially more than gold. As already mentioned, there is somewhat of a consensus in the industry that at this point, due to the industrial consumption of the majority of silver that’s been mined, that there’s actually more above ground gold than silver.
Precious metals analyst Rob Kirby points out how:
Virtually every ounce of gold ever mined is in existence in stocks on the face of the earth. And silver being a dual use metal, being monetary and industrial, silver tends to get consumed, and the reality is there is much less in terms of stock of silver available above ground than there is gold by a factor of about eight.
There’s is widely admitted to be roughly around a billion ounces of silver in existence in above ground stocks. Which is about the amount of silver that’s mined out of the earth’s crust in 1 year. Whereas there’s probably 7-8 billion ounces of gold in identifiable or alleged above ground stocks.
So silver in reality is more rare above ground on the planet than gold.
Estimates of the ratio of the amount of gold vs. silver in the earth’s crust range anywhere from around 1:8 to 1:17. Meaning that there is 8 to 17 times more silver than gold in the earth’s crust.
Yet at today’s pricing the ratio stands at 85:1. Meaning that if this ratio corrects to account for the actual supply both above and below ground of each metal, silver has a lot of catching up to do.
“The amount of above ground silver is substantially less than gold. In 1950, there were approximately ten billion ounces of silver available above ground compared to approximately one billion ounces of gold. In 1980, there were approximately 3.5 billion ounces of available silver above ground.  

In 2011, not one government owned any significant amount of silver, yet there were approximately 5.8 billion ounces of gold available. In 2014, the amount of gold available above ground had increased further, to approximately 6.2 billion ounces according to Thomson Reuters. At the same time, the world was unable to produce silver in sufficient quantities to meet the worldwide demand.”
How Does Nobody Else Know About This?!

For a long time, that’s what I wondered myself.
Because as soon as I got a handle on the fundamentals of the situation, it was shocking to me how during my 11 years on Wall Street I never came across anyone else who had ever even thought to consider looking into the silver market.
It’s not a very public market. And the mainstream financial media rarely (at least until recently) mentions anything about the bizarre and counter-intuitive price action that so many in the silver community have grown accustomed to.
Yet evidence continues to emerge that even mainstream investors are increasingly awakening to the merits of the investment case for precious metals.
Several countries have repatriated their gold this year, while even mainstream investors like Ray Dalio and Jeffrey Gundlach have started investing in gold. All while countries like China and Russia continue to add to their gold holdings. And given the relationship and similarities between gold and silver, it seems like only a matter of time before some of these investment flows start getting reallocated into the silver market.
Keep in mind that the silver investment market is also relatively small (with most estimates claiming that the entire market of investment grade silver is only about $15-25 billion). Which means that when even a small amount of capital enters the silver market, the price is going to move quickly. Similar to what was witnessed in 2011 when silver hit $49 in the span of a few months.
Also remember that most market participants are largely unaware of everything you’ve just read. Although that’s rapidly changing, and as more and more realize what’s actually been going on, it’s only a matter of time before someone forces the issue.

How Much Is Silver Actually Worth?

In terms of valuing silver, there’s not necessarily one “correct” approach. Especially with a lot of ambiguity around how much metal actually exists, how many dollars are actually out there, and how much demand there will be for silver going forward. And all of it gets incredibly skewed by the manipulation of the pricing.
Fortunately, I have yet to come across a valuation that makes sense that doesn’t have silver multiples higher than the $14 level where it trades today. And given how silver hit $49 in 2011, and now there are court documented records showing that the reason it got hammered was because of illegal trading, I’ve personally always internally seen that level as somewhat of a floor. With the possibility that a true fair value is far in excess of that.
Yet one simple method of thinking about what a realistic price might be is to start by calculating a range of estimates for gold. Which is a little easier to do. And then back out a silver price from that.
Noted economic analyst and author Jim Rickards has spoken often about how he calculates that to back the paper currencies with gold, the price would have to be around $9,000 to $10,000 per ounce. And while there is a lot of validity to his argument and approach (which I do recommend taking a look at), a case could be made that his estimate is actually somewhat conservative.
Now full warning, I’m not suggesting that the price of gold is going to $10,000 per ounce this year or in the near future (although at the same time it is very possible). But what is truly fascinating is how an objective approach to determine how much gold is really worth does provide some interesting observations.
According to Rickards:
“If you back 40% of the $24 trillion of money supply with the amount of official gold, it implies a gold price around $9,000 an ounce. But I predict $10,000.
So how do I arrive at $10,000 an ounce?
That’s because I expect central banks to print a lot more money by the time this issue comes to a head. So, by the time the printing presses stop running around the world, that $9,000 number will likely be in the range of $10,000.”

A few notes here. First, it’s only appropriate to point out that in his initial calculation he is referring to the world’s money supply, and not just the dollar. So if one were to just use the supply of dollars, that number would be considerably lower.
Theoretically.
Because as already mentioned, the $21 trillion of undocumented adjustments and losses between the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development raises the following question. If $21 trillion has gone missing, how much money is really out there? And can we really trust the Federal Reserve numbers at this point?
Also, Rickards uses the assumption of a 40% backing, rather than a 100% backing. Which would result in a much higher number. Now whether there would be a 40% backing or a 100% backing, or whether it will ultimately be the government that still has the ability to set the price gets a bit into the hypothetical realm.
But what I do agree with Rickards about is that there is more money printing on the way. And the reason this is important is that whatever answer you get based on whichever calculations and assumptions you choose to use will change if the money supply is then further increased. And given the corner the Fed has backed itself into, one way or another, the price of gold is going to be a great deal higher than it is now.
Keep in mind that if you used any of the figures in that chart and then backed out a silver price even using the current 85:1 ratio, you’re looking at a massively higher price of silver. Of course if that ratio narrows, the valutions for silver just rise even more.

Solutions

So what’s the solution when the conditions for the short squeeze of a lifetime have fallen into place?
There are a variety of different silver products available in the market. Some of which are very good and reliable, and some that are not so much. Keep in mind that anytime you invest in paper forms of silver, you are trusting a counterparty as opposed to knowing that you own and possess your own physical metal.
Based on my own career, experience, and research, I’m extremely wary of some of the bank paper metal products. Primarily because that’s what has created so much leverage in the market and facilitated the manipulation. A lot of people own paper silver, and I’m concerned that when the price finally skyrockets, they are going to find out that there is no physical metal behind the paper they were sold.
So whenever people who are new to metals ask me about where to start, I always recommend beginning with buying physical bullion first. With the primary benefit being that you know that you have physical metal, and not a paper promise. And you can also store it safely on your own terms without needing to count on or trust a third party.
Miles Franklin specializes in providing physical metal to our clients, and for most investors, this is the place to start.
With that said, for those who are looking for alternative options, Miles Franklin did recently create VaultChain Gold and Silver. Which are blockchain gold and silver backed products, that represent ounces of metal that you are able to redeem and have delivered at any time.
Now given everything I’ve just said about paper gold and silver products, I can understand if you wonder why this would be any different. And it’s a good question to ask.
Fortunately the products were developed as a specific response to the concerns many in the industry had about the integrity of some of the paper options out there. So in combination with  SprottGlobal and the Royal Canadian Mint, VaultChain was created to utilize the transparency of the blockchain to verify that each ounce that’s sold is actually backed by the physical metal on a 1:1 basis.
So while starting with physical bullion is usually the more appropriate choice for most investors, the VaultChain gold and silver products are CUSIP registered. Which allows investment funds whose bylaws might not allow them to purchase physical metal to still own gold and silver that is audited and confirmed to be in place. And available for delivery at any time of your choosing.
At Miles Franklin we specialize in filling our clients’ needs for a wide range of precious metal coins and bars, and are happy to facilitate both retail and institutional orders.
I encourage you to call me directly at 720-363-3791 with any questions about gold and silver, the contents of this report, or anything else that’s going on in the market (you can also email me at cmarcus@milesfranklin.com. And if you are ready to invest or purchase silver or any other precious metals, I’m happy to help you find what you need.

In Closing

Certainly these are fascinating time we live in.
I often still think back to when I was beginning my trading career, and how I never could have imagined that this is where my research would take me. In fact to this day, I continue to be stunned that so many unique circumstances could lead to a market being this far out of line.
So by all means, I encourage you to further research and verify anything I’ve presented in this report. Although I’m confident that if you do, you’ll likely come away as excited about what’s about to happen in the silver market as I am.
Again if you have any questions or would like to place an order, I’m happy to help and can be reached at 720-363-3791 or cmarcus@milesfranklin.com.
I do appreciate you taking the time to read this, and hope you found it as valuable as it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Chris Marcus
Miles Franklin
www.MilesFranklin.com
720-363-3791
cmarcus@milesfranklin.com

Categories
Precious Metals

MILES FRANKLIN Happy New Year!

From The Desk Of David Schectman
Happy New Year to all our friends and clients.
“In life what you treasure
Joy and pleasure
It depends on how you measure
Everybody want to live it up year”
David’s Commentary:
The older I get the faster the year’s fly by. I’m writing this early Monday morning, so the markets can change a bit before they shut down for New Years, but the year finished up as well as I could have hoped for. Miles Franklin sold more gold and silver this year than we did in 2017 and that is an accomplishment.
Gold hit a six-month peak this morning, reaching the highest price since June 15 at $1,284.09, but the price is still down 1.5%, or around $20 from this date last year. Still, in the last ten weeks gold rose from $1,180 to $1,285.  That’s a nice finish to 2018.
For the year silver performed much worse, down 8.7% or $1.47, but it is off its mid November low of $13.98 and today’s price of $15.44 is now at a four month high, just coming off its best weekly gain in more than a year. Silver is the most undervalued of all the precious metals.
I was hoping to see $1,300 gold and $15 silver by year’s end. Silver did not disappoint. Gold is close. Silver seems to be pulling ahead of gold ever since the lawsuit against the JPMorgan silver trader happened last month. JPMorgan is no longer short silver. That being the case, silver should continue to outperform gold. The silver to gold ratio is moving down now, from a high of 86 to 1 to the current 83.41 to 1. I expect the downward trend of this ratio to continue in 2019.
Our friends over at BFI in Switzerland, whom we partnered with in the 90s, are bullish on gold and silver. They write, “Precious metals too, look finally like they are building some renewed momentum as they are benefitting from increased uncertainty and higher volatility. We think investors should now also consider investment in precious metals again.” It’s always fun to get the Swiss view of our gold and silver markets.
Managed Money Traders Sold More Gold And Silver Contracts At Times Than They Ever Sold In History. – Ted Butler
The reason that gold and silver had rough sledding in 2018 can be explained by the big managed money selling on the COMEX. In gold, from the high of $1,360 last January to the low of $1,170 in August, managed money traders sold over 300,000 net COMEX gold contracts, (around 30 million ounces). In Silver they sold more than 80,000 net contracts (400 million ounces) TWICE crunching the price from $17.50 to $14 before silver rallied.
What makes me optimistic about silver in 2019 is that JPMorgan is essentially no longer short in silver, having eliminated 100,000 contracts along the way. We have suggested this may well be the result of the Justice Department investigation leading to a criminal guilty plea from a former JPMorgan trader for manipulating COMEX gold and silver futures. They are no doubt concerned that he may be willing to pass the blame up the chain. How important is this event? Ted Butler says, “No market crime is more important than manipulation and you can rest assured this matter is occupying the very highest levels of JPMorgan and the Justice Department.” If JPMorgan truly has relinquished its role of backstopping the commercials as the short seller of last resort silver could take off like a rocket.
For the first time in the last two years, silver is now flirting with its 200-day moving average. It could breach it today, the last day of 2018. That should add some buying interest from the hedge funds.
The whole 2009 to 2018 was essentially a fraud created by the Fed, by doing things that no one in the history of the financial world had ever heard about before: printing money and having zero or negative interest rates. Well here we are. Now we’re doing the opposite. Are we surprised that stocks are going down? Well, we shouldn’t be.” – Craig Hemke
I recently read an article on the Internet that said you should get rid of all of your cash because pretty soon no one will accept it. That is nonsense. There will always be people who will accept US dollars and you can always deposit them in your bank if it comes to that. And in the event of a cyber attack that shuts down computers, you better have cash if you want to buy food, water and gasoline. How much cash you keep on hand is up to you, but a few thousand dollars minimum is a great insurance policy with no downside. Keep some cash, preferably in $5s and $10s and at least one bag of junk silver dimes as your “just in case” core position. You can go heavier on the junk since it is the cheapest way to own silver and the way it looks to me, this is THE time to load up on silver.
A friend of mine, who has been in the business for a long time, just came into some extra money. He purchased $1,000,000 worth of silver on Friday. He split it between silver mining shares, which are very cheap now and more physical silver too. I think he made a smart move. The longest bull market in history is over as the S&P suffered its worst Christmas Eve trading day on record. Yup, December turned out to be a very turbulent month for stocks.
Precious metals were up, down and back up again and the dollar wants to break down, especially with the Fed stepping back and holding steady with interest rates. I would hate to be a trader in this market. The year will end with the dollar trending down, stocks still very overpriced and risky and gold and silver starting to make a move.
Gold appears to be breaking out to new highs, despite the strength of the dollar and the equity markets. The negativity and fear surrounding gold is helping propel prices higher and it now looks headed to the next level of $1,300.
Silver has suddenly gained strength as well breaking out as it targets $16. After months of consolidation, silver is attracting new money buyers and looks ready to join gold in what looks like the next bull market in metals.
Although both gold and silver look good and appear to be headed to new highs, that doesn’t alleviate the potential for a reversal and some selling pressure. Traders and investors must still watch the support levels. Gold’s support is $1,250 and silver support is $15. As with any trade, the key to success is patience and discipline. – Todd ‘Bubba’ Horwitz
Habits are hard to change and folks in their mid 30’s & younger are still hooked on a stock market where they’ve never seen a real BEAR! When the coffee hits the nervous system metals & miners will fly. And the physicals right along with them.
If asked what my predictions are for 2019 I would have to say, “I really don’t know.” I think things are lined up to fuel a solid rise in gold and silver. I think the dollar will be much lower a year from now and the stock market as well. But there are no free markets and as long as a JPMorgan and PPT lurk in the shadows, it is impossible to know. Given all of that, I am an optimist, at least when it comes to gold and silver. I expect to add to my positions again this year. Unlike the stock market, which threw off consistent gains for the past eight years, when it comes to gold and silver, you make it all at once. When the bull market clicks in, the gains will be huge and worth the wait.
Zero Hedge published an article today by Doug Cass titled, “Don’t Blame Powell For The Mess He’s Left To Clean Up.” He said, “Powell should continue doing the right thing, but slowly and carefully. A garden-variety recession is fine. A move down in equities is fine. Those things are normal and part of a functioning capitalistic economy. It is amazing and unhealthy that market participants seem to forget this cleansing role.”
He praised Fed Chairman Powell for his dovish stance and blamed previous Fed Heads Greenspan, Bernanke and Yellen for the mess that Powell finds himself in now. The Fed, the article stated, must take a longer-term view and it is not their job to keep worry about a pullback in the stock market. That is a valid viewpoint.
A friend of mine, who owns a bank, and is very pro-Trump, had a different take on this, one worth considering. Here are his well thought out comments.
Regarding Powell … he has failed. If Powell’s job as Fed Chair is to foster a healthy, powerful economy and mitigate economic collapse, then he has failed. He should understand that erratic gyrations are not healthy for our economy, or our national security, or our economic (or negotiating) power in the World, or for our middle-class workers, or for our small businesses. These dramatic market gyrations only help scoundrels like George Soros or other who feed on market uncertainty and high volatility. Not surprisingly, such economic gyrations do not impact the Washington elite class who are burrowed in somewhere in the government and collecting their share of “the government dole”. Nope, Powell’s friends in the elite circles of Washington are insulated from his actions.
The results of Powell’s stubbornness, and his dislike of Trump, are fully evident in the economic results of his heralded September and December rate hikes. He did not need to advocate for rate hikes at both junctures, but he did, primarily because Fed Chair Powell was blinded by his dislike for Trump. If it would have been Obama in office or Clinton (God forbid, and God did), it is absolutely curtain that Powell, under the same facts and circumstances, would not have advocated for raising rates in both instances, as he did. Let’s not be naïve, Powell is clearly part of the Washington elite “swamp” that Trump is trying to drain. If Powell can crash the economy and have the media put the blame on Trump, he has succeeded, and he can then hang out at Holiday parties with all of his Washington elite friends and say he got Trump. I am sure he was a hero and the life of those parties.
So, Powell’s “intelligent and sophisticated” plan to raise rates in both September and December has resulted in what? Just what we are seeing … a failed plan, a damaged market and economy in the U.S., resultant damage and problems around the World, a bad environment to negotiate deals, a precipitous drop in consumer confidence (oops, I forgot he doesn’t care about those people -they are not part of his elite group of friends), etc. Now, my 13-year old grandson, Macallan, would likely have raised rates in either September or December, but not at both dates. And some air would have been let out of the economic bubble, but it would not have created the current Bear market or precipitous drop in consumer confidence. Then, Macallan would have carefully considered the next rate hike with the above consequences of erratic economic behavior in mind … and methodically let the air out of the current economic bubble.
As for Powell, from this point forward expect that he will be steering left-then-right-then-left-then-right for the balance of Trump’s tenure in office, and then in about two years he will settle back down to normalized accommodative policy for the next democrat/socialist president, under whose administration, Powell’s elite swamp buddies will again be safe. And, he will burrowed into some safe government position or pension again.
If you are interested in your precious metal portfolio’s performance, what Powel and the Fed do, going forward, is very important to you. Jim Rickards makes it very clear: “Gold is “defying headwinds right now but watch what happens when headwinds turn into tailwinds.”
Ed Steer
The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets garnered even more attention yesterday. In the Friday edition of the King Report, Bill King had this to say…
“Blatant ESH manipulation occurred during the final ninety minutes of trading on Thursday. It marks the second consecutive day of palpable stock market manipulation. The only question is: Who is doing the ESH and stock manipulation? Where are the Wall Street advocates for ‘freely traded markets’?”
“Today [Friday] – The U.S. stock market has been under blatant and extreme manipulation since Christmas. While many will cheer the artificial rally, the action is detrimental to U.S. capital markets in the longer run. The upward manipulation could be setting up stocks for a decline that is worse than what transpired from early October to Christmas — and vicious swings can demoralize the investing public.”
“There is no way to reliable gauge the probabilities of stock movements in the short term now, because stocks are beholden to manipulation.”
As Chris Powell stated back in April of 2008…”There are no markets anymore…only interventions”…which was the headline to my Friday missive.
Of course this manipulation has been going on in form or another in the stock markets since the crash of 1987 — and in the aftermath of that, President Ronald Reagan gave birth to the PPT that Bill King alludes to. And in the precious metals…gold and silver in particular…for at least a couple of generations — and I’m talking forty-five years.
Back in April of 2001, British economist Peter Warburton spelled it out chapter and verse in his landmark essay “The debasement of world currency: It’s inflation but not as we know it“…when he said this…
“What we see at present is a battle between the central banks and the collapse of the financial system fought on two fronts. On one front, the central banks preside over the creation of additional liquidity for the financial system in order to hold back the tide of debt defaults that would otherwise occur. On the other, they incite investment banks and other willing parties to bet against a rise in the prices of gold, oil, base metals, soft commodities or anything else that might be deemed an indicator of inherent value. Their objective is to deprive the independent observer of any reliable benchmark against which to measure the eroding value, not only of the US dollar, but of all fiat currencies. Equally, they seek to deny the investor the opportunity to hedge against the fragility of the financial system by switching into a freely traded market for non-financial assets.
It is important to recognize that the central banks have found the battle on the second front much easier to fight than the first. Last November I estimated the size of the gross stock of global debt instruments at $90 trillion for mid-2000. How much capital would it take to control the combined gold, oil, and commodity markets? Probably, no more than $200 billion, using derivatives.
Moreover, it is not necessary for the central banks to fight the battle themselves, although central bank gold sales and gold leasing have certainly contributed to the cause. Most of the world’s large investment banks have over-traded their capital [bases] so flagrantly that if the central banks were to lose the fight on the first front, then the stock of the investment banks would be worthless. Because their fate is intertwined with that of the central banks, investment banks are willing participants in the battle against rising gold, oil, and commodity prices.
Central banks, and particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve, are deploying their heavy artillery in the battle against a systemic collapse. This has been their primary concern for at least seven years…[that’s 1994 – Ed]. Their immediate objectives are to prevent the private sector bond market from closing its doors to new or refinancing borrowers and to forestall a technical break in the Dow Jones Industrials. Keeping the bond markets open is absolutely vital at a time when corporate profitability is on the ropes. Keeping the equity index on an even keel is essential to protect the wealth of the household sector and to maintain the expectation of future gains. For as long as these objectives can be achieved, the value of the U.S. dollar can also be stabilized in relation to other currencies, despite the extraordinary imbalances in external trade.”
That essay is almost 18-years old — and is even more true now than it was back then. It is so obvious beyond any shadow of a doubt that all things paper want to burn…including the currencies — and things physical would soar in price, if it were not for the 24/7 interventions by the powers-that-be. That’s why the PPT has been at obvious battle stations in December — and as Bill King pointed out further up…even more blatantly obvious since Christmas.
One can only image what the prices of a whole raft of physical commodities would be if their respective prices weren’t being managed…especially the following Big 6.
As I quoted in today’s headline title…”There are no markets anymore…only interventions”…now applies across the board — and it’s obvious to anyone with more than two synapse to rub together. Even the mainstream media has a complete grasp of the obvious now — and saying so. How long this will last is anyone’s guess, but The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets…a.k.a…the Plunge Protection Team, has been hard at it lately…with the last couple of days being the poster children for that.
Of course these interventions have always been around in the precious metal market — and that obvious in the daily charts from Kitco at the top of today’s column — and in the 6-month charts posted below.
You have probably read about this by now, but the reason the stock market made a miraculous recovery last week was because of one massive multi-billion dollar buy order.
Today’s post-Christmas rally is brought to you not by the PPT, but by pensions funds which waited until the very last minute to buy up to $64 billion in stocks as part of their quarter-end rebalancing.
Despite the dollar weakness, crude prices collapsed further as PMs rallied…
Gold soared (in dollars) on the day…
Breaking above its 200DMA…
And gold in yuan broke out of its channel…
Archived Newsletters
Market Report
International Storage
Private Safe Deposit Boxes
Unencumbered / Segregated Storage
About Miles Franklin
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David’s son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin’s primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do.
We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, Jim Sinclair, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
For your protection, we are licensed, regulated, bonded and background checked per Minnesota State law.
Miles Franklin
801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 834
Wayzata, MN 55391
1-800-822-8080
Categories
Base Metals Exclusive Interviews Junior Mining Precious Metals

GROUP TEN METALS Exploring for PGE’s in Montana

Michael Rowley, president and CEO of Group Ten Metals sits down with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable to discuss his companies exploration for platinum, palladium, nickel, copper and cobalt in the Stillwater area of Montana. Specifically, Mr. Rowley will address the latest press release regarding hybrid zone consisting of 14 target areas, 6 of which Higher-Grade ‘Reef Zones’ and 8 of which are large scale bulk tonnage “Platreef-Style’ Mineralization.

VIDEO

AUDIO

TRANSCRIPT

Original Source: https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/12/27/exploring-for-pges-in-montana.html

Exploring for PGEs in Montana 
Contributed Opinion

Source: Maurice Jackson for Streetwise Reports  (12/27/18)

Maurice JacksonMichael Rowley, president and CEO of Group Ten Metals, speaks with Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable about his company’s recent PGE discoveries in Montana and the similarities to projects in South Africa’s Platreef District.

Platinum bars
Maurice Jackson: Joining us today is Michael Rowley, the president and CEO of Group Ten Metals Inc. (PGE:TSX.V; PGEZF:OTC), which is exploring for platinum, palladium, nickel, copper and cobalt in the Stillwater district of Montana.
Mr. Rowley, we have some exciting developments to discuss for current and perspective shareholders, but before we begin, for someone new to the story, who is Group Ten Metals and what is the thesis you’re attempting to prove?

Michael Rowley: Group Ten Metals is a growth stage company, focused on PGM, platinum group metals, plus nickel, copper, also cobalt, the so-called technology battery metals. We have polymetallic deposits as these things occur together; we’re focused primarily at the Stillwater West Project in Montana. We also have assets in the Yukon and a gold project in Ontario.
Maurice Jackson: Group Ten Metals just issued a press release announcing a new discovery hybrid zone and some targets at the Stillwater West. Multi-layered question, sir, can you update us on the Stillwater West, expand on the findings, and tell us what they mean moving forward?
Michael Rowley: Stillwater West is our newest project; we made our first acquisition there in 2017. It’s a remarkable land position and database in a truly world-class district. The Stillwater name, the district is synonymous with the richest palladium, platinum mines in the world, a staggering 90 million ounces in past production and current reserves producing from three mines at over half an ounce per ton, 16 grams per ton.

It’s platinum and palladium rich; palladium, of course, is very significant right now given that palladium is challenging gold as the most valuable precious metal. We are above and below Stillwater in this layered system and because of that we have not only the same potential for palladium and platinum, platinum group metals in general, but we also get to expand our target to these truly polymetallic things including nickel, copper, cobalt, palladium. We recently added to that list, also, rhodium, and we have some significant gold.
This is truly elephant country. It’s the biggest PGM deposit outside of South Africa and Russia and, of course, it was bought by Sibanye our neighbor for $2.2 billion in 2017. So we’re the only other player in the district. It’s a fantastic place to be, we’re very excited.
You brought up the most recent news release, December 17. The Hybrid Zone is one of our targets in the Chrome mountain area and an exciting new discovery. We mention up to 150 meters of mineralized intervals there in this new style of mineralization. What’s exciting is this has never been recognized in camp before and it ties into the Bushveld Complex of South Africa and, despite the known similarities between these districts, Stillwater has never been examined systematically for that potential.
So in a nutshell, we are taking the lessons learned at the Mogalakwena Mine and Ivanhoe’s Platreef project and applying them to the similar geology in Montana Stillwater in a way that nobody’s done before. I guess final point to wrap that up is the team that we’ve attracted includes a number of renowned experts on this type of deposit, but most recently David Broughton of Ivanhoe, so we’ve actually attracted expertise and talent of a world caliber on the project.
Maurice Jackson: Can you further expand on the new 14 target areas?
Stillwater West
Michael Rowley: We have as a result of our efforts in 2018, being our first season on the ground, we’ve identified 14 target areas in Stillwater West, six of them fit the high-grade PGE reef type targets that the district is known for, in particular our neighbor Stillwater Sibanye Mines. However, 8 of the 14 targets are these newer Platreef style targets where we see potential for large-scale bulk-mineable disseminated sulfide mineralization of the types seen on the Platreef District of South Africa, and that’s in the basal zones and the lower ultramafic series in Stillwater.
And that’s the greater potential we see there for these hundred million ounce style PGE nickel/copper deposits, also cobalt actually, at Stillwater, and news flow will be ongoing in the coming weeks and months as we reveal the results of our work in 2018, and our plans for 2019.
Maurice Jackson: And what are the target commodities at the Stillwater?
Michael Rowley: It’s a true polymetallic system; the district itself is known for having the highest-grade palladium platinum lines in the world, and that is the three operating Stillwater mines that were bought by Sibanye in 2017, in our part of the district, in the lower part you can also add to that list gold, cobalt, and chrome are significant and we are recently finding indications of potentially significant vanadium and rhodium, you can add to that list as well.
So this suite of commodities, in particular the palladium, in light of what palladium is doing in the markets these days, positions Group Ten as one of very few options in terms of PGE investment opportunity for investors, especially if one included geography in that, being that we are outside of South Africa and Russia, in North America.
Maurice Jackson: Sir, what is the next unanswered question for Group Ten Metals, when should we expect results, and what determines success?
Michael Rowley: Good questions, news flow will be ongoing in the coming weeks, assays are coming in as we speak, we’re entering them into our models and planning our strategy around that, so we’re excited by what we see. I think the most exciting aspect of news is going to be the results of re-logging and modeling the more than 12,000 meters of core that we have in our possession, as we said earlier, no one has brought this land position together with the South African Platreef models, along with this physical core, so bringing these things together, and for the first time looking at this district systematically for the potential for these styles of deposits. It’s very exciting and I think the first quarter of 2019 you’ll see some very interesting news releases and materials along that line.
We will be at the major trade shows, we’ll have core on display at the January shows in Vancouver, and we’ll be at the PDAC in Toronto in March as well, and we look forward to seeing anybody and everybody there.
Maurice Jackson: Sir, we’ve covered the good, what keeps you up at tight that we don’t know about?
Michael Rowley: Well, frankly, our share price isn’t where I’d like it to be and I don’t think it reflects the potential of the company, that is of course seasonal and the juniors (miners) do generally get hit harder this time of year, however, gold has held up very nicely, and other commodities are following it, and the majors have moved up nicely. So I think we can expect a good rebound in 2019 from the mining sector, and from the juniors, and then, of course, there was also our own work, especially Stillwater I think will get some nice life, in addition to the rising tide, that floats all boats.
Maurice Jackson: Finally, what did I forget to ask?

Michael Rowley: Well, it’s not that you forgot to ask, but let’s revisit and touch on something we’ve talked about before, the fact that 75% of the world’s PGM metals come out of South Africa—this has been written up very well recently by the CMP group out of New York—a lot of those mines are facing closures, they’ve been underfunded for years, and this is expected to drive the platinum price substantially into the year 2020.
Palladium, of course, is already up and platinum is expected to follow. It’s worth noting, perhaps, that those are reef mines, they’re deep, they’re hot, they’re expensive, they’re dangerous, the mines of a Platreef, north of the Bushveld, are our current model with Stillwater, and those are highly economic and they keep producing, and that’s what we expect to bring to Stillwater for everyone’s benefit.
Maurice Jackson: Mr. Rowley for someone listening that wants to get more information on Group Ten Metals, what is the website address?
Michael Rowley: Website is grouptenmetals.com.
Maurice Jackson: And as a reminder, Group Ten Metals trades on the TXS.V:PGE, and on the OTCQB:PGEZF; for direct inquiries please contact Chris Ackerman at 604-357-4790 extension 1, or email info@grouptenmetals.com, as reminder Group Ten Metals is a sponsor of Proven and Probable, and we are proud shareholders for the virtues conveyed into today’s interview. Last but not least, please visit our website www.provenandprobable.com where we interview the most respected names in the natural resource space. You may reach us at contact@provenandprobable.com.
Michael Rowley of Group Ten Metals, thank you for joining us today on Proven and Probable.
Maurice Jackson is the founder of Proven and Probable, a site that aims to enrich its subscribers through education in precious metals and junior mining companies that will enrich the world.

Disclosure: 

1) Maurice Jackson: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: Group Ten Metals. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: Group Ten Metals is a sponsor of Proven and Probable. Proven and Probable disclosures are listed below.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click herefor important disclosures about sponsor fees.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article until three business days after the publication of the interview or article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.
Proven and Probable LLC receives financial compensation from its sponsors. The compensation is used is to fund both sponsor-specific activities and general report activities, website, and general and administrative costs. Sponsor-specific activities may include aggregating content and publishing that content on the Proven and Probable website, creating and maintaining company landing pages, interviewing key management, posting a banner/billboard, and/or issuing press releases. The fees also cover the costs for Proven and Probable to publish sector-specific information on our site, and also to create content by interviewing experts in the sector. Monthly sponsorship fees range from $1,000 to $4,000 per month. Proven and Probable LLC does accept stock for payment of sponsorship fees. Sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
The Information presented in Proven and Probable is provided for educational and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. You should not make any decision, financial, investments, trading or otherwise, based on any of the information presented on this forum without undertaking independent due diligence and consultation with a professional broker or competent financial advisor. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum at your own risk.
Images provided by the author.

Categories
Precious Metals

SPROTT’S THOUGHTS Dow vs Gold Performance

Greetings,
Gold is doing what we have expected it to do lately.
Enjoy your holidays.
Steve
Steve Todoruk
Sprott Global Resource Investments, Ltd.
1910 Palomar Point Way, Suite 200 Carlsbad, CA 92008
(800) 477-7853  | eFax: 760-683-6839
Member FINRA/SIPC
This information is for information purposes only and is not intended to be an offer or solicitation for the sale of any financial product or service or a recommendation or determination by Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. that any investment strategy is suitable for a specific investor. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the suitability of any investment strategy based on the objectives of the investor, financial situation, investment horizon, and their particular needs. This information is not intended to provide financial, tax, legal, accounting or other professional advice since such advice always requires consideration of individual circumstances. The products discussed herein are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested.
Generally, natural resources investments are more volatile on a daily basis and have higher headline risk than other sectors as they tend to be more sensitive to economic data, political and regulatory events as well as underlying commodity prices. Natural resource investments are influenced by the price of underlying commodities like oil, gas, metals, coal, etc.; several of which trade on various exchanges and have price fluctuations based on short-term dynamics partly driven by demand/supply and nowadays also by investment flows. Natural resource investments tend to react more sensitively to global events and economic data than other sectors, whether it is a natural disaster like an earthquake, political upheaval in the Middle East or release of employment data in the U.S. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investing in foreign markets may entail greater risks than those normally associated with domestic markets, such as political, currency, economic and market risks. You should carefully consider whether trading in low priced and international securities is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Sprott Global, entities that it controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may hold positions in the securities it recommends to clients, and may sell the same at any time. 
Sprott Global Resource Investments, Inc. | 1910 Palomar Point WaySuite 200Carlsbad, CA 92008

Sign up to Stay Up to Date on News and Progress from Page