Categories
Blog

TOM WHEELWRIGHT | This Is Why Depreciation Is Like Magic

I think depreciation is like magic.

When done properly, it can take rental real estate with positive cash flow and turn it into a loss for tax purposes.

ATTENTION CPAs!

You’re invited to The CPA-Revolution Masterclass with me.

This is a 3 day, transformative educational experience, custom-built for CPAs.

(Plus it includes 20 hours of CPE credit – for FREE!)

Dec 6-8, 2018

Click below (or click here) to learn more.

Learn More and Register

It’s common to break out land and building in a rental property for depreciation purposes, but there are many more components to consider. These additional components may include appliances, parking structures, landscaping, furniture, fixtures, and much more. Most importantly, these additional components can be depreciated much faster than land and building.

The result is accelerated depreciation which means more depreciation can be taken sooner.

Keep this in mind: Accelerated depreciation is a long term strategy

The decision to accelerate depreciation should be part of a long term tax strategy. While the tax benefits can come immediately, there needs to be a focus on the future to truly maximize the benefits.

Accelerated depreciation often results in more gain when the property is sold.

On top of that, the depreciation taken may be recaptured when the property is sold which means a portion of the gain (the portion attributable to the depreciation) may be taxed at ordinary tax rates.

So how is any of this good news for accelerated depreciation?

Here’s how. The worst case scenario with accelerated depreciation is that the tax is deferred to a later year. You take the bigger deductions now, enjoy the tax savings now and then pay tax on it later in the form of more gain.

If you’ve heard me speak, then you probably know deferral is my least favorite type of tax planning, so you may be wondering why I think accelerated depreciation is so important in a tax strategy.

The reason is that deferral is the worst case outcome, and as far as tax planning goes, while deferral isn’t my favorite, it can still help minimize taxes. So even the worst case scenario is still good for tax planning.

But even better, there are other possible outcomes that can reduce or eliminate the future tax impact of accelerated depreciation.

A long term strategy is the solution to minimizing or eliminating the future tax impact of accelerated depreciation.

Here are a few examples:

Strategy #1

Not all depreciation recapture is taxed as ordinary income. Some depreciation recapture has a lower tax rate. This means you take the deduction at a higher rate and report the income at a lower rate – this results in permanent tax savings.

The key is making sure you are in the right tax brackets now and in the future.

Strategy #2

Another example is using like-kind exchanges in your long term tax strategy. With like-kind exchanges, it is possible to avoid depreciation recapture entirely.

Strategy #3

If your long term strategy is to hold the property and pass it to your heirs, then that can work to avoid depreciation recapture.

Strategy #4

A plan to regularly buy rental property can provide a steady source of accelerated depreciation and compensate for lower depreciation on properties entering the older stages of their depreciable lives.

While there can be many traps with accelerated depreciation, there are also many ways to plan around them with a long term strategy.

Dec 6-8, 2018

If you already have a trusted tax advisor…

..be sure to tell them about my FREE, 3 Day event just for CPAs, the CPA-Revolution Masterclass. Just forward this email, and click here to learn more about the event.

We’ve updated our Terms of Use – click here to review them now.

Tom Wheelwright, CPA

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any US federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you are not the original addressee of this communication, you should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent advisor.

Unsubscribe

WealthAbility
1501 W Fountainhead Pkwy #650
Tempe, Arizona 85282
United States
(480) 565-8000

Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Rise Gold Issues Stock Options

Vancouver, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – November 30, 2018) – Rise Gold Corp. (CSE: RISE) (OTCQB: RYES) (“Rise Gold” or the “Company“) announces the grant of 2,900,000 stock options to employees and directors of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Stock Option Plan. The options are exercisable at $0.10 per share for a period of five (5) years and expire on November 29, 2023.

About Rise Gold Corp

Rise Gold is an exploration-stage mining company. The Company’s principal asset is the historic past-producing Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine located in Nevada County, California, USA. The Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine is a past producing gold mine with total past production of 2,414,000 oz of gold at an average mill head grade of 17 gpt gold from 1866-1955. Historic production at the Idaho-Maryland Mine is disclosed in the Technical Report on the Idaho-Maryland Project dated June 1st, 2017 and available on www.sedar.com. Rise Gold is incorporated in Nevada, USA and maintains its head office in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

On behalf of the Board of Directors:

Benjamin Mossman
President, CEO and Director
Rise Gold Corp.

For further information, please contact:

RISE GOLD CORP.
Suite 650, 669 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 0B4
T: 604.260.4577
info@risegoldcorp.com
www.risegoldcorp.com

The CSE has not reviewed, approved or disapproved the contents of this news release.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions related to certain factors including, without limitation, obtaining all necessary approvals, meeting expenditure and financing requirements, compliance with environmental regulations, title matters, operating hazards, metal prices, political and economic factors, competitive factors, general economic conditions, relationships with vendors and strategic partners, governmental regulation and supervision, seasonality, technological change, industry practices, and one-time events that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information contained in this release. Rise undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements or information except as required by law.

Categories
Base Metals Energy Precious Metals Project Generators

PROJECT GENERATOR | EMX Royalty Provides Additional Disclosure on Discretionary Bonuses

Vancouver, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – November 30, 2018) –  EMX Royalty Corporation (TSXV: EMX) (NYSE American: EMX) (the “Company” or “EMX”)provides additional disclosure regarding the US$3.8 million in bonuses announced in its asset portfolio and corporate update on November 28, 2018. This additional disclosure includes a summary of the rationale, approval process, recipients, and allocations related to the bonus.

Bonus Rationale

The Board awarded the bonuses to EMX’s management and staff in respect of their seven years of effort to monetize the Company’s investment in IG Copper LLC (“IGC”). Their efforts included:

(1) identification of the investment opportunity;
(2) providing significant technical oversight towards the discovery of a world class copper deposit at Malmyzh;
(3) raising the capital necessary to advance Malmyzh despite challenging markets and jurisdictional risks;
(4) coordinating the sales effort for Malmyzh over a period of several years;
(5) managing an exit with Freeport, including arranging an US$18.5 million bridge loan, which led to a greater return for all of IGC’s shareholders, not the least of which was EMX 40% shareholding; and
(6) assisting IGC with the successful sale of Malmyzh to a wholly owned subsidiary of Russian Copper Company (“RCC”) in October for US$200 million.

The transaction with RCC took 10 months to complete and required numerous complicated steps, including obtaining approval from the Russian Federal Anti-Monopoly Service. The successful outcome was due, in large part, to the significant efforts of EMX’s team, IGC’s team, and IGC’s advisors, Scotia Bank Europe plc and the London office of Norton Rose Fulbright LLP. In the opinion of EMX’s Board of Directors, this was sound and proper rationale for the bonuses paid.

Bonus Approval Process

Prior to the Malmyzh sales transaction, EMX’s management had developed a bonus plan for strategic investments whereby 7.5% of the after-tax profits of an individual investment could be paid as a bonus to EMX’s management and staff. As part of the bonus calculation, the Company’s cost basis was increased annually by 10% to reflect the time value of the investment.

The strategic investment bonus calculation, along with management’s recommended allocation of bonuses, was then submitted to the Compensation Committee of EMX’s Board for its review. The Compensation Committee is comprised of three independent directors. The Committee met several times over the past four months, both with management and independently of management, as part of the approval process. The Committee recommended the US$3.8 million bonus pool and allocation to the Company’s Board. The independent members of the Board unanimously approved the bonus pool and allocation with Dave Cole and Michael Winn abstaining from voting.

Bonus Allocation

The Board has awarded the bonuses to EMX’s Chairman and all of EMX’s management and staff (which includes support staff in Vancouver provided by Seabord Services Corp). Bonuses were not paid outside the Company.

The two largest awards were paid to David Cole and Michael Winn as they actively managed the Company’s investment in IGC for the past seven years. The Compensation Committee also felt it was important to award significant bonuses to senior management regardless of time spent on the investment as a win of this type is a team effort. The bonus allocations are as follows:

Name Position
Amount
(US$)
David M. Cole1 President & CEO 1,100,000
Michael Winn1 Chairman of the Board 1,000,000
Eric Jensen1 General Manager – Exploration 400,000
Dave Johnson1 Chief Geologist 400,000
Christina Cepeliauskas Chief Financial Officer 175,000
Jan Steiert Chief Legal Officer 175,000
Other EMX Staff 560,000
TOTAL 3,810,000

1 A portion of the bonuses to be paid to Dave Cole, Michael Winn, Eric Jensen,and Dave Johnson will be paid once the Company receives the final distribution by IGC related to escrowed funds.


About EMX.
 EMX leverages asset ownership and exploration insight into partnerships that advance our mineral properties, with EMX receiving pre-production payments and retaining royalty interests. EMX complements its royalty generation initiatives with royalty acquisitions and strategic investments.

The recent advancements of the Company’s asset portfolio underscore EMX’s focus on steadily increasing global revenue streams from strategic investments, royalties, and other payments. The Company’s goal is to substantially grow our cash flowing royalty portfolio while providing multiple opportunities for exploration and production success.

For further information contact:

David M. Cole
President and Chief Executive Officer
Phone: (303) 979-6666
Email: Dave@EMXroyalty.com

Scott Close
Director of Investor Relations
Phone: (303) 973-8585
Email:SClose@EMXroyalty.com

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release may contain forward looking statements that reflect the Company’s current expectations and projections about its future results. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates, work programs, capital expenditures, timelines, strategic plans, market prices for precious and base metal, or other statements that are not statements of fact. When used in this news release, words such as estimate, intend, expect, anticipate, will“, “believe”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which, by their very nature, are not guarantees of the Company’s future operational or financial performance, and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause the Company‘s actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors may include, but are not limited to: unavailability of financing, failure to identify commercially viable mineral reserves, fluctuations in the market valuation for commodities, difficulties in obtaining required approvals for the development of a mineral project, increased regulatory compliance costs, expectations of project funding by joint venture partners and other factors.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this news release or as of the date otherwise specifically indicated herein. Due to risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties identified in this news release, and other risk factors and forward-looking statements listed in the Company’s MD&A for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 (the“MD&A”), and the most recently filed Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017actual events may differ materially from current expectations. More information about the Company, including the MD&A, the 20-F and financial statements of the Company, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the SEC’s EDGAR website at www.sec.gov.

Categories
Precious Metals

MILES FRANKLIN | Will Silver Shorts End Up Like ShortSellers.com?

Chris Marcus-Contributing Writer For Miles Franklin
Will Silver Shorts End Up Like ShortSellers.com?
Written by Chris Marcus of Miles Franklin
Last week a fund called OptionSellers.com blew up. Primarily because they aggressively shorted an asset and left themselves with virtually unlimited risk. Which when the market moved against them, not only wiped out all of their capital. But left some customers actually even owing additional money.
Which is worthwhile to take note of for those involved in the silver market. Where there is an unbacked paper short position that cannot be covered with physical metal. And has left many exposed to an outcome potentially quite similar to what the investors of the OptionSellers.com fund just experienced.
For a long time it was the bullion banks that owned the majority of the short position. Although in recent years that has amazingly been unwound, and passed off to the technical hedge funds that now own it. Which means that the investors of these funds are short an asset with virtually unlimited upside whenever the paper vs. physical imbalance is resolved.
Will Silver Shorts End Up Like ShortSellers com
Now being short silver at $14 simply because the 50 or 200 day moving average moved lower never really struck me as a significant enough reason to be short. Especially when the supply and demand fundamentals indicating an eventual move to the upside remain so pronounced. Now even more so following the recent news that J.P. Morgan traders have indeed been manipulating the market, with further attention being placed on the case.
As a result, the conditions for the short squeeze of a lifetime are in place. Which means that at the same time silver is rising, these funds are going to have to buy back their position. But from who? Certainly after the banks have gone to all of the effort of unwinding their short position and now getting long, it’s hard to imagine them letting the hedge funds off the hook easily.
And this is one of the dangers of being short any asset. Because every night you go to sleep with virtually unlimited risk. Which in this case I’m guessing most of the investors in these funds don’t even realize they are exposed to.
As a former equity options market maker on the New York Stock Exchange, I’m well familiar with the risks of being short. Especially being short options. Which is not to say that there are not appropriate times to short an asset, but rather that it’s darn well worth being aware of the risk. Especially now as the investors of the OptionSellers.com fund found out that they can lose even more than their original investment.
While investing in precious metals, and silver in particular over the past decade has not been the easiest and most rewarding experience, it has been one of the more fascinating financial events to follow along.
Especially now as the rumors of manipulation are being increasingly documented and supported by legal confessions and guilty pleas. Indicating that those who have explained the pricing as being distorted by manipulation have turned out to be correct. And with those who were correct on that matter also continuing to reiterate that prices at some point are simply going to have to rise.
If you are invested in one of these funds that is short silver, I would highly recommend taking a look at this report that explains why the price of silver is set to explode. Because outside of the technical funds reacting to the moving averages, I haven’t even heard of anyone attempting to make a case for why silver would go much lower from here (if you have, or if you have any questions about this article or the market, please email me here).
So given all of the factors indicating why at some point the price will almost necessarily have to rise, pulling your money out of a fund that is short silver and getting long yourself (much like the banks controlling the action have done) remains a timely way of avoiding Wall Street’s latest upcoming debacle.
While also keeping your money safe and taking advantage of the eventual resolution of this glaring market imbalance.
-To buy or sell gold and silver call Miles Franklin today at (1-800-822-8080).
-Or get Miles Franklin’s detailed report on why the price of silver is set to explode.
Archived Newsletters
Market Report 11/28/2018
International Storage
Private Safe Deposit Boxes
Unencumbered / Segregated Storage
About Miles Franklin
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David’s son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin’s primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do.
We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, Jim Sinclair, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
For your protection, we are licensed, regulated, bonded and background checked per Minnesota State law.
Miles Franklin
801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 834
Wayzata, MN 55391
1-800-822-8080
Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved.
Categories
Precious Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Great Bear Reports Continuity of Gold from Surface to 365 m Depth in Dixie Limb Zone, Dixie Project, Red Lake District

Vancouver, British Columbia–(Newsfile Corp. – November 29, 2018) – Great Bear Resources (TSXV: GBR) (the “Company” or “Great Bear”, TSX-V: GBR) today reported results from drilling of the Dixie Limb Zone (“DLZ”) completed during the Company’s summer 2018 drill program, and designed to test continuity of gold mineralization to depth. The DLZ is a multi-kilometre gold-mineralized contact that is located north of Great Bear’s recent high grade gold discoveries at the Hinge and South Limb Zones, and was the target of most historical drilling.

Great Bear also reports that 15 additional drill holes have now been completed in the Hinge and South Limb Zones (“SLZ”). Results are expected in one to two weeks and are not included in this news release.

Great Bear has systematically surveyed 108 historical drill collars and completed gyroscopic downhole surveys of 66 historical drill holes within the DLZ to-date. Results indicate many historical holes were mis-located, with maximum deviations approaching 100 metres, and historical drill directions deviated significantly from plan due to magnetic host rocks. These errors led to incorrect historical interpretations including that gold mineralization in the DLZ occurred in en-echelon lens-like zones lacking vertical continuity.

The Company tested vertical continuity of the DLZ’s gold mineralization with a series of 9 drill holes from 26 metres to 365 metres depth. All holes tested areas previously interpreted as unmineralized and cited as lacking geological continuity. All holes successfully intersected gold mineralization.

Highlights of the latest 9 drill holes testing the DLZ include:

  • Intercepts of 6.71 g/t gold over 3.10 metres and 6.16 g/t gold over 2.30 metres, establishing continuity of gold mineralization into areas previously deemed to be unmineralized
  • DLZ mineralization generally increases in thickness and gold grade with depth
  • Intervals of higher grades (>6 g/t gold) were intersected in 5 of the 9 holes
  • A newly identified parallel mineralized zone was intersected in one of the two deepest holes at 307 metres vertical depth in drill hole DL-031

Chris Taylor, President and CEO of Great Bear said, “While much of the past exploration work at Dixie was high quality, later interpretations of zone geometries were hampered by incorrect data. Using oriented drill core and gyroscopic surveys, we have cut through the effects of the magnetic background rocks which skewed past drilling and observe a consistent mineralized zone at the DLZ structure, including several steeply-plunging high-grade zones. This mineralization is open along strike and at depth. While more than 360 metres of continuity is a strong start, gold deposits in Red Lake often extend to kilometres of depth, and from that perspective we are only just scratching the surface of this zone’s potential.”

The most recent drill results are provided in Table 1. Highlighted results from the 2.3 kilometres of strike length of the DLZ drilled to-date are provided in Table 2. A summary of results of ongoing historical drill hole surveying is provided in Table 3. An updated long section of the DLZ including names and locations of various high-grade zones that will be targeted during the current drill program are provided in Figure 1. A map of current drill collars is provided in Figure 2.

Table 1: New drill results from the DLZ, showing vertical depth of intercepts. Drilling targeted previously interpreted unmineralized areas. Drilling is insufficient to determine true widths.

Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Width (m) Gold (g/t) Vert. Depth (m)
DL-028 34.60 39.70 5.10 4.34 26
DL-028 including 35.60 38.70 3.10 6.71
DL-028 and including 36.10 38.20 2.10 8.10
DL-032 61.95 67.35 5.40 1.06 40
DL-029 46.70 50.70 4.00 3.23 41
DL-029 including 47.70 49.60 1.90 4.44
DL-029 and 76.00 78.00 2.00 3.33 69
DL-026 81.55 84.00 2.45 2.48 69
DL-026 83.40 84.00 0.60 4.59
DL-030 74.20 76.50 2.30 2.64 69
DL-027 382.70 403.50 20.80 1.60 304
DL-027 and including 387.30 388.30 1.00 6.09
DL-027 and including 387.30 387.80 0.50 10.70
DL-027 and including 397.50 399.00 1.50 4.46
DL-031 Zone 1 335.20 337.50 2.30 6.16 257
DL-031 including 336.30 337.50 1.20 9.27
DL-031 Zone 2 423.25 433.85 10.60 1.39 324
DL-031 including 432.00 433.85 1.85 3.84
DL-031 and including 432.00 432.60 0.60 6.03
DL-037 334.70 349.60 14.90 1.85 321
DL-037 including 335.30 335.85 0.55 7.74
DL-037 and 344.90 346.85 1.95 6.32
DL-036a 358.50 362.10 3.60 2.50 346
DL-036a including 360.50 362.10 1.60 5.12
DL-036a and including 361.60 362.10 0.50 10.17
DL-036a and 368.45 377.90 9.45 2.38
DL-036a and including 369.60 371.25 1.65 4.07
DL-036a and including 377.40 377.90 0.50 15.67 365

Table 2: Highlighted results from previous DLZ drilling to-date

Drill Hole From(m) To(m) Width(m) Gold(g/t) Vertical Depth (m)
DL-04-04 228.15 232.77 4.62 9.75 190
DL-04-06 333.3 345.67 12.34 7.54 323
including 335.42 342.49 7.07 12.26
and incl. 335.42 336.88 1.46 40.27
DL-11-05 132.2 138.5 6.30 10.78 116
including 134.7 138.5 3.80 14.76
and incl. 135.8 137 1.20 30.48
DL-005 162.6 173 10.40 16.84 128
including 164.6 172.45 7.85 21.53
and including 171.4 172.45 1.05 130.10
DNW-001 52.6 58.2 5.60 3.52 38
including 56.8 58.2 1.40 12.74
DL-013 47.7 88 40.30 1.73 40
including 47.7 50 2.30 6.01
including 58 70.3 12.30 3.13

Table 3: Surveying results to-date showing deviations in historical results

Type
Number of Holes 
Completed To-Date
Results
Differential GPS
survey of drill
collar locations
225
(104 historic)
Average horizontal shift of 4.39 m. Maximum horizontal shift of +/- 83.0 m E and +/- 51.72 m N. Average vertical shift of 4.03 m. Maximum vertical shift of +/- 51.67 m.
Non-magnetic
(gyroscopic)
downhole survey
66 Average deviation change of 7.95 m at the end of each drill hole. Maximum shift of 148 m at end of drill hole. Significant errors were also observed by Great Bear geologists when using a compass at surface.
Re-logging and
sampling of
historic core
35 Identified key lithological units and collected 1,566 samples for gold and ICP analysis

Figure 1: Long section through the DLZ as drilled to-date showing currently reported drill results and locations of planned drill holes. The “88-4”, “5”, “Gap” and “88-4 Extension” zones are shown. All drill holes that intersect the DLZ contact in this area are shown. Areas without pierce points or composite intervals have not yet been drilled. Zone is open along strike and at depth.

Cannot view this image? Visit: http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/homerun/newsfile_64/0a3ee59eb2f7784731541703b3919009
Cannot view this image? Visit: http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/homerun/newsfile_64/0a3ee59eb2f7784731541703b3919009

To view an enhanced version of Figure 1, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/5331/41347_d19702c8b4f2abf0_002full.jpg

The Company is now conducting a 30,000 metre, 150 drill hole drill program that is expected to continue through 2018 and 2019. Targets to be drilled include the Hinge Zone, SLZ and DLZ, as well as a number of newly defined, highly prospective geological and structural targets across the project. Results will continue to be released in batches as received.

Highlights of all of Great Bear’s drill results can be viewed at the Company’s web site at www.greatbearresources.ca

Figure 2: Plan map showing updated collar locations of current and pending drill results

Cannot view this image? Visit: http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/homerun/newsfile_64/80a39ba4918c35e40bdb91bc77c7d941
Cannot view this image? Visit: http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/homerun/newsfile_64/80a39ba4918c35e40bdb91bc77c7d941

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/5331/41347_d19702c8b4f2abf0_003full.jpg

About Great Bear

The Dixie property is located approximately 15 minutes’ drive along Highway 105 from downtown Red Lake, Ontario. The Red Lake mining district has produced over 30,000,000 ounces of gold and is one of the premier mining districts in Canada, benefitting from major active mining operations including the Red Lake Gold Mine of Goldcorp Inc., plus modern infrastructure and a skilled workforce. The Dixie property covers a drill and geophysically defined multi-kilometre gold mineralized structure similar to that hosting other producing gold mines in the district. In addition, Great Bear is also earning a 100% royalty-free interest in its West Madsen properties which total 3,860 hectares and are contiguous with Pure Gold Mining Inc.’s Madsen property. All of Great Bear’s Red Lake projects are accessible year-round through existing roads.

Drill core is logged and sampled in a secure core storage facility located in Red Lake Ontario. Core samples from the program are cut in half, using a diamond cutting saw, and are sent to Activation Laboratories Ltd. in Ancaster Ontario, and SGS Canada Inc. in Red Lake, Ontario, both of which are accredited mineral analysis laboratories, for analysis. All samples are analyzed for gold using standard Fire Assay-AA techniques. Samples returning over 3.0 g/t gold are analyzed utilizing standard Fire Assay-Gravimetric methods. Certified gold reference standards, blanks and field duplicates are routinely inserted into the sample stream, as part of Great Bear’s quality control/quality assurance program (QAQC). No QAQC issues were noted with the results reported herein.

Mr. R. Bob Singh, P.Geo, Director and VP Exploration for Great Bear, is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 responsible for the accuracy of technical information contained in this news release.

For further information please contact Mr. Chris Taylor, P.Geo, President and CEO at 604-646-8354, or Mr. Knox Henderson, Investor Relations, at 604-551-2360.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

“Chris Taylor”

Chris Taylor, President and CEO

Inquiries:
Tel: 604-646-8354
Fax: 604-646-4526
info@greatbearresources.ca
www.greatbearresources.ca

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This new release may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in the management discussion and analysis section of our interim and most recent annual financial statement or other reports and filings with the TSX Venture Exchange and applicable Canadian securities regulations. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

We seek safe harbor

Categories
Energy

URANIUM | Western Uranium & Vanadium Provides Sunday Mine Complex Re-opening Update

TORONTO and NUCLA, Colo., Nov. 28, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (CSE:WUC) (WSTRF) (“Western” or the ”Company”) wishes to provide an update regarding its announced re-opening of the Sunday Mine Complex (“SMC”) to address shareholder questions with respect to Western’s ore processing. Western is commencing this program with the goals of further defining its large vanadium resource and monetizing that resource. Western is in discussions with a number of large offshore companies who have the existing facilities to recover the vanadium contained in the SMC ore.  The worldwide shortage of vanadium is impacting many companies around the world and thus making offtake agreements available for ore production. Initially ore will be shipped to existing offshore processing facilities with a longer term plan to build facilities in the United States. Once the SMC is opened, ore samples will be sent to the various interested parties for testing in their facilities. After testing, Western will negotiate offtake agreements to base load commercial production from the SMC.

As Western advances with its plans for re-opening of the SMC and is able to report on the timing of preparations, anticipated start dates and other milestones, Western will provide shareholders and investors with further updates.

In conjunction with the recent name change which reflects the increased importance of vanadium for the Company and the revised strategic approach to initiating production, Western has made updates to its website and corporate presentation. Further, a replay of George Glasier’s Silver & Gold Summit 2018 presentation has been uploaded to the media section of Western’s website. Please visit the Company website located at www.western-uranium.com for these updates.

About Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp.

Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. is a Colorado based uranium and vanadium conventional mining company focused on low cost near-term production of uranium and vanadium in the western United States, and development and application of ablation mining technology.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information: Certain information contained in this news release constitutes “forward-looking information” or a “forward-looking statement” within the meaning of applicable securities laws (collectively, “forward-looking statements”).  Statements of that nature include statements relating to, or that are dependent upon: the Company’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding exploration and production plans and results; the timing of planned activities; whether the Company can raise any additional funds required to implement its plans;  whether regulatory or analogous requirements can be satisfied to permit planned activities; and more generally to the Company’s business, and the economic and political environment applicable to its operations, assets and plans. All such forward-looking statements are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Please refer to the Company’s most recent Management’s Discussion and Analysis, as well as its other filings at www.sec.gov and/or www.sedar.com, for a more detailed review of those risk factors.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements, and that these statements are made as of the date hereof. While the Company may do so, it does not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements at any particular time, except as and to the extent required under applicable laws and regulations.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

George Glasier                                                                                 
President and CEO
970-864-2125
gglasier@western-uranium.com

Robert Klein
Chief Financial Officer
908-872-7686
rklein@western-uranium.com

Categories
Precious Metals

BOB MORIARTY | These 113 Analysts Believe Gold Will Go Parabolic to $3,000 or More!

Bob Moriarty
Archives

Nov 27, 2018

Lorimer Wilson January 24, 2011
$5,000 Gold Bandwagon Now Includes 85 Analysts!

More and more economists, analysts and financial writers, 125 in fact, have taken the bold step of projecting the price at which gold will achieve its parabolic peak with 5 individuals claiming that the peak price will be realized sometime in 2011. Some have adjusted their previous prognostications higher given gold’s strong advance again in 2010 while others have jumped aboard what has become a bandwagon of optimism. The majority (85) maintain that $5,000 or more for gold is possible.

These 5 Analysts Believe Gold Will Reach Parabolic Peak Sometime in 2011

  • 1. Bob Kirtley: $10,000;
  • 2. Patrick Kerr: $5,000 – $10,000;
  • 3. James Dines: $3,000 – $5,000;
  • 4. Taran Marwah: $3,000;
  • 5. Jim Sinclair: $3,000 – $5,000 (by June 2011);

These 6 Analysts See Gold Price Going Parabolic to +$10,000

  • 1. Mike Maloney: $15,000;
  • 2. Ben Davies: $10,000 – $15,000;
  • 3. Howard Katz: $14,000;
  • 4. Dr. Jeffrey Lewis: $7,000 – $14,000;
  • 5. Jim Rickards: $4,000 – $11,000;
  • 6. Roland Watson: $10,800

These 46 Analysts See Gold Price Peaking Between $5,001 and $10,000

  • 1. Bob Kirtley: $10,000 (by 2011);
  • 2. Arnold Bock: $10,000 (by 2012);
  • 3. Porter Stansberry: $10,000 (by 2012);
  • 4. Peter George: $10,000 (by Dec. 2015);
  • 5. Tom Fischer: $10,000;
  • 6. Shayne McGuire: $10,000;
  • 7. Eric Hommelberg: $10,000;
  • 8. David Petch: $6,000 – $10,000;
  • 9. Gerald Celente: $6,000 – $10,000;
  • 10. Egon von Greyerz: $6,000 – $10,000;
  • 11. Peter Schiff: $5,000 – $10,000 (in 5 to 10 years);
  • 12. Patrick Kerr: $5,000 – $10,000 (by 2011);
  • 13. Peter Millar: $5,000 – $10,000;
  • 14. Roger Wiegand: $5,000 – $10,000;
  • 15. Alf Field: $4,250 – $10,000;
  • 16. Jeff Nielson: $3,000 – $10,000;
  • 17. Dennis van Ek: $9,000 (by 2015);
  • 18. Dominic Frisby: $8,500;
  • 19. Paul Brodsky: $8,000;
  • 20. James Turk: $8,000 (by 2015);
  • 21. Joseph Russo: $7,000 – $8,000;
  • 22. Bob Chapman: $7,000+;
  • 23. Michael Rozeff: $2,865 – $7,151;
  • 24. Jim Willie: $7,000;
  • 25. Dylan Grice: $6,300;
  • 26. Chris Mack: $6,241.64 (by 2015);
  • 27. Chuck DiFalco: $6,214 (by 2018);
  • 28. Jeff Clark: $6,214;
  • 29. Aubie Baltin: $6,200 (by 2017);
  • 30. Murray Sabrin: $6,153;
  • 31. Samuel “Bud” Kress: $6,000 (by 2014);
  • 32. Adam Hamilton: $6,000;
  • 33. Robert Kientz: $6,000;
  • 34. Harry Schultz: $6,000;
  • 35. John Bougearel: $6,000;
  • 36. David Tice: $5,000 – $6,000;
  • 37. Laurence Hunt: $5,000 – $6,000 (by 2019);
  • 38. Taran Marwah: $3,000 – $6,000+ (by Dec. 2011 and Dec. 2012, respectively);
  • 39. Martin Hutchinson: $3,100 – $5,700;
  • 40. Stephen Leeb: $5,500 (by 2015);
  • 41. Louise Yamada: $5,200;
  • 42. Jeremy Charlesworth: $5,000+;
  • 43. Przemyslaw Radomski: $5,000+;
  • 44. Jason Hamlin: $5,000+;
  • 45. Greg McCoach: $5,000+ (by 2012)
  • 46. David McAlvany: $5,000+
  • Cumulative sub-total: 52

These 34 Analysts Believe Gold Price Could Go As High As $5,000

  • 1. David Rosenberg: $5,000;
  • 2. Doug Casey: $5,000;
  • 3. Peter Cooper: $5,000;
  • 4. Robert McEwen: $5,000 (by 2012 -2014);
  • 5. Martin Armstrong: $5,000 (by 2016);
  • 6. Peter Krauth: $5,000;
  • 7. Tim Iacono: $5,000 (by 2017);
  • 8. Christopher Wyke: $5,000;
  • 9. Frank Barbera: $5,000;
  • 10. John Lee: $5,000;
  • 11. Barry Dawes: $5,000;
  • 12. Bob Lenzer: $5,000 (by 2015);
  • 13. Steve Betts: $5,000;
  • 14. Stewart Thomson: $5,000;
  • 15. Charles Morris: $5,000 (by 2015);
  • 16. Marvin Clark: $5,000 (by 2015?);
  • 17. Eric Sprott: $5,000;
  • 18. Nathan Narusis: $5,000;
  • 19. Bud Conrad: $4,000 – $5,000;
  • 20. Paul Mylchreest: $4,000 -$5,000;
  • 21. Pierre Lassonde: $4,000 – $5,000;
  • 22. Willem Middelkoop: $4,000 – $5,000;
  • 23. Mary Anne and Pamela Aden: $3,000 – $5,000 (by February 2012);
  • 24. James Dines: $3,000 – $5,000 (by June 2011);
  • 25. Goldrunner: $3,000 – $5,000 (by 2012);
  • 26. Bill Murphy: $3,000 – $5,000;
  • 27. Bill Bonner: $3,000 – $5,000;
  • 28. Peter Degraaf; $2,500 – $5,000;
  • 29. Eric Janszen: $2,500 – $5,000;
  • 30. Larry Jeddeloh: $2,300 – $5,000 (by 2013);
  • 31. Larry Edelson: $2,300 – $5,000 (by 2015);
  • 32. Luke Burgess: $2,000 – $5,000;
  • 33. Jim Sinclair: $3,000-$5,000 (by June 2011);
  • 34. Marc Faber: $1,500 – $5,000
  • Cumulative sub-total: 86

These 27 Analysts Believe Gold Will Achieve a Parabolic Peak Price Between $3,000 and $4,999

  • 1. David Moenning: $4,525;
  • 2. Larry Reaugh: $4,000+;
  • 3. Mike Knowles: $4,000;
  • 4. Ian Gordon/Christopher Funston: $4,000;
  • 5. Barry Elias: $4,000; (by 2020);
  • 6. Jay Taylor: $3,000 – $4,000;
  • 7. Christian Barnard: $2,500 -$4,000;
  • 8. John Paulson: $2,400 – $4,000 (by 2012);
  • 9. Myles Zyblock : $3,800;
  • 10. Eric Roseman: $3,500+;
  • 11. Christopher Wood: $3,360;
  • 12. Franklin Sanders: $3,130;
  • 13. John Henderson: $3,000+ (by 2015-17);
  • 14. Michael Berry: $3,000+; (by 2015)
  • 15. Hans Goetti: $3,000;
  • 16. Michael Yorba: $3,000;
  • 17. David Urban: $3,000;
  • 18. Mitchell Langbert: $3,000;
  • 19. Brett Arends: $3,000;
  • 20. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: $3,000;
  • 21. John Williams: $3,000;
  • 22. Byron King: $3,000;
  • 23. Ron Paul: $3,000 (by 2020);
  • 24. Chris Weber: $3,000 (by 2020);
  • 25. Mark Leibovit: $3,000;
  • 26. Mark O’Byrne: $3,000;
  • 27. Kevin Kerr: $3,000
  • Cumulative sub-total: 113

Source:- http://www.munknee.com

There seems to be one name missing from the list. All those SWAGS have missed one important element. When you are talking about the price of gold, you are talking about two commodities, gold and whatever currency you are quoting the price in.
If you can’t predict the value of the dollar in the future with accuracy, you cannot predict the price of gold either.
Maybe they should have read what I think about “Experts” and “Gurus” in Nobody Knows Anything.
You should buy gold when it is cheap and unloved. You should then sell it when it is expensive and everyone loves it.

Categories
Precious Metals

MILES FRANKLIN | JP Morgan is Being Investing for PRICE FIXING by the Department of Justice (DOJ)

November 28, 2018
The Miles Franklin Newsletter
If your having trouble viewing this – Click Here
From The Desk Of David Schectman
David’s Commentary
Under normal conditions, gold and silver pretty much march along to the same drummer. But I expect it will be different, as we move ahead into 2019.
The price of silver is no longer following the price of gold in a “normal” manner. The 86 to 1 silver to gold ratio is telling us that silver is too cheap. Theonly question I have is how low will the ratio go in 2019? Will the ratio fall into the 70s or 60s or even lower? It is not a matter of “if,” it’s a matter of “when.”
What will happen to the price of silver if Da Boyzare able to hold the price of gold down? I believe it won’t matter; silver will move up regardless as the stretched-out silver/gold ratio starts correcting and moving lower. Jim Sinclair refers to silver as “gold on steroids.” That is the case on the way lower and on the way higher.
In today’s daily I will present two events that should allow silver to break free of the blatant manipulation that has kept its price way too low for way too long. Once silver breaks free from JPMorgan’s shorting positions on the Comex, and is able to trade freely, there is no telling how high the price will go and how fast it will happen. Even if the price of gold is contained, which is not exactly a given, there are still two reasons to be optimistic about silver next year, which will allow it to significantly outperform gold.
The first is the DOJ is looking closely at JPMorgan’s manipulation of silver. I cannot over-estimate just how important this event is.
The second is simply a supply/demand condition for 2019. The mined silver will not be sufficient to meet the demand. That is a condition that usually leads to higher prices. Buyers who want or need silver will pay whatever it takes to obtain it and the way the market balances supply and demand is by raising and lowering the price to attain a balance.
Let’s start off with a very important and interesting article that should not be missed. I considered itmust reading for anyone who owns silver, or is curious why it has performed so poorly for the last few years. It looks to be a game-changer.
JPMorgan is being investigated for price fixing by the Department of Justice (DOJ). This is not the impotent CFTC; it’s the DOJ. They don’t simply levyfines and a slap on the wrist. They send people away. Is it any wonder that JPMorgan has now closed out it silver shorts on the Comex? Uppermanagement over at JPMorgan has to be sweating bullets. People will go to jail. The DOJ is looking “up the management ladder.” The only thing holding down the price of silver (reflected by its near 86 to 1 silver/gold ratio) is JPMorgan’s manipulation andthey have been put on notice by the DOJ. If they take their foot off the brake, silver is set to soar.
Will DOJ Finally Hold Bullion Banks Accountable for Market Rigging?
It is hard to cheer for the Department of Justice these days, but federal prosecutions have begun to offer hope for precious metals investors hurt by rigged markets and crooked traders.
The DOJ looks poised to do what regulators at the CFTC have not. They will use evidence of blatant cheating and fraud to hold a few bankersaccountable.
Last week, DOJ officials asked the judge in a civil suit against JPMorgan Chase to delay proceedings for 6 months to clear the patch for more prosecutions.
David’s Commentary:
Take a deep breath and let out a big “Hurrah”. JPMorgan is finally long gone from the silver market. They have covered their short position. The fact that JPMorgan is now back in a market neutral position is, as Ed Steer says,” wildly bullish”.
Ed Steer
Silver analyst Ted Butler had this to say about in gold in his commentary
late yesterday afternoon…”It’s not quite as clear in gold, but I’d venture that JPM bought back the entire 30,000 gold contracts it shorted in October, as well.”
A few follow up comments about the still rather remarkable announcement by the Department of Justice concerning the guilty plea by the former JPMorgan trader for spoofing in precious metals. Contained in the announcement was the statement that the guilty plea was accepted and sealed on Oct 9, nearly a month before it was unsealed on Nov 6. With a rather short sentencing date approaching onDecember 19, and the time it took to unseal the plea, it may be assumed that the trader has already fully cooperated in the hopes of reducing his jail time, said to approach 30 years with no cooperation.
David’s Commentary:
In addition to the DOJ investigation into the silver price suppression, here is the second reason that the price of silver should rise next year…
Kitco News
By Anna Golubova
Silver Surplus Won’t Last, Prices To Rally Next Year — Capital Economics
(Kitco News) – Next year will be a turnaround year for silver, with prices expected to rally to $17 per ounce by the end of 2019 on higher investor demand and an unexpected end to the U.S. monetary policy tightening, according to Capital Economics.
David’s Commentary:
In case you don’t recall, the silver to gold ratio in the 2000s was often in the 40 to 1 or 50 to 1 range. There is a pattern on the following chart that is easy to see. After every sustained “rise” in the ratio, it is always followed by a “steep decline.” It would not be a stretch to expect the ratio to plunge back down to the low 50s or even the 40s.
So what does that mean for the price of silver? Let’s say, for kicks, that gold moves up to $1,350. I think that’s very conservative, don’t you? At $1,350with the silver to gold ratio at 50 to 1 the price of silver would be $27 per ounce. That’s almost twice as high as it is today (near $14). And if we set the price of gold at it’s most recent high of $1,900 should we not expect silver to at least reach it’shigh at that time of $50? I think so, at a minimum. That would move the silver to gold ratio down to 38 to 1.
$50 silver is not, in my estimation, a top. It is just a momentary stop along the way toward much higher prices. It’s human nature to chase a top. Greed sets in. You are witnessing it right now in the stock market. The “Normalcy Bias” sets in and people get used to rising prices and they begin to believe that this new trend will continue in motion. And it will, until it doesn’t. That, dear readers, is when you will be put to the test. “Is now the time to sell?” “Should I hold on longer for an even higher price?” Ah, I long for the good old days, but they will be back, and if the DOJ has anything to say about it, it will be sooner rather than later. Yes, 2019 should be one Hell of a year for Gold’s little sister.
Archived Newsletters
Market Report 11/27/2018
International Storage
Private Safe Deposit Boxes
Unencumbered / Segregated Storage
About Miles Franklin
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David’s son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin’s primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do.
We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, Jim Sinclair, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
For your protection, we are licensed, regulated, bonded and background checked per Minnesota State law.
Miles Franklin
801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 834
Wayzata, MN 55391
Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved.
Categories
Base Metals

JUNIOR MINING | Group Eleven Announces Inferred Mineral Resource at Ballinalack of 5.4Mt at 8.7% Zn+Pb, located 50 km from Europe’s Largest Zinc Mine

Vancouver, Canada, November 28, 2018 – Group Eleven Resources Corp. (TSX.V: ZNG; OTCQB: GRLVF; FRA: 3GE) (“Group Eleven” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the Company’s Ballinalack zinc project in Ireland. The estimate was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA Global”) under contract to SLR Environmental Consulting (Ireland) Ltd. (“SLR”) and was based on recent drilling by Group Eleven, as well as, historic drilling from the 1970s onwards. Ballinalack is a joint venture between Group Eleven (60%-interest) and Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Company Limited (“Nonfemet”, 40%-interest), one of the largest zinc producers in China. The Project is located 50 kilometres from Boliden’s substantial Navan (Tara) zinc mine.
“We are very pleased with this first NI43-101 Mineral Resource estimate on the project as it demonstrates concrete progress at Ballinalack. Specifically, we are delighted that the average grade of the MRE is significantly higher than the historic estimate from 1991 and that the metal content, despite a higher cut-off, remains above a billion pounds of zinc and lead” stated Bart Jaworski, CEO. “Furthermore, the deposit is open along and across strike, corroborating our recent drilling which helped identify four targets in the lower Navan Beds, three of which already contain strongly mineralized historic intercepts.”
“Strategically, it is important to remember that Ballinalack is located only 50 kilometres from Boliden’s giant Navan zinc mine – the largest zinc mine in Europe. With the Ballinalack MRE completed, we now have a springboard from which to focus on significant discovery both near the deposit and regionally as part of our ongoing ‘Big Think’ initiative.”
The Ballinalack project contains estimated Inferred Mineral Resources of 5.4 million tonnes grading 8.7% Zn+Pb combined (7.6% zinc and 1.1% lead) and 9.0 g/t silver (see Exhibit 1). This represents the Company’s second resource after the maiden Inferred Mineral Resource announced on the 76.56%-interest Stonepark project, also located in Ireland (see news release dated April 17, 2018).
Exhibit 1. Summary table of Mineral Resource at Ballinalack zinc project, Ireland

Resource Category Tonnes Grades Metal Content (pounds)
(‘000) Zn (%) Pb (%) Zn+Pb (%) Zn (mln) Pb (mln) Zn+Pb (mln)
Inferred 5,400 7.6 1.1 8.7 898 136 1,034

Note: See ‘Important Notes’ on Page 2 for additional notes regarding Mineral Resource reporting parameters and assumptions.
Mineralization is near-surface, occurring at depths ranging from 10 metres to 300 metres, and dips 15° to 20° to the north. The deposit shows reasonable continuity of mineralization and consists of sub-horizontal, strata-bound (5 to >30 metres thick) lenses of massive and semi-massive sphalerite and galena within the Waulsortian limestone. SLR and CSA Global comment that the deposit is open along and across strike and recommend additional step-out drilling to potentially augment the resource estimate. The study also states that the ‘greenfields’ exploration ground at the Ballinalack project has significant potential for further discovery.
The updated NI 43-101 technical report on the Ballinalack project will be published and submitted to SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.
Further Details on Ballinalack Mineral Resource Estimate
The MRE was based on 102 diamond drill holes totalling 26,042 metres. The average drill spacings are 40m by 40m. The MRE has an effective date of August 30, 2018 and is reported at a zinc equivalent (ZnEq) cut-off grade of 5.2%, based on NSR (net smelter return) calculations of conceptual operating costs and metal revenue, and indicates reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. NSR-based cut-off grades tend to fluctuate based on changes in global metal prices. For reference, the cut-off in the historic estimate from 19911 was 4% zinc.
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. No economic study has been completed over the project and NSR calculations are conceptual in nature and used only as the basis for determining reasonable chances of eventual economic extraction, a requirement of mineral resource disclosure.
The average grade of silver as part of the MRE was 9.0 g/t. This is a conservative estimate based on the fact that a portion of intercepts used to define the MRE were not historically assayed for silver. These were recorded as 0 g/t silver in the database and as such were assumed by CSA Global to be below detection limit and set to 0.25 g/t silver (representing half of detection limit) during estimation.
For further information on the four Navan Bed targets identified by Group Eleven after recent drilling, please refer to news release dated August 7, 2018.
Important Notes (Mineral Resource at Ballinalack zinc project, Ireland)
Classification of the Ballinalack MRE was completed based on the guidelines presented by Canadian Institute for Mining (CIM), adopted for Technical reports which adhere to the regulations defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101).

  • Inferred Mineral Resources are at 5.2% zinc equivalent cut-off grade.
  • Zinc Equivalent (ZnEq%) = (NSRPb + NSRZn + NSRAg in Pb + NSRAg in Zn)*100/(RZn*PZn* (PrZn-ScZn) – RZn*PZn*PrZn*(RoyZn/100))
  • ZnEq cut-off grade (calculated from Net Smelter Return) using the following parameters:
    • RZn: Metallurgical recovery of Zn, PZn: Zn price, ScZn: Selling cost for Zn, RoyZn: Royalty.
    • Mining recovery of 95%; Mining dilution of 10%
    • Mining cost of US$60.00/t; Processing cost of US$13.63/t
    • Treatment charges of US$400/t of Zn concentrate and US$270/t of Pb concentrate; Refining charges of US$1.00/oz for Ag
    • Concentrate transport to smelter: US$100/t of wet concentrate.
    • Processing recovery 92.7% Zn; 54.1% Pb; 82.6% Ag in Zn; 9.4% Ag in Pb.
    • Zinc price of US$2,954/t; Lead price of US$2,325/t; Silver price of US$15.79/oz
    • Concentrate grade 64.4% Zn, 45% Pb, 98 g/t Ag in Zn, 104 g/t Ag in Pb; Concentrate moisture of 9%
    • Payable Zn 85%, Pb 93%, Ag in Zn 49%, Ag in Pb 51.9%, with selling cost Zn US$1,259/t metal, Pb US$1,026/t metal, Ag in Zn US$6.73/t metal, and Ag in Pb US$6.97/t metal.
    • Royalty of 4.5%.
  • The Inferred Mineral Resource classification is based on geology, trends in mineralisation, drilling spacing, sampling QA/QC, estimation search pass number and number of samples, and zinc equivalent grade.
  • Tonnages and metal are rounded to the nearest 100,000 to reflect this as an estimate.
  • Assumed average in situ dry bulk density for mineralised material is 3.05 t/m3.
  • Mineralisation wireframes were constructed using a minimum true thickness of 2.0 m, at 3% Zn+Pb natural cut-off.
  • CSA Global is not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the MRE.

Qualified Person
Dr Belinda van Lente, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, independent of the Company, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information as related to the preparation and reporting of the Mineral Resource set out in this news release. Dr van Lente is a resource geologist with over 13 years of industry experience, both in a consulting and production environment. Her experience includes Mineral Resource Estimates and audits on various commodities. She has extensive experience in the practical application of estimation methods, standards and procedures used in the creation and declaration of Mineral Resource estimates and is a Member of the Geological Society of South Africa (GSSA) and the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP).
Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC)
CSA Global’s Qualified Person has reviewed the QA/QC data and considers that the data support the use of the drillhole data in a Mineral Resource estimate to be reported specific to the standards dictated by NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects).CSA Global’s Qualified Person has reviewed the QA/QC data and considers the data to be fit-for-purpose to support reporting of a Mineral Resource in accordance with NI 43.101.
About Group Eleven Resources
Group Eleven Resources Corp. (TSX.V: ZNG; FRA: 3GE and OTC: GRLVF) is focused on zinc exploration in Ireland. The Company’s large land package (99 prospecting licenses totalling 3,200 square kilometres) allows Group Eleven to leverage new geological thinking and geophysical technology to systematically rethink key aspects of the Irish zinc district. Key projects include Ballinalack (with Joint Venture partner Nonfemet), Stonepark (with Joint Venture partner Connemara Mining), Silvermines and Tralee. The Company’s team includes accomplished mining professionals with direct experience in finding mines, building companies and exploring Irish zinc deposits.
Additional information about the Company is available at www.groupelevenresources.com.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Bart Jaworski, P.Geo.
Chief Executive Officer
For more information, please contact:
Spiros Cacos, MA
Vice President, Investor Relations
E: s.cacos@groupelevenresources.com | T: +1 604 630 8839
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Such statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the future results of operations, performance and achievements of the Company, including the timing, content, cost and results of proposed work programs, the discovery and delineation of mineral deposits/resources/ reserves and geological interpretations. Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements by the Company are not guarantees of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that may be located. All of the Company’s public disclosure filings may be accessed via www.sedar.com and readers are urged to review these materials, including the technical reports filed with respect to the Company’s mineral properties, and particularly the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Independent Report on a Base Metal Exploration Project at Ballinalack, Co. Westmeath, Ireland” with an effective date of November 20, 2017 by John Kelly and Paul Gordon (SLR Consulting Ireland) with respect to the Ballinalack project.


1 A historical estimate of 7.7 million tonnes grading 6.3% zinc + 1.0% lead (7.3% combined) was previously disclosed on the Ballinalack project. The historical estimate is described in a report prepared by the Robertson Group plc in 1991 and is classified under the “IMM Definition of Terms for Reporting Assets” as an “Indicated Mineral Resource,” using a 4.0% zinc cut-off.